Analysis Of Descartes Dream Argument

1001 Words3 Pages

You stop to observe the goings on of your day, things that are mundane and nothing out of the ordinary. How can you prove that what you are seeing is not all but a dream? According to Descartes’ Dream Argument, it is impossible to tell with Cartesian, or absolute, certainty that any given experience is not a dream. While we may believe what we perceive to be true, it is not always wise to trust our senses, as they have tendencies to fail us. Because perception begins at the senses, if we cannot trust them to be accurate one hundred percent of the time, there is no way to tell if any given moment is dreamed or reality. Take for example seeing a random person playing with their surroundings for fun, something that is not out of the ordinary. …show more content…

This is idea is shown through Descartes’ Painter Analogy, where he states, “painters themselves, even when they study to represent sirens and satyrs by forms the most fantastic and extraordinary, cannot bestow upon them natures absolutely new…” (Descartes, Meditation I, para. 6). Basically what Descartes’ is saying is that the mind cannot create something entirely new, it must have some sort of memory or experience with whatever they are creating or thinking, even if it may seem abstract. For example, take the human face, which can be recreated during a dream. However, although the face might be entirely new to the dreamer, it is most definitely an amalgam of different faces they experienced while in a waking state. While the eyes, nose, mouth, face and hair may be from all different people put together on one face, the dreamer still had to experience each of those facets to have them in the dream. Experience is needed to dream, and even though we may not be sure if the information we receive is dreamt or experienced, there still has to be some base knowledge where a waking experience is required. While we cannot tell for sure if an individual moment is dreamt, we can say for sure that there is a state of waking, where we experience the world through a more truthful …show more content…

Any truth that can exist in one can exist in the other. Because of this, there is no definite way to tell if an experience is dreamt or not. The arguments against this are purely speculative, based on personal experiences, and perhaps experiences of others, but that is not enough. Just because one person may not feel pain during a dream, signifying some sort of differentiation between the two states, does not mean another person doesn’t. Because all the evidence against this argument are purely speculative and circumstantial, it proves that we cannot prove consciousness at any given moment with Cartesian certainty. A waking state does exist, however, our ability to differentiate it from a sleeping state is impossible, leading to confusion about experiences. Having Cartesian certainty about whether or not we are dreaming at any given moment allows us to evaluate all the other aspects that might be skewed our findings. Because we may be asleep at any moment, who is to say our knowledge and experiences aren’t all dreamed? The brain, although a complex mechanism, is not complex to come up with the ideas that we have experienced within them. We may form new ideas based on our experiences, but the basis of it must have been experienced at one point or another. Our brain’s need reference for knowledge, and for us to know absolute truths, we need to understand that some truths may not be as

Open Document