Analysis Of Julie Otsuka's The Buddha In The Attic

670 Words2 Pages

Novels satisfy a human compulsion to peer into the lives of others and to see ourselves reflected in their narratives. Julie Otsuka’s The Buddha in the Attic uses a nontraditional narrative approach to explore the experience of the Japanese “picture brides” and their lives in America. Through an unusual narrative structure and point of view, the novel emphasizes the unique experience of each Japanese woman featured (however briefly) in the narrative while suggesting an underlying universality in their lives.
The novel’s structure balances the individuality and anonymity of the characters. Otsuka populates the story with women from different backgrounds, with different faces, different histories, different expectations, different lives: “Some …show more content…

While a first-person narrator creates a certain intimacy with the reader, as if he were confiding in a friend, the effect of telling the story that “we” experience includes the reader over and over in the narrative itself: “We discussed the latest rumors. I hear they’re putting us into work camps to grow food for the troops, We turned on the radio and listened to the bulletins from the front” (89). Adding to the blurred lines between narrator, character, and reader, Otsuka changes perspective in her final chapter, “A Disappearance.” Until this point, the “we” telling the story speaks from the perspective of the picture brides. However, in the last chapter the Japanese homes stand empty, and the white residents continue the narrative as the new “we.” Moving the narrative perspective from one group to another creates a sense of unity between the two groups while emphasizing the gulf between them, producing an oddly dislocating and terribly sad experience for the reader. One scene perfectly captures this effect as the narrator points out,“Harada Grocery is closed, and in its front window hangs a hand-written sign none of us can remember having seen there before -- God be with you until we meet again, it reads. And of course, we cannot help but wonder: Who put up the sign? Was it one of them? Or one of us?” (115). The questions

Open Document