Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abraham lincoln history essay
Abraham Lincoln contribution to the United States
Abraham lincoln impact on the united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abraham lincoln history essay
The most admired president, Abraham Lincoln was a figure of his time, but still stands to this day as a major character whom most admire. However, when someone is loved to every measure, they’re bound to have some who don’t appreciate their integrity, some who absolutely despise them. Whether this is procured from jealousy, hatred, or personal experience, these people are often so determined to destroy because of their own pride. Rewinding, one hundred and forty years ago, to the assassination of Honest Abe, we see that post Civil War times were just beginning; in fact, they had only just begun, as the surrender of Robert E. Lee to Ulysses S. Grant happened a mere five days before John Wilkes Booth shot Lincoln in the head. Though the war …show more content…
had ended, this was a time of political unrest because the North and South had not mended their sores quite yet--it had only been five days! Along with political unrest, there were newly freed slaves trying to find work in a broken country, only angering the South more. Ergo, there were some, such as John Wilkes Booth, who hated Lincoln and conspired against him, thus ending his life unexpectedly. Moreover, after the Civil War had ended, neither the North nor South were in good conditions; one thing everyone could agree on is that they were tired. Considering one of the American ‘ideas,’ of perseverance, this tiredness didn’t get in the way of resentment. Southerners were in despair; they had lost the war, and their land had been destroyed, a lot by Sherman’s March to the Sea. Because of this, many southerners hated Lincoln. Can you believe it? In his time, Lincoln wasn’t admired by the entire population. Citizens of that time, including many Northerners, were angry with Abe, as he was often blamed for the bulk of the war, the United States president was an easy person to blame for the millions who had died. The infamous John Wilkes Booth was the assassin who devastated the country. He was a well-known Northern actor, but was known for his southern sympathies. Considering all the facts aforementioned, he met the criteria of one who despised the president, so Booth gathered a group of conspirators, of whom many were enthusiasts of John Wilkes Booth as an actor. Two of the main men were George Azterodt and Lewis Powell, each was to take a certain role in the killing of the Secretary of State William Seward, the Vice President Andrew Johnson, and the president, Abraham Lincoln. George Azterodt was assigned William Seward, and he did not perform the task which he was supposed to, his fright overtook him. Lewis Powell was to kill the Andrew Johnson, and he partially accomplished his task, as he took a knife to Johnson’s face, but Johnson survived. To the great sadness of the country, John Wilkes Booth assigned himself to the assassination of the beloved president, of which he succeeded. American history is full of stories and memories, all of which shape the country we live in today. There are specific turning points that hold significance, the assassination of our greatest president being one. How ironic that a man who was so loved, could as be so hated! This event, which occurred on April 14, 1864, will forever be remembered because it was the first assassination in American history. This was a time of much discontent and anger in America; it seemed no one got along. However, the end of the Civil War was on mutual terms: that the war needed to end, the soldiers and country in general needed relief. Being a time of many firsts, it was also the first, and hopefully last, Civil War in America. The unique thing about a war among the citizens of one country is, no one really ‘wins.’ This is due to the fact that all casualties are among that country, all devastation is felt there, not half, but all. This in itself is a turning point because as we look back and study this calamitous time, there is an extreme sense of sadness, many realize this can never happen again. The Civil War had just ended, with three percent of the population killed, it was the beginning of a whole new era: reconstruction. How wonderful it would be to have this reconstruction time with such an honest leader, except that that leader’s life was cut short by a self-seeking and hateful man. This surely turned the tide of reconstruction, it plunged the country back into despair, where reconstruction would be halted. In short, this event changed the productivity of reconstruction. So, whether he was liked or not, it changed the course of history in that reconstruction didn’t go as well as it could have. Though the Assassination of Father Abraham obviously had a momentous effect on the country, but it also greatly affected the people of that time, that is to say, it had short-term outcomes.
The divide between the North and South had existed for quite some time, with slavery at the heart of the issue. The war had not only separated the two, but drove a wedge between them. So after Lincoln’s assassination, a further divide was drawn between the North and South, because as many people mourned for the loss, some did rejoice. The fear of another war beginning was in the air, the reason being, the man who instructed the North with honesty and love was gone, no more Lincoln to get in the way. Clearly observed, the Civil War was a devastating blow to the whole country, but the end of the president made this a whole lot worse. Though there were the haters of that time, many demanded Lincoln’s body be brought to their state, many even argued about where he should be buried, recognizing his deep connection to each state. In a sense, many came together in the mourning of the president, as a short-term effect. A prominent short-term outcome was in dealing with the Radical Republicans, who believed in punishing the South. Lincoln had believed in viewing the South as a long lost son, or the prodigal son. With Lincoln gone, many Radical Republicans took over, forcing their ideas, which created even more unrest in the hearts of the American
citizens. A Man Worthy of Remembrance Furthermore, the effects of Honest Abe’s assassination resonate through history and still affect many in various ways today. There is a deep-seated hostility in the south, which is assumed to be made from the Civil War, but more than that, made from the assassination of Lincoln. This is true because Lincoln was not there for the reconstruction of the south, and he would have dealt with the whole situation very delicately and compassionately. Referring back to the Radical Republicans, because of their hostility, the South, or the North, were remade to the benefit of the country, speaking long-term. Recalling Lincoln’s idea of reconstruction, his love for people, if he had been alive, would have shaped the country for the remaining years he would be president. A major long-term effect of this is a warning against anyone who may plan to assassinate or capture the president. Whether or not the president is well-liked, the effects on the country are brutal, as we are still experiencing this hardship today. Consequently, Lincoln is a favorite of the American country, the he wasn’t always, This is clearly shown in the fact that he was assassinated. Though did the evil conspirator, John Wilkes Booth, really accomplish anything on his part? He ended up being executed, on the spot, similar to Osama Bin Laden’s death. This shows how much value is placed on the protection of our president, as he was shot down like a terrorist. Effects, long-term and short-term, were long-enduring and inevitable. Remembering Lincoln is all an American can do now, and through remembering him, observe his integrity, honesty, and compassion which should have shaped our country.
Dilorenzo, Thomas J.. The Real Lincoln: a new look at Abraham Lincoln, his agenda, and an unnecessary war. Roseville, Calif: Prima, 2002
Both sides desired a republican form of government. Each wanted a political system that would “protect the equality and liberty of the individuals from aristocratic privilege and…tyrannical power.” (404) However, the north and south differed greatly in “their perceptions of what most threatened its survival.” (404) The secession by the south was an attempt to reestablish republicanism, as they no longer found a voice in the national stage. Prior to the 1850s, this conflict had been channeled through the national political system. The collapse of the two-party system gave way to “political reorganization and realignment,” wrote Holt. The voters of the Democrats shifted their influence toward state and local elections, where they felt their concerns would be addressed. This was not exclusively an economically determined factor. It displayed the exercise of agency by individual states. Holt pointed out, “[T]he emergence of a new two-party framework in the South varied from state to state according to the conditions in them.” (406) The “Deep South” was repulsed by the “old political process,” most Southerners trusted their state to be the safeguards of republicanism. (404) They saw the presidential election of Abraham Lincoln, a member of the “the anti-Southern Republican party,” as something the old system could not
Disapproval, the Confederacy, and slavery were amongst the many crises Abraham Lincoln faced when addressing his First Inaugural speech (Lincoln, First Inaugural, p.37). Above all, Lincoln’s speech was stepping on the boundaries of the southern slave states. Once states began to secede, new territories formed and the disapproval of Lincoln grew. Despite Lincoln’s attempts of unifying the antislavery and confederate views, many whites refused to follow his untraditional beliefs. Lincoln encountered hostile and admirable emotions from the people of the Union and the Confederacy. However, despite his representation of the Union, not everyone agreed with his views.
In “The Presidency of Abraham Lincoln,” Phillip Shaw Paludan argues that even though Abraham Lincoln faced unparalleled challenges, Lincoln was America’s greatest president as he preserved the Union and freed the slaves. According to Paludan, Lincoln’s greatness exceeds that of all other American presidents as Lincoln’s presidential service was remarkable in both the obstacles he faced as well as the ways in which he overcame them. Before accepting the distinguished chair in Lincoln studies at the University of Illinois, Springfield, Paludan was a professor of history at the University of Kansas for over 30 years. Paludan has authored several books including Victims: A True Story of the Civil War and A People’s Contest: The Union and Civil
In the 1860’s the United States weren’t united because of the issue of slavery. The civil war was never just about getting the union back together, but about making it count and getting rid of slavery. The south wanted their slaves and would say they are “-the happiest, and in some, the freest people in the world”. (Doc 5) However, the north knew that was not true because of Harriet Beecher Stowe's “Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. In 1854 when the Kansas-Nebraska act was passed it caused some issues. Anti-slavery supporters were not happy because they did not want expansion of slavery, but the pro-slavery supporters weren’t happy because they wanted slavery everywhere for sure. (Doc. 7)The Kansas-Nebraska act caused trouble before it was even passed, Senator Charles Sumner argued against and attacked pro-slavery men causing Preston Brooks to beat Sumner with a cane. The south praised Brooks while the north felt for Sumner. (Doc 8) In 1858 during his acceptance speech Lincoln said his famous line, “A house divided
As we can only imagine, one can not erase the vivid images, of the Civil War from their memories, after seeing the fallen bodies and the fields of ash and smoke. The lasting images we view through photographs reminds us of the war that divided the nation, during tumultuous times. As the war came to an end, President Abraham Lincoln was elected for his second term in office. During, Lincoln's second inaugural speech he persuades his audience, to understand that the war was a catastrophe for all. The healing that is needed from this catastrophe will not begin, until the reformation of the once standing brotherhood, in order to, maintain peace and prosperity as a nation. To help persuade the audience, Lincoln's use of rhetorical strategies, evokes the audience to consolidate as one.
One thing that Lincoln and Lee both had in common was that they wanted this civil war to be over as soon as possible. When we are reading through Lincoln’s speech you realize everything that has happened. 51,000 people died in three days. There was nowhere to put all of the body’s; nothing to do to clean the ground of all the blood that had spilled. When you really think about all the people that died at this battle it is horrific and to think that this is just one of the battles t...
The assassination of Lincoln was planned and carried out by the well known stage actor John Wilkes Booth, as part of a larger conspiracy to revive the Confederate cause. Booth's co-conspirators were Lewis Powell and David Herold. They were assigned to kill William H. Seward. George Atzerodt was supposed to kill Vice President Andrew Johnson.
. .’, concludes James Oakes’ book with the aftermath of the Civil War and Lincoln’s assassination. Oakes discussed the respect Douglass gathered for Lincoln over the years and the affect his assassination had on both himself and America as a whole. Oakes even brushed over Douglass’ relationship with Andrew Johnson, the president succeeding Lincoln. Analyzing his experience with the new president, it was safe to say that Andrew Johnson had no consideration as to what Douglass and Lincoln previously fought for. Johnson did not have the same political skills as Lincoln did, and he did not retain the same view for America that Lincoln did. It was obvious that Douglass held Lincoln at a higher standard than Andrew Johnson, stating that he was a “progressive man, a humane man, an honorable man, and at heart an anti-slavery man” (p. 269). Oakes even gave his own stance on Andrew Jackson, “It was a legacy that Andrew Johnson could ever match. When all of Lincoln’s attributes were taken into consideration - his ascent from the obscurity to greatness, his congenial temperament, his moral courage - it was easy for Douglass to imagine how much better things would be ‘had Mr. Lincoln been living today’.” (p. 262). It is hard to imagine the pre-war Douglass to have said something like that as opposed to an older, much more reserved Douglass. With the abolishment of slavery, so came much discrimination. Without
On April, 14 1865 President Abraham Lincoln was shot while watching a performance of An American
The memory of massive death was still in the front of everyone’s mind, hardening into resentment and sometimes even hatred. The south was virtually non-existent politically or economically, and searching desperately for a way back in. Along with these things, now living amongst the population were almost four million former slaves, who had no idea how to make a living on their own. They had been freed by the 13th amendment in 1865, and in the future became a great concern to many political leaders. Still, it was no secret that something had to be done. So, as usually happens, political leaders appeared on the stage, each holding their own plan of Reconstruction, each certain their ideas were the correct ones. One of the first people who came up with a blueprint for Reconstruction was the president at the time, Abraham Lincoln. The “Lincoln Plan” was a very open one, stating that after certain criteria were met a confederate state could return to the union. To rejoin, a state had to have ten percent of voters both accept the emancipation of slaves and swear loyalty to the union. Also, those high ranking officers of the state could not hold office or carry out voting rights unless the president said
As you can imagine the assassination of Lincoln greatly influenced the relationship between the north and the south. The assassination soured their relationship, increasing the north’s hate toward the south (The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln pg.51). Even before the north even knew who killed Lincoln, they blamed the south. The north mourned whereas the south was happy (History Engine). In the north, not only whites, but blacks too mourned for their fallen president (History Engine). In the south most were happy, but not all of them (History Engine). Some southerners joined with the north in their sadness and sorrow. The ones who mo...
Over the course of the 1860’s the hostility between the North and the South grew into an insipid relationship that only dragged on until the succession of North Carolina in 1860. The main disagreements that led to the Civil War grew over political differences. The issue of Federal versus State rights, stirred the question over how much power the government should possess, similarly the abolition movement clashed with the expansion of slavery in the South and after the elections that would inaugurate President Lincoln without one vote from a single southern state in 1861 the South was fully aware over the balance of power that was not present withi...
Contrary to what today’s society believes about Lincoln, he was not a popular man with the South at this time. The South wanted to expand towards the West, but Lincoln created a geographical containment rule keeping slavery in the states it currently resided in. Despite his trying to rationalize with the South, Lincoln actually believed something different ”Lincoln claimed that he, like the Founding Fathers, saw slavery in the Old South as a regrettable reality whose expansion could and should be arrested, thereby putting it on the long and gradual road ”ultimate extinction” (216). He believed it to be “evil” thus “implying that free southerners were evil for defending it”(275). Lincoln wanted to wipe out slavery for good, and the South could sense his secret motives.
A number of the decisions and actions undertaken not only during the course of Jackson’s presidency, but also as a pre-political individual alone, depict a man certainly capable of a villainous description. While one could attempt to describe Andrew Jackson as a hero, one would be required to ignore repeatedly documented events and personal accounts to the contrary. However, a successful counterargument resides in the fact that, in trivial terms, history is not black-and-white. Oftentimes, history is perceived through two viewpoints. The first observes history where morals and beliefs are not entered into the equation. To use American history as a template, many historical figures, such as Thomas Jefferson or Abraham Lincoln, are represented as unblemished and faultless; the focus is primarily placed on intelligent, influential quotes and political achievements. The second viewpoint represents the same individuals as flawed and human, straying far from the untarnished and blameless leaders of the first example; through the second point-of-view, personal dealings and character reside at the core. Neither of these methods of studying history is necessarily false, as neither promotes false information. However, within itself, history is unbiased, and the legacy of America’s seventh president lies in between these two often-employed viewpoints. As