What Does It Mean To Say In Lincoln's Cornerstone Speech

607 Words2 Pages

President Abraham Lincoln and Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens had opposite belief systems when it came to what to do with the United States. No slavery vs. Pro-slavery. With far opposing ideals, the two men still grew up in the same country which was founded under one common idea; equality. But is that concept practical or unnecessary?
Abraham Lincoln’s opinion on the creation of the U.S, is stated in his Gettysburg speech. He states: “...a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” By this he means that the actual point of this country was founded upon the concept of equal rights of man, and at birth everybody is dubbed the same rights and freedom as everybody else. But with slavery around, it contradicts everything our nation was supposed to be built upon. …show more content…

“They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the ‘storm came and the wind blew.’” Meaning that it's America’s fault that they didn't stand true to their beliefs, and were weak in protecting them, and their beliefs were impractical. He says: “They, were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.” He
Tippery, 2 means, that the idea of equality is just bull because they're going against God’s will and plan for the people. He believes that God created blacks to be inferior and whites to be superior to them, and there’s no point in changing that.
However, both men agree that equality was the initial value America rested upon when it was first created, and that it has gone to crap. But it's a matter of who wants to bring it back into the minds of the people to put it into action and who wants to make sure it never does surface in the United

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Lincoln's House Divided By Abraham Lincoln

    992 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lincoln was a very smart lawyer and politician. During his “House Divided” speech he asked the question, “Can we, as a nation, continue together permanently, forever, half slave, and half free?" When he first asked this question, America was slowly gaining the knowledge and realizing that as a nation, it could not possibly exist as half-slave and half-free. It was either one way or the other. “Slavery was unconstitutional and immoral, but not simply on a practical level.” (Greenfield, 2009) Slave states and free states had significantly different and incompatible interests. In 1858, when Lincoln made his “House Divided” speech, he made people think about this question with views if what the end result in America must be.

    Read More

  • Cherokee Removal Summary

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the beginning of this speech, he talks about how the “fight” between the Indians and whites was unfair because of the weapons the whites possessed. Despite this, the Indians still believed they had a chance to defend themselves, unfortunately they were no match for the guns. What initiated this fight was the land, belonging to the Indians, that was taken with no regards to the inhabitants. He wanted to explain that Indians were of no harm to the “white society” and wanted to carry on with their own way of life. He feared that Indians will lose their culture and will become similar to whites in a negative sense. Some similarities he lists include lying and hypocrisy, adulterers, lazy, all talk, and

    Read More

  • Analysis of The Disquisition of Government by John Calhoun

    3726 Words  | 8 Pages

    There are three main parts of his argument. The first part of his argument delves into the nature of man and government. This part investigates the role of natural vs. implied rights and it’s role in the creation of a government. The second part of his argument deals with the “concurrent” vs. “numerical” majority, which deals with the ideals of a majority against the ideals of a minority and a numerical faction. The third part of his argument deals with liberty, rights, power and security. I believe this part is most crucial because not everyone is implied to be free, but rather people need to deserve their freedom. This can’t be true, because people on American history because of their race and gender were not allowed to live by some of theories granted in the Disquisition of Government.

    Read More

  • Gettysburg Address versus Letter to His Son

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lee and Lincoln both wrote about how the people are one as stated by the founding fathers. In the constitution it says that all men are created equal. Both sides understood that all white men were equal. The founding father fought for the equality of men. “Four score and seven years ago out fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived...

    Read More

  • Lincoln-Douglas Debate

    925 Words  | 2 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln's position on slavery was the belief that the expansion of it to Free states and new territories should be ceased and that it eventually be abolished completely throughout the country. He believed simply that slavery was morally wrong, along with socially and politically wrong in the eyes of a Republican. Lincoln felt that this was a very important issue during the time period because there was starting to be much controversy between the Republicans and the Democrats regarding this issue. There was also a separation between the north and the south in the union, the north harboring the Free states and the south harboring the slave states. Lincoln refers many times to the Constitution and its relations to slavery. He was convinced that when our founding fathers wrote the Constitution their intentions were to be quite vague surrounding the topic of slavery and African-Americans, for the reason that he believes was because the fathers intended for slavery to come to an end in the distant future, in which Lincoln refers to the "ultimate extinction" of slavery. He also states that the men who wrote the constitution were wiser men, but obviously did not have the experience or technological advances that the men of his day did, hence the reasons of the measures taken by our founding fathers.

    Read More

  • Ethos Pathos Logos In Declaration Of Independence

    561 Words  | 2 Pages

    This quote also appeals to ethos and pathos. By mentioning God, he is able to convince the reader that his cause is just and he is not acting in his own interests, and by using emotionally charged words and phases, such as “created equal”, “endowed by their Creator”, “certain unalienable rights”, and “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”, he makes the reader feel as though they are important, and not just another British subject with no

    Read More

  • The American Dream: Dead, Alive Or On Hold, By Brandon King

    1319 Words  | 3 Pages

    Political battles of today fought with arguments based on the speeches of writings of men dead over a century ago.” Gathering this quote, I am guessing that Clark shares the same beliefs about the government as I do. Present day there are so many corrupt individuals running our government who listen to these teachings. All these people in power currently are white, upper class, privileged men who only want to better themselves. It seems as though nobody wants to do anything to give the lesser privileged people the same opportunities as the upper class. America was built off the idea that everyone is to be treated equal, but clearly that is not the case. Our nation is supposedly the land of the free, which is why all immigrants fled here for this free land of endless opportunities, now our government officials don’t even want immigrants entering. In the past powerful people forced less privileged individuals into slavery so that they could not advance. Nowadays, people of power force its people to live in bad neighborhoods and have a lower education with a lack of opportunities. While on the other hand, the upper class praise other upper-class citizens as well as providing them with all the opportunities and a surplus of advantages that are not needed. These men in power maintain these mindsets full of hate and evil which result in nothing changing or improving for their citizens. These outdated ideas proposed by dead white racist men are now enforced by alive white racist

    Read More

  • Frederick Douglass’ Fourth of July Speech

    1397 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his speech, Frederick Douglass made it clear that he believed that the continued toleration and support of slavery from both a religious and legal standpoint was utterly absurd when considering the ideals and principles advocated by America’s forefathers. He began by praising the American framers of the Constitution, an...

    Read More

  • The Civil Rights Act Of 1866

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    “I am an American; free born and free bred, where I acknowledge no man as my superior, except for his own worth, or as my inferior, except for his own demerit.”

    Read More

  • The Debate Regarding the Freedman's Bureau

    1048 Words  | 3 Pages

    Historians and political theorists have delineated the concept of equality into two categories: the competitive individualist notion of equality of process and the egalitarian ideal of equality of results. The former is concerned with providing a level playing field for all, while the latter focuses on a just distribution resulting from the process. Richard Ellis, in his book American Political Cultures, challenges the Hartzian thesis that historically Americans favored equality of process over equality of results, making them competitive individualists. Ellis argues that “what is exceptional about America is not that it lacked a results-oriented vision of equality but that those who favored equalizing results believed that equal process was a sufficient condition for realizing equal results” (Ellis 1993: 44). In other words, the egalitarian spirit was not absent from American history, but Americans believed that justice would best be served through competition. Ellis is correct in making this fine distinction, yet it is important to note that historical evidence suggests that some factions clearly emphasized equality of results regardless of equality of process. In The Souls of Black Folk, W.E.B. Du Bois’ recounting of the political debate regarding the Freedman’s Bureau, clearly highlights this ideological difference.

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln and Slavery

    1612 Words  | 4 Pages

    He wisely used the issue of slavery to appeal to both the abolitionists and to Negrophobes, Northerners who were afraid of living side-by- side with Negroes and competing with them for jobs. For example, on July 10th of 1959, Lincoln gave a speech in Chicago, a primarily abolitionist town. Lincoln stated that inequality was unnecessary in this country. If all men were created equal then were should look past race, saying, “Let us discard all these things, and unite as one people throughout this land, until we shall once more stand up declaring that all men are created equal” (Hofstadter, pg. 148).

    Read More

  • Interpreting Equality: Thomas Jefferson's Contradictions

    507 Words  | 2 Pages

    The meaning of equality has been expanded since the founding of America when Thomas Jefferson stated in the Declaration of Independence that “…all men are created equal…” However, when he used the word “men” he was specifically referring to property-owning males. Ironically, throughout his life, Jefferson owned hundreds of African American slaves yet in multiple of his writings on American injustices during the Revolution he vilified the fact that the British were sponsoring slave trade to the colonies. Jefferson himself valued slaves and but did not necessarily wanted them to have the equality of a free man. Certain objects constructed Thomas Jefferson’s idea of “men” during the enlightenment time period such as

    Read More

  • The Preservation Of Slavery In Free World

    1050 Words  | 3 Pages

    How is it possible that the New World, started by people who dedicated themselves to liberty and human dignity preserved such an inhuman institute such as slavery? Some could argue that the founding fathers were simply prejudice against the African people, and they believed that they were an inferior race. But according to Edmund Morgan, there were more in depth reasons for keeping slavery in the colonies that would eventually become the United States. He stated that major figures such as Thomas Jefferson, who believed in human equality, saw that was slavery was necessary to keep social and economic order in the young world. Morgan also stated that slavery offset the rebelliousness of the other white laborers and at the same time bring a sense of unity to the white inhabitants of the southern colonies.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    In mentioning the Emancipation Proclamation he shows that our ancestors signed a contract, in which all human beings are created equal, and therefore should be treated in the same way as others. He also visualizes his ideas with visual examples, which everybody can understand. “America has given the black population a bad check, which has come back marked insufficient funds”( I Have a Dream)       In one paragraph of his speech he mentions that the “black population has come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. but we refuse to believe, that the bank of justice is bankrupt and that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation” (316).

    Read More

  • What Was The Purpose Of I Have A Dream Speech

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free”. Which shows how even though the Emancipation Proclamation freed the African Americans from slavery, they still are not free because of segregation. He then transitions to the injustice and suffering that the African Americans face. He makes this argument when he proclaims, “We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream”.

    Read More

More about What Does It Mean To Say In Lincoln's Cornerstone Speech

Open Document