More handpicked essays just for you.
Why academic freedom is important
Outline 5 implications of academic freedom
Why academic freedom is important
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Coddling of the American Mind, by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, is an article published by the Atlantic Journal about the negative effects trigger warnings and microaggressions have on students in college. Trigger warnings are disclaimers about any potential emotional response from a class or its material. (44) Microaggressions are words or actions that have no sinister intentions, but people take as such. (44) Greg Lukianoff is the president and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. (47) As the leader of the foundation, Greg Lukianoff has witnessed and fought many legal occasions of trigger warnings and microaggressions resulting in the masking of freedom of speech. Coauthor Jonathan Haidt is a professor at New …show more content…
According to The Coddling of the American Mind, trigger warnings and microaggressions confine professors’ and well-educated adults’ unalienable right of speech; furthermore, they can impact one’s health. Protecting rights have a unison consensus; the authors unite them and the audience together to persuade the well-educated adults to protest the use of trigger warnings and microaggressions. While concluding that vindictive protectiveness is the reason for trigger warnings and microaggressions Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt state, “A campus culture devoted to policing speech and punishing speakers is likely to engender patterns of thought that are surprisingly similar to those long identified by cognitive behavioral therapists as causes of depression and anxiety.” (45) The word “policing” holds a negative connotation implying regulation, and no one wants their first amendment right of free speech stolen from them. Also the idea that trigger warnings and microaggressions may lead to depression and anxiety gives more logical reasoning to end trigger warnings and microaggressions in higher level education. When the authors specify the change that colleges should make, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt write their idea of the purpose of college, “Rather than
Charles R. Lawrence intended audience in his article “On Racist Speech” is college students and universities. His sense of tone is forthcoming. Lawerence word choice sets the tone by using the words conspicuous,dissenter, and bigot. The article gives examples of how universities do not protect minority college students. Lawrence states that universities should protect their students He also gives an example of how universities have tried to have rules to ban racist speech yet they have proven ineffective in stopping racial slurs. The regulations have not stopped the verbal brutality yet it has stopped the occurrences of physical fights. He mentions how students do not have any need to be hurt verbally.
Some people love controversy; some despise it. Regardless of how one views a controversial topic, odds are he is fascinated by it and has his own thoughts on the matter. Journalist Leonard Pitts, Jr., who authors editorial articles for the Miami Herald, writes extremely opinionated pieces on current controversial topics targeting those who are not minorities. He writes with the goal of bringing to light issues that people would rather not discuss. Pitts’ style can be seen through pieces such as “Don’t Lower the Bar on Education Standards;” “Torture Might Work, but That’s Not the Issue;” and “If the Gunman is White, We’re OK With Mass Murder. No, Really, We Are.” In “Don’t Lower the Bar,” Pitts addresses the standards gap in the education system
In an article originally published in May 2003 in USA Today called “College Isn’t For Everyone,” by W.J. Reeves combined these rhetorical devices to make a compelling argument that although colleges are easily accessible, higher education lacks students with the capabilities of academic success. To validate this claim, Reeves uses persuasive appeals to convey an effective argument by influencing the audience, however, he limits his reach because of the excessive pathos and condescending tone used to present his argument.
Although some like Conor Friedersdorf, of the Atlantic, categorized students as “intolerant bullies, (34)” meaning that the reasons for protests were not really reasons at all. Chang argues that the issues students are expressing need to be improved upon as if not, we will continue to go round and round in this vicious cycle. The addition of the apartheid in South Africa backs up Chang’s argument as there is a consensus of it being a serious issue. This explains why he included this piece of history and how it relates to college campuses. Encouraging critics to listen to students, just as Meyer did to those of color, is the only way to prevent today's youth from bring up the same issues in future years. Just as Chang predicted, the next school year brought protesters to hundreds of colleges and universities. What happened at Mizzou was just the beginning of a country wide movement for racial justice on campuses that hasn’t stopped
In the article “The Coddling of the American Mind” the authors Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt express that college campuses in America are dealing with emotional discomfort every day. They point out whether we are too emotional on certain topics in our lives or we need to change something on college campuses to have students feel more comfortable. College student have experienced a lot in life so I think that campuses should help college students through traumatic experiences in their past instead of not acknowledging certain topics and banning them to discuss in class like rape and domestic violence which happens in our everyday life. Colleges need to step up and talk about these things so students can feel more comfortable.
College is full of new experiences, new people, and new communities, and many universities encourage the exchange of new ideas and diversity among students. This year, the University of Chicago sent out a letter to all of its incoming freshmen informing them that in keeping with their beliefs of freedom of expression and healthy discussion and debate, the school would not provide “safe spaces” or “trigger warnings”. Senior Sophie Downes found this letter to be misleading in many ways, including in the definitions of safe spaces and trigger warnings, as well as the issues it was addressing. Downes claims that the letter was misrepresenting the school, but also was using the letter as a sort
The author argues that the use of “trigger warnings” should not become a policy due to the student becoming uncomfortable over a certain lesson in class. The argument is effective in parts, but not as a whole. What about the students who actually are medically unable to deal with a lesson in class due to PTSD? This editorial really only showed the bad side of trigger warnings inside colleges classes instead of showing the pros and the cons like most would. Some people claim that the addition of trigger warnings would not affect a college student’s ability to complete the work. It would also be difficult to do well on parts of a test unless they have a friend who will attend class still and take notes for them. Over all, trigger warnings are not completely bad, but they can most definitely be taken advantage of by students who do not want to go to classes one
In the editorial “Coddling of the American Mind,” Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt examine the political correctness on college campuses and how it may be hurting students’ mental health. They explain by allowing campuses to discuss words, ideas, and subjects that can cause discomfort or give offense can provide positive attributes like helping students to produce better arguments and more productive discussions over differences. Does Lukianoff and Haidt provide sufficient evidence about how college campuses should raise attention about the need to balance freedom of speech to help students in their future and education to lead the reader to agree with their argument? The answer is yes,
They start with recent examples of the growing trend of the collegiate sensitivity: “Last December, Jeannie Suk wrote in an online article for The New Yorker about law students asking her fellow professors at Harvard not to teach rape law…or.. use the word violate” (Lukianoff 1). Showing an example of the extremes of students in an attempt to avoid student distress, Lukianoff and Haidt then follow with two examples of articles written by professors, one who later had complaints filed on her by students and one too scared to even publish the article with his true name. In order to effectively prove their point Lukianoff and Haidt end their introduction with the fact that even professional comedians are too frightened to perform shows at universities claiming students “can’t take at joke” (Lukianoff 1). This introduction effectively drives their beginning argument that students have been coddled so much as to take everything offensively to the point that they even frighten their
Although trigger warnings sound like a harmless idea to many, there is an extreme controversy about whether or not they should be used in college lectures. Many college professors have conflicting views about trigger warnings; some agree on using them while others are against it. This debate topic is particularly intriguing in Kate Manne’s article in the New York Times titled, “Why I Use Trigger
Recently, more and more people began to concentrate on the problem of Free Speech. Lots of unnecessary troubles in campus were produced by free speech. Thus, the “trigger warnings”, which is a kind of way to prevent unnecessary troubles, are under ardent debate. Even some major media, such as the New York Times, began to focus on reporting the materials about trigger warnings. In the articles from American Now, authors Jennifer Medina, Brianne Richson and Jon Overton expressed their opinions about the trigger warnings, the ways to prevent unnecessary troubles, respectively. The trigger warnings are not very useful and helpful because it may increase the time to prepare for the class, make more troubles for students and full of flaws that could not eliminate the topics that students don’t want to see.
Mona Charen wrote “Snowflakes or Fascist?” (November 13, 2015) to argue that college students have become entitled and demanding of teachers. Charen supports this claim by explaining present and historical incidents where students have crossed the line and disrespected their authoritative figures. Her purpose is to show recent events in order to explain to the reader the effects of poor behavior of students and the inability of teachers to discipline on the college community. The author uses a comical yet censorious tone to appeal to her audience that is University teachers and their students.
...ild, when he would hide and daydream, up until his first years of college, when he would avoid areas that were difficult, the author recognized that there was important link between challenging the student on a meaningful level and the degree to which the student eventually produced. “I felt stupid telling them I was… well – stupid.” (Rose 43) Here, Rose shows an example of how poor preparation and low standards in the classroom can make a student feel inadequate. Indeed, one can see how many things seemingly unrelated do affect a student’s ability to learn.
We’re called weak for wanting to deal with situations on our own time. Trigger warning, we have professors who may or may not use them. According to NPR Ed a survey was conducting to determine if professor have used trigger warnings in their classrooms “about half of professors said they’ve used a trigger warning in advance of introducing potentially difficult material”. When the survey was conduct overall 51% have used trigger warning while the other 49% have not. Dr. Onni Gust, assistant professor at the university of Nottingham, states “I use trigger warnings because they help students to stop for a moment and breathe, which helps them to think.” Gust highlights the importance of why he uses trigger warnings. He feels as if students should be able to make the choice of whether they want to deal with a certain situation at hand at that time. He gives students time to comprehend what they will be discussing and allows time for them to breathe and think. Gust, contends “unlike with two-year-old, I do not let my students avoid difficult or disturbing topics.” Here he shows that he does not coddle his students the way society has made it seem. Even though he gives warnings he gives them as a way for students to prepare themselves for the topic that is going to be discussed. Trigger warnings are not just considered as coddling and weak but are considered as giving students a
Traditionally, college is the place for students to be exposed to new challenges, new cultures, and overall a new way of life. It is widely known that most colleges give a student the perfect opportunity to expand and grow as a person. Going to college is very prestigious and almost a necessity to obtain most jobs, so therefore, a student’s educational experience is a very valuable thing in today’s society and it is not to be tampered with. The argument of trigger warnings shows up mainly in the case that professors are fighting against the implementation of them into their class curriculum. Whether the argument be for or against trigger warnings, this topic is becoming a very serious issue that is being brought