American Revolution Vs French Revolution Analysis

735 Words2 Pages

The American Revolution and French Revolution were two long lasting uprisings that had great value to those battling for their rights and want they wanted to change. Yet there are a few distinctions details set them apart in a small way. The Americans wanted a change in their government, but the French wanted a huge change in everything including their government, religion, social structure (whereas American’s social system stayed the same) and economy. Other than the few differences they had, they two Revolutions were much alike, basically twin revolutions. The American revolution started when The King of Britain lost an immense amount of money. He bought high priced equipment and supplies for the army that basically costed an arm and a leg. Which led him to decide they would regain their money by taxing the colonist. His poor decisions of taxing the people without their agreement outraged them and sent them into a state of revolt. Much like Britain and their need for money, King Louis XVI needed money due to causing France to become bankrupt with his costly …show more content…

I believe that if people are being forced to tax without reasoning or benefits they should be able to fight back and want a change. I also believe that if someone believes in a religion that’s their business and they should not be told what's right or wrong. All of these unfair laws and things being down is reasonable to start a revolution and want a complete change. They got the changes they wanted and even made a great change in both America and France. A revolt is a rebellion and that's exactly what happened in these revolutions. All of this evidence leads me to believe these were, in fact, revolutions as clearly said in their names “The American Revolution” and “The French

Open Document