Analysis Of Don T Lower The Bar By Leonard Pitts

1689 Words4 Pages

Some people love controversy; some despise it. Regardless of how one views a controversial topic, odds are he is fascinated by it and has his own thoughts on the matter. Journalist Leonard Pitts, Jr., who authors editorial articles for the Miami Herald, writes extremely opinionated pieces on current controversial topics targeting those who are not minorities. He writes with the goal of bringing to light issues that people would rather not discuss. Pitts’ style can be seen through pieces such as “Don’t Lower the Bar on Education Standards;” “Torture Might Work, but That’s Not the Issue;” and “If the Gunman is White, We’re OK With Mass Murder. No, Really, We Are.” In “Don’t Lower the Bar,” Pitts addresses the standards gap in the education system …show more content…

In “Don’t Lower the Bar,” he compares the educational standards difference with an athletic gap: “The best analogy I can give you is based in the fact that some coaches and athletic directions have noted a steep decline in the number of white kids going out for basketball. They feel as if they cannot compete with their black classmates. What if we addressed that by lowering the rim for white kids? What if we allowed them four points for each made basket?” (Pitts). The example of basketball makes the idea of the standards gap easier to fathom for readers who might not completely understand the issue. The analogy also puts into perspective the way minority students may feel when different expectations are set for them. Comparisons between one idea and another are also made in “Torture Might Work.” Pitts postulates that “...if you wanted to stop that carnage, it would be simple. Just make drunk driving a capital crime with instant punishment...We could execute the miscreants within a day...It would work...But we won’t make drunk driving a capital crime for one simple reason. It would be wrong” (“Torture Might Work”). By correlating one controversial topic with a seperate one, the author captures the reader’s attention and gets him or her thinking. When such a hot topic as drunk driving is introduced, any reader, regardless of whether or not he agrees with Pitts, is more inclined to hear out the argument. In addition, the …show more content…

For instance, “Can you imagine how those white kids would feel whenever they took the court? How long would it be before they internalized the lie that there is something about being white that makes you inherently inferior when it comes to hoops…?” (Pitts, “Don’t Lower the Bar”). Not only do these questions cause the reader to speculate about possible answers, but they also touch the reader’s emotions. The audience can put themselves in the position of the athletes and feel the way they might. This all comes together to make Pitts’ point stronger because articles that leave a reader with something to consider after the piece has been read are what stick in one’s mind. In “Torture Might Work,” the writer also uses rhetorical questions. For example, “Does torture work?” or “...if [effectiveness] were the only important metric, what other things might we do, condone or defend?” (Pitts, “Torture might Work”). The questions in this article are asked with the assumption that the reader already knows the answer; the purpose of them, then, is to segway into Pitts’ ideas. The inquisitional format is effective because it piques the curiosity of the audience and keeps them wondering what will come next. There are also questions in the third article: “Shall I parse the killer’s motivations? Shall I praise the heroism in the midst of massacre? Shall I call out the evil in this world? Shall I demand a

Open Document