Aaron David Gordon Analysis

1711 Words4 Pages

Aaron David Gordon (1856-1922) was a Zionist ideologue who immigrated from Vilna in Lithuania to Palestine in 1904. He was a member of the pre-Zionist movement Lovers of Zion, who advocating revival of Jewish life in the Eretz Yisrael, and formulated a philosophy of physical work where he expressed that only through labor could the Jews regain national rebirth and unity as a people. In this paper I shall study a broad selection of Gordon’s essays to show how Gordon establishes the ideal of working the land in the Yishuv by using and reinforcing the collective memory of the Zionist movement about the Diaspora. By building on the Zionist discourse which negates the Diaspora, Gordon establishes a negative Jewish identity of the past as a contrast to the positive identity, he envisions for the Jewish people in the future. Gordon’s ideal of working the land functions to emphasize the desolate existence of the Jews in the Diaspora, where he claims they were estranged from labor and nature. Simultaneously, the image of the weak Jews in the Diaspora consistent in Zionist rhetoric of the time, enforces Gordon’s vision of a strong Jewish people in the Yishuv.
Coming from a religiously observant family, Gordon studied with the local rabbi, yet simultaneously became proficient in several languages and studied secular topics such as the philosophy of Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Marx and Tolstoy (Schweid 1985: 157). He remained Orthodox all his life, yet during his years in Palestine he moved away from traditional Judaism to form his own philosophy about the connection between the nation, nature and labor. His views on the necessity of manual labor is grounded in his religious views, and thus have been named the “religion of labor”. In thi...

... middle of paper ...

...lized, empowered and disempowered. The most basic binary pair in identity creation is the distinction between ‘us’ and ‘them’. The ‘other’ is an essential component of any group’s project of self-definition (Barth: 15). Most sociological studies of groups self-identity an boundary creation deals with the relationship between two different groups within the same period and vicinity. However, in Gordon’s essays the binary pair is between the ‘us’ of the future and the ‘them’ of the past; As will be evident further on in my analysis Gordon establishes the Jewish diasporic past as an anti-thesis to the Jewish future in the Yishuv. Gordon builds his creation of the Jewish diasporic identity on the discourse used within Zionism, and establishes the future as the opposite. Throughout my analysis I will show how Gordon effectually establishes these two opposing identities.

Open Document