Aaron Douglas's Four Illustrations To Fire !

536 Words2 Pages

Aaron Douglas illustrated many of the Harlem Renaissance’s most famous writings, but he was much more than an illustrator. Griffin in her article focuses on the Renaissance publication Fire! where Douglas not only contributed artistic work but also designed and conceived it. Fire! was published November 1926 and while it was very short-lived it continues to be important literary and artistic representation of the Harlem Renaissance. The publication sprung from a group of young educated urban artist: Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston, Wallace Thurman, Richard Bruce Nygent, Gwendolyn Bennett, Aaron Douglas, Arthur Huff Fauset, countee Cullen and Arna Bontemps. After being chastised by the older generation produced Fire! as a “journal containing …show more content…

Among the illustrations are the cover and a series of three pictures nestled in between a story of interracial love and betrayal and a story about a bisexual. The series of three pictures are their own story. Douglas diverges from the techniques of his more popular work using a style of uninterrupted lines; neither silhouettes nor shadows. The first two drawings depict a preacher and an artist. They appeared as mirrors to each other on adjoining pages of the journal. The body language of the minister and the artist mimic each other. Each man has their arm bent across their body breaking the vertical lines. With their similar look and mannerisms Douglas is portraying the two men as kindred spirits both as guides of the people. Douglas is portraying them as an extension of the ordinary African American. Douglas portrays them at their best “unrestricted, free of constraint and in so doing, affirms their messy, complicated, sometimes beautiful, sometimes ugly humanity.” This along with the rest of Fire! was controversial. The third picture in the series was that of a waitress. A portrayal of the new urban working class woman she is softer and less serious but linked in posture. The waitress looks to be more sensual and less controlled by the minister evoking the discussion of the Harlem Renaissance’s portrayal of the new working

Open Document