All Women Shortlists Essay

550 Words2 Pages

All-women shortlists (AWS) are probably the most controversial gender quota variant ever used in the UK. They were first introduced in 1993 by the Labour Party to increase its commitment to the cause of women in politics. The party strengthened its shortlisting policy requiring to select only female candidates in half of the vacant seats the party was likely to win. Even though this method was declared illegal in 1996 after an appeal of two male Labour members, the party did not overturn the selections that had already been made. Observing Figure 3, the leap in the number of women MPs elected to the House of Commons in the general election held the following year is blatant; this might be explained in part by the Labour policy regarding candidate …show more content…

2010), resulting in a drop in the number of women MPs (Figure 3). This drop sparked a renewed debate on the issue and culminated in the 2002 reform of the Sex Discrimination Act to allow political parties to use AWS to select candidates for parliamentary elections. The 2017 election represents a historic result for women: the number of female MPs is now higher than ever and the Labour Party continues to lead on women’s representation in the House of Commons (Women and Equalities Committee 2017), due in large part to the continuing use of AWS. Although many voters criticize them harshly (Jordan 2014), their success in term of increasing the level of female representation in Westminster is undeniable. AWS’s strategy works within Labour because women are running in seats that have an actual chance of winning. As Kenny (2015) points out, in the 2015 general election “only 34 per cent of its candidates overall were women, but the (Labour) party ran the majority of these candidates (53 per cent) in winnable seats. This meant that the party was able to increase its number of female MPs despite a poor performance at the

More about All Women Shortlists Essay

Open Document