Allegory Of The Cave Analysis

1376 Words3 Pages

The fourth dimension is significantly portrayed throughout visual arts. Artists such as Picasso, Dali, Tony Robin and James Billmyer use the optical illusion of the fourth dimension promptly in their art work. Dimensions orientate the emotion, perception and physicality of an art piece, allowing the viewer to enhance their perception. The mathematical accuracy and understanding of geometry is not only important in the use of the fourth dimension in art, it is the very foundation of art.
Artists use math coincidently, their proportions, negative space, ect, as mathematicians create art through mathematical patterns, algorithms, matrices, ect. Plato’s Allegory of the Cave theory , sets the perfect example of a multi-dimensional perception. The third dimension, the one which society is on, is viewing all that is around us as an imitation of an imitation, perceiving all as a shadow of the real. Where as in the fourth dimension, the sense of Forms is but an illusion, for giving a Form a name doesn’t objectify the Form as its name; one may perceive a shadow of an object they familiarize with and deceive themselves from seeing the real, their misconceive the real as we are prisoners in the third dimension. …show more content…

We are motivated by a desire to complete our subjective experience by inventing new aesthetic and conceptual capabilities. We are not in the least surprised, however, to find physicists and mathmaticians working simultaneously on a metaphor for space in which paradoxical three dimensional experiences are resolved only by four dimensional space. Our reading of the history of culture has shown us that in the development of new metaphors for space artists, physicists, and mathmaticians are usually in step” – Tony

Open Document