Analysis Of John Millington Synge's 'Riders To The Sea'

969 Words2 Pages

“Riders to the Sea” is a play written by John Millington Synge, who was influenced by Yeats to visit the Aran Islands. Synge can be credited with providing a sort of sense realism to the Abbey Theatre, as plays such as “Cathleen ni Houlihan” were a mere symbolic representation of Ireland itself, while Synge tried to portray what the reality was at his time. Maurya, the protagonist of the play, is the victim of a terrible fate brought by the sea. She is depicted as a typical mother, who lives entirely for the well-being of her family and at the beginning of the play, Maurya had already lost her husband, father-in- law, and was in a deep grieving for her fifth son, Michael, who had been lost for days in the sea. She is aware that her …show more content…

When Bartley tells Cathleen to sell the pig, Maurya answers “How would the like of her get a good price for the pig?” (Harrington, 2009) Once again, Bartley tells Cathleen that “If the west wind holds with the last bit of the moon let you and Nora get up weed enough for another cock for the kelp. It's hard set we'll be from this day with no one in it but one man to work,” (Harrington, 2009) to which Maurya replies “It's hard set we'll be surely the day you're drownd'd with the rest. What way will I live and the girls with me, and I an old woman looking for the grave?” (Harrington, 2009) She was unable to stop him, and she knows his fate will turn out true, as she did not give him her blessing: “He's gone now, God spare us, and we'll not see him again. He's gone now, and when the black night is falling I'll have no son left me in the world.” (Harrington, 2009) She tried to reach him in order to give him her blessing but she failed miserably, and upon reaching home she stated that “I seen the fearfulest thing”, (Harrington, 2009) which was seeing Michael riding on the grey pony behind Bartley. She eventually found out that not only was she sure that Michael was dead, but so was Bartley. She resigns herself to the fact that all of the male members of the family are dead, and finds consolation on the fact that the sea can do no …show more content…

Maurya was constantly aware of the threat of the sea, and through the loss of all the male members of her family, she became forever linked with the natural world. She is thus a metaphor for women as a force of nature: her tragedy is about having to stay behind as a female and the consequences of her losses. She is part of a society in which the role of both men and women are already strictly defined and should not be challenged. The loss of a male in a household is catastrophic, as they depend on fishing and only men could do that, and women should only stay at home cooking, taking care of clothes and minding animals. Thus, Maurya fails in not being able to stop her son from going to the sea and is thus also perceived as a metaphor for her inability to act, due to her role as a female. If she were to act and gave her blessing to her son Bartley, perhaps his death could have been avoided. When she was given the power of speech in order to give him her blessing, she failed: “tried to say "God speed you," but something choked the words in my throat. He went by quickly; and, "The blessing of God on you," says he, and I could say nothing.” (Harrington, 2009) At the end of the play, Maurya also appears as the symbol of universal motherhood, as she prays not only for her, nor for her own family, but for all

Open Document