Analysis Of Medea

1493 Words3 Pages

Conclusions regarding knowledge are inevitably and fully the result of the concepts that we use because concepts are inseparable from an individual 's thoughts, memories, and preconceived ideas; however, there are some aspects of a concept that must be addressed when it comes to the existence of a “pure concept”. A concept – void of any bias is likely impossible, simply due to the fact that concepts cannot be exclusive of an individual 's mentality. Concepts are used to interpret, analyze, and evaluate experiences, information, and facts in an attempt to answer questions and resolve issues. Depending on the concept an individual chooses to use, the conclusions that arise from the concept are often unique to that specific concept. The use of
For example, in English, we studied Medea and analyzed the work in regards to feminism, Marxism, Freudianism, and formalism. We also analyzed the work in regards to Ancient Greek. It was almost as though we used different lenses to understand the work. In relation to feminism, we concluded that Medea was a character that upheld a new archetype for female heroines in literature. In regard to Marxism, we concluded that Euripedes’s emphasis on the evils of greed and the importance of moderation shows that he would support a Marxist philosophy. By analyzing Medea through the “lens” of Freudianism, we concluded that the relationship dynamics between Medea, her father, and her husband – Jason, caused her to kill her own children. Lastly, through the “lens” of formalism, we analyzed the play though Euripedes’s use of the chorus, stasimons, and anistrophes, concluding that the structure of these parts impacted the overall tone of the play. Based on the “lens” we use to analyze the work, we may find evidence to support our point of view over another point of view. There isn’t a true way to identify the validity of either perspective, thus each perspective is taken into account during the analysis. A feminist analysis of Medea led to the conclusion of Medea being a new type of heroine in Greek literature. In contrast, a Freudian analysis of Medea would lead to a conclusion more focused on how Medea’s relationship with her father, husband, and upbringing drove her to murder her own children. Thus, this demonstrates the disparities between conclusions created by using different

Open Document