Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Martin luther king's impacts on society
Impact of martin luther king
Martin luther kings impact on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A common debate around the world is whether or not America cherishes diversity. Authors such as Edward Patel and Jena McGregor have differing view points on this topic and numerous amounts of points to back it up. Patel argues that America cherishes diversity because political leaders such as George Washington and Martin Luther King fought to have a country with all groups of people that are willing to demean themselves as good citizens and help the country grow. On the other hand, McGregor believes that American industries like Hollywood limit high roles to white males. In the discussions of whether or not America cherishes diversity in my class, one controversial issue has been that America was once a slave country. On the one hand, fifty …show more content…
percent of the class believes that America cherishes diversity. On the other hand, the other fifty percent of the class opposes that America cherishes diversity. Others even believe that America doesn't want diversity in the country. My view is that America cherishes diversity because leaders like George Washington fought to have different cultures in the country, and today we have schools and jobs that hire all different kinds of people to work together to help the country grow. America cherishes diversity because leaders like George Washington have fought hard to bring cultural groups together.
According to Patel in, “ Making the Future Better, Together,” he states that, “ Washington came to his views through both principle and practical experience. As the leader of the continental army, the first truly national institution, Washington recognized he was going to need the contributions of all willing groups in America. Back then, it was a common anti-catholic practice to burn the pope in effigy. Washington banned this... and brought this ethic to his private life. When seeking a carpenter and a bricklayer for his Mount Vernon estate, he remarked, If they are good workmen, they may be of Asia, Africa, or Europe. They may be Mohometans, Jews or Christians of any Sect, or they may be atheists.” In other words Patel believes, America has been built for diversity by leaders like Washington because they believed that as long as people demeaned themselves as good citizens and followed American principles that they could join the country. Since the country has followed this idea, Patel believes that today many groups of people are in this country based on these principles because they love the country and want to watch it grow. I agree with Patel because we have many different groups of people in America that are interacting with each other and love it here. Granted, our country discriminated blacks in the past, but our country has learned from Washington …show more content…
and Martin Luther King that different cultures need to be brought together and be treated equally so that this county prospers and is an example of what a loving environment is. In our country we have billions of people that are white, black, Hispanic, Jewish, Asian, Russian, German, and more.
This means that our country has people of all different races in it, which supports the idea that America cherishes diversity. It is true on the other hand, that our founding fathers like Washington were slave owners. However, that doesn't change the ideas Washington fought for according to Martin Luther King. According to Patel, “ What strikes me about King's use of George Washington as a symbol of Democracy is that King's great grand parents could well have been owned by George Washington. The man who welcomed Jews and Catholics into the nation, the man who spoke of a government that gave bigotry no sanction and persecution no assistance, he was a slaveholder. King new this, but it neither paralyzed him nor made him cynical. He didn't tie himself into knots trying to untie that mother of all contradictions. Instead, he committed himself, body and soul, to shaping the future. America's genius is to give its diversity of citizens a stake in the well- being of the nation. That's what keeps us facing forward, seeking inspiration from the past when possible, correcting mistakes when necessary. This nation could very well have been a house divided, but today we stand as one...” In this quote Patel's message is that even though leaders like Washington were slave holders their ideas are what matters. King understood this and used Washington's points to justify that
blacks and whites should live together equally and happy. Because of these leaders, we have a nation that stands together with groups of different people around the world. Nevertheless, critics like Jena McGregor argue that the nation doesn't cherish diversity because of the problems at The Hollywood Academy. She states that at least 93 percent of the cast of the Academy are white and 76 percent of the cast is male. Admittedly, it is true that industries like Hollywood have bias about the race and culture of their work places, however, an industry like Hollywood doesn't effect the beliefs of the whole country. Also, fifty percent of my classmates argued that America is full of people that are racist to others and don't accept principles of others religion. However, every group of people have their own religious beliefs. It is law that every citizen has a right to defend their religious beliefs to others so racism isn't the main issue. Like the other fifty percent of the class said, America is full of people that work together and go to school together. We have billions of people on this planet that come here to work. We have all different races at schools from most of the year where kids interact with each other and learn to get future jobs that help the country grow. This evidence proves to the naysayers that our country is based on principles that cherish all different groups of people in the country. Therefore, I conclude that America cherishes diversity and welcomes any religion or culture in as long as they choose to follow American principles and be a good citizen. My claim to this topic matters because it expresses the meaning of this country. Although my claim seems trivial, it is in fact crucial in terms of today's concern over bias. The country was founded on the idea that anyone could join if they followed American principles. Today we have many people of all different cultures in our country that work to watch it rise. This is important because many believe the country contains bias. While it does, part of it is because certain religions don't like the principles of another religion so they hire or work with people that agree with them. This doesn't mean the country doesn't cherish diversity since everyone has a right to defend their culture and believe what they want. My claim matters because it supports the idea that America loves different cultures coming together. Religious differences don't change this and it is important for people to understand that a group's principles don't have to be the same as another's to be non bias. Our country does support diversity and continues to grow from this concept as time goes on.
Over the past decades, Hollywood movies have brought out the representations of racial inequality through out various themes of racism and stereotypical ways. One frequent type of racial inequality is that there is a culture or race that is belittled, under-privilege and inferior while the other is superior and high in order. In “The Offensive Movie Cliché That Won’t Die” by Matt Zoller Seitz, He identifies the term “magical negro” as: “a saintly African American character who acts as a mentor to a questing white hero, who seems to be disconnected from the community that he adores so much, and who often seems to have an uncanny ability to say and do exactly what needs to be said or done in order to keep the story chugging along in the hero’s favor” (408) and in Mitu Sengupta “ Race Relations Light Years from the Earth” the author examines the movie Avatar as a racist film, and focuses on how it resembles the “white messiah” stereotype. The term “white messiah” is known as a white individual who hold superior power, according to David Brooks of the New York Times, “a stereotype that white people are rationalistic and technocratic while colonial victims are spiritual and athletic, and that nonwhites need the White Messiah to lead their crusades” (Sengupta 213). Both articles dwell and explain the two terms and how it portrays the themes of racism and stereotypes through two elements, known as author’s purpose and main idea. These elements effectively convey the theme because it prevents our thoughts from being scattered by a broad spectrum of ideas and instead, it tells you exactly what is going to be discussed throughout the article.
Over past decades, Hollywood movies have brought out the representations of racial inequality through out various themes of racism and stereotypical ways. One frequent type of racial inequality is that there is a culture or race that is belittled, under-privilege and inferior while the other is superior and high in order. In “The Offensive Movie Cliché That Won’t Die” by Matt Zoller Seitz, He identifies the term “magical negro” as: “a saintly African American character who acts as a mentor to a questing white hero, who seems to be disconnected from the community that he adores so much, and who often seems to have an uncanny ability to say and do exactly what needs to be said or done in order to keep the story chugging along in the hero’s favor” (408) and in Mitu Sengupta “ Race Relations Light Years from the Earth” the author examines the movie Avatar as a racist film, and focuses on how it resembles the “white messiah” stereotype. The term “white messiah” is known as a white individual who hold superior power, according to David Brooks of the New York Times, “a stereotype that white people are rationalistic and technocratic while colonial victims are spiritual and athletic, and that nonwhites need the White Messiah to lead their crusades” (Sengupta 213). Both articles dwell and explain the two terms and how it portrays the themes of racism and stereotypes through two elements, known as author’s purpose and main idea. These elements effectively convey the theme because it prevents our thoughts from being scattered by a broad spectrum of ideas and instead, it tells you exactly what is going to be discussed throughout the article.
The ability for people to look at a situation from a different perspective is vital in today’s globalized society. Diversity is the most important core attribute we share that gives us a new perspective to assess situations differently through our diverse backgrounds and upbringings. Unlike Patrick J. Buchanan’s argument in his essay titled “Deconstructing America,” diversity is not a burden, but rather a necessity in America’s culture. Conversely, Fredrickson 's essay titled, “Models of American Ethnic Relations: A Historical Perspective,” illustrated a more precise version of American history that disproves Buchanan’s ethnocentric ideologies. Buchanan speaks of diversity as a narrow, one-way street. The imprecise interpretations of history
In A Different Mirror, Ronald Takaki told a story that linked together multiracial groups in which there are many sides to the story more than just domination and conquest in America, where immigrants did not come by choice and natives who lived on the lands before the Americans came were forced to leave or sell their lands because either it was for survival. Even when choice was available, it was limited. America was a new country compared to other countries, in which the people were still wondering who goes to which hierarchal level because it was not yet stratified. It took a great deal of work to create a norm of white superiority and minority insubordination and inferiority. Race played an important role in making the modern United States
He seemed to have “supported segregation and the disenfranchisement of Blacks,” despite being “involved in politics” while speaking on the “prevention of disenfranchisement” (Seaton 55). Washington did what he believed was best for the helpless Americans, but in doing so, the perception he gave to them and DuBois was that “the white stereotype holds over Blacks and how they are positioned to be aware of it” (Seaton 55). In “The Souls of Black Folk,” DuBois even states about the “distinct status of civil inferiority for the Negro” under Washington’s policy (DuBois 1331). In Washington’s Atlanta speech, his motive was “to show whites that Blacks were making incremental progress and to ease the tension that was building all throughout the country” (Seaton 55). It can be said that Washington was publicly working under the ideology of white-supremacists, compensating them instead of the Black community. On the other hand, DuBois wanted to “integrate the African-American people into the modern affairs of America and allow for them to forge lives and gain inclusion into American society” (Seaton 56). He wanted to include minorities in the “American social body,” whereas Washington didn’t strongly oppose segregation, but only wanted to ease tensions with white-supremacists (Seaton
The film observes and analyzes the origins and consequences of more than one-hundred years of bigotry upon the ex-slaved society in the U.S. Even though so many years have passed since the end of slavery, emancipation, reconstruction and the civil rights movement, some of the choice terms prejudiced still engraved in the U.S society. When I see such images on the movie screen, it is still hard, even f...
...hat there are some people who he has been jailed with, who he has walked the streets with and those who have risked it all are the ones who paved the way for the others. In paragraph 42 he links everything together. He no longer makes it a simple issue of ethnicity. He has made it an American issue, therefore uniting all Americans together under a common cause.
Since the beginning, the United States` government, racial slavery had conquered various American identities. “Racism sprung early colonial times due the slavery riot incidence misinterpretations, leading full men, women, and children racial slavery of all different ethnic backgrounds” (Hooker 1). African-Americans held a life long work and Caribbean island shipment originating and affective progression to American colonies. “An importation of 4,000,000 Negroes were held in bondage by Southern planters” (Webstine).Advanced time went, and Northern states nurtured a rapid industrial revolution; Factory introduction, machines, and hired workers replaced any agricultural need of existing slaves. Southern states, however, maintained their original work, continuing the previous circular agricultural system. This suited the firm economic foundation of United States government. However, even continuing economic growth, some Americans still recognized moral rights. The moving disagreement era, America’s Antebellum period grew a deep internal struggle within the American society’s families. “Abolitionists, anti-racial discrimination groups, demanded an end to dehumanized labor treatment in the Southern states” (James 94). However, during this time, women discrimination was also another hot topic taking place. These movements pursued, and women joined numerous groups, and became more society perceived, standing with the thousands African-Americans, immigration workers, and women’s rights, demanding their societal rights. One particular woman advocating her own level in society, gender, race, and all, bringing her standing beliefs was Sojourner Truth. A former run away slave, Sojourner Truth, who originally contemplated no Ameri...
Washington’s feelings in regard to national unity encompass a majority of the points in his address. To Washington, the creation of political parties would serve only as a means of breaking the American people away from one another. He feared people would become so consumed in gaining political dominance for their political party that parties would forget or overlook the fact that all of them were still Americans and should be united by this. Washington’s foresight in this matter is an utterly precise prediction of the current political climates in America. The American political arena today appears to be a completely binary system divided between Democrats and Republicans and that views differing from the two are largely ignored. Washington was even able to predict the forming of modern parties “with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations”; this insight seems to hint at his realization at the inevitable split between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. (p. 6) Modern Republicans and Democrats seem much more interested in proving the other party corrupt or inept so that the American...
...t him, that he did not care about the hard work, assimilation, and education so much as he wanted to be popular and equal to the whites. These accusations, though, do not hold up when compared to the actions put forth by Mr. Washington. If a person did not truly stand up for what he believed in, then his actions would prove true to the accusations being brought against him. This was not the case though, and Washington’s actions spoke way louder than his words could have.
Hollywood’s diversity problem is well-known; however, the extent might be surprising to most Americans. According to a 2014 report by the Center for the Study of Women in Television, Film & New Media, found that females comprised only 30% of all speaking characters among the top grossing films of 2013. (Lauzen, 2014) However, minority women faired far worse than their Caucasian counterparts. As a matter of fact, if one looks at the numbers even female characters from other world’s were as better represented in film than some minority women; the numbers are as follow for women: Caucasian (73%), African American (14%), Latina (5%), Asian and other world tied (3%). (Lauzen, 2014) If the lack of representation were not enough consider a 2009 study which found that when minority groups are portrayed on television the portrayal tends to be negative. (Alexandrin, 2009) A study by Busselle and Crandall (2009) found that the manner in which African-Americans are portrayed, often as unemployed criminals, tends to have an influence on the way the public perceives African-American’s lack of economic success. Furthermore, the news media does an equally poor job in the ways that African-American’s are presented; according to the same study while 27% of Americans were considered “poor” in 1996 the images of America’s “poor” being presented by news media was heavily Black (63%). (Busselle & Crandall, 2002) Today, this can be seen in the way that African-American victims of police brutality are depicted in the media. Even when African-Americans are murdered at the hands of police for minor and non-violent offenses (e.g. Mike Brown, Eric Gardner, and Tamir Rice) they are often portrayed as thugs, criminals, and vandals. What’s more, seve...
“They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the ‘storm came and the wind blew.’” Meaning that it's America’s fault that they didn't stand true to their beliefs, and were weak in protecting them, and their beliefs were impractical. He says: “They, were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.” He
Dr. King is saying that we have united ourselves, it is time for us to connect ourselves and live together as a nation. Many minorities lived in America, but they were not considered citizens. Immigrants were prevented from being American citizens because of an act passed in 1882. Women did not have the same rights as men did. They could have been white Americans, but they were not treated the same.
Living between two phrases of slavery and abolishing, Washington could see clearly about the differences between his people and white people. After freedom, he had more chances to do what he wanted. He understood that approaching education was one of the happiest in his life and helped him to open his mind so that he could do greater things. Attending school with other blacks and whites, he realized that there was always a gap between his races with another. He found that there was no equity about judgment between black and white people. It seemed the blacks were always failing when they undertake something. As a young boy, he wanted to do something so that the people must change their mind about his race, which could be recognized as a successful
North America is, and always has been, an ethnically diverse society. Yet this cultural diversity along religious, ethnic and national lines had been tolerated only in a limited degree, end even only on the dominant Anglo-Saxon elite?s terms.? (Eisen and Wiggins, 1994, p. xii). History books repeatedly show this in their pages. A person can not pick up a history book and read through the pages with out finding something on how a particular athlete or group of athletes were persecuted because of their race. Part of the American dream that is taught to our youth of is freedom, equality and the ability to move ahead in life if a person is motivated to do so. It is unfortunate that this isn?t the case; that is unless the person fits into the right sociological group.