Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of erik erikson theory
The importance of erik erikson theory
The importance of erik erikson theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A Thematic Analysis on Lifespan Development of a Couple
WITH REAL LIFE EXPERIENCES OF A COUPLE
The aim of this research is to explore a married couple’s real life
experiences and the possible influences that affect their life
development. A qualitative thematic analysis was carried out on
pre-existing material of three semi-structured interviews and a
video. Two main themes were identified : Various Influences and
Changeable. This analysis showed support for some research done
regarding Erikson’s development stages, Peck’s contribution on later
life, developmental contextualism and Bronfenbrenner’s theory. The
findings suggest that life development is multi-facet. A reflexive
analysis reviews some limitation on this analysis and recommendations
are also made.
INTRODUCTION
============
Lifespan development is the one among different psychological
perspectives. Psychologists are of different views on human
development. Some of them split human development into different
stages, some of them focus on the people’s later development, some are
optimistic but some not, and some opined that our development are
deterministic but also some do not think so.
Erik Erikson has developed a theory named as Psychosocial in which he
stated that there would be eight development stages from birth to
later adulthood within our life. (Cooper & Roth, 2002). The theory
emphasised that our development is a product of the interaction
between the society and individual; and our parents seems to play a
key role in our early life. Erikson argued that everyone must develop
throughout these eight stages.
While treating later ...
... middle of paper ...
...ay not what
exactly I think due to cultural influence.
Therefore, in future studies, I would recommend that there is no
pre-existing relationship between the interviewers and the
interviewees. Videotaped interview is considered appropriate, but the
crew members should be released, because I consider they will affect
the interviewees’ emotion. To reflect the content more precisely, it
is also suggest that the studies should be done by native students,
such arrangement could lower the cultural difference.
ReferenceS
Miell, D., Phoenix, A., and Thomas, K. (2002).
Mapping Psychology 1 (Book 1). Milton Keynes : The Open University
Press
Cooper, T., and Roth, I. (2002).
Challenging Psychological Issues. Milton Keynes : The Open University
Press
Methods Booklet 5. The Open University Press
The series demonstrates this through Jane’s unexpected parenthood, her relationship issues with Rafael, and finally choosing the career path she wants to pursue. The series also applies the developmental theories and concepts from developmental psychology in a way that can easily be related to real life situations. From family planning not going as expected, to parenthood difficulties, to relationship issues with significant others, to choosing a field to have a career in, many people face these issues and overcome them. Many couples have unplanned children that temporarily throw their lives out of balance, as well as having issues in relationships or being indecisive with career options. Though society plays a role in how people decide to live their lives, ultimately, young adulthood is a time of individual discovery and
For my reflection paper I chose to write about chapter 9 that talks about lifespan development. This chapter grabbed my attention and I found it most interesting. In the textbookit discusses how there are certain factors that uncontrollably make us who we are. Those factorsare "unique combination of genes you inherited from your biological mother and father. Another is the historical era during which you grew up. Your individual development has also been shaped by the cultural, social, and family contexts within which you were raised." (Pg.352) The patterns of our lives are because of developmental psychology. "Developmental psychology is a scientific approach which aims to explain growth, change and consistency though the lifespan. Developmental
Both Erik Erikson’s (1963) theory and Mary Ainsworth and John Bowlby (1973) theory support the idea that early life experiences impact the person across their lifespan. Both theories believe that personality begins to develop from a young age and therefore occurrences in early life can have lasting impacts on the developmental of an individual. An individual’s social and psychological development is significantly influenced by early life and childhood experiences. The experiences an individual has as a child impacts on the development of social skills, social behaviours, morals and values of an individual.
This reaction paper will be on pairing number four. We watched a total of two videos for this pairing: Video one was called Marriage and Family, and video number two was called Family and Household. Both of these videos had my complete attention, as did the class discussions. I found this pairing to be the greatest attention-grabber so far. A few of the key topics that I was the utmost engaged in and would like to react to in this paper would happen to be, dowry verse bride price, the economics between a man and women in a marriage, and lastly, polygamy in marriages throughout other cultures.
Eric Erikson was one of the most famous theorists of the twentieth century; he created many theories. One of the most talked about theories is his theory of psychosocial development. This is a theory that describes stages in which an individual should pass as they are going through life. His theory includes nine stages all together. The original theory only included eight stages but Erikson‘s wife found a ninth stage and published it after his death. The nine stages include: trust vs. mistrust, autonomy vs. shame and doubt, initiative vs. guilt, industry vs. inferiority, identity vs. identity confusion, intimacy vs. isolation, generativity vs. stagnation, integrity vs. despair, and hope and faith vs. despair (Crandell and Crandell, p.35-36)).
Life span development is “The concept of the lifelong process of development that is studied scientifically.” (Papalia, 2012, 5). I chose to observe the development on an individual named Zyrion Williams. Zyrion is African American boy, born in February of 2013. He is a very energetic toddler that is 2 years old (31 months). Zyrion family structure consists of a nuclear family. “Nuclear family is a household unit consisting of one or two parents and their children, whether biological, adopted, or stepchildren.” (Papalia, 2012, 11). He is raised by his mother, who is a single parent, and he also has an older brother that is 7 years old. To encourage his development he is currently attending daycare. Lapetite Academy is a childcare center where
The interview provides a report of the developmental stages of a 32-year old female, who has never married, two children, and living with her fiancé and stepchildren. The interview focuses on individual growth and the quality of lifespan formation during her current age. The subject of the interview presents with questions concerning development levels such as physical growth, motor skills, cognitive development, emotional development, language development, and social development. The eight questions layout and document a clear supportive analysis of the subject growth and development; compare to others her age and the text.
His theory “emphasized the role of culture and society and the conflicts that can take place within the ego itself” (McLeod, 2008). Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development has eight stages. The seventh stage is generativity vs. stagnation; it includes midlife adults between the ages of forty and sixty. “Generativity is in which people in midlife find meaning from nurturing the next generation, care for others or enriching the lives of others through their work. Stagnation is when midlife adults have not achieved generativity. They tend to feel without a sense of purpose in life” (Belsky, 2016, p. 363). A key factor to this stage is parenting. The big question that is asked is, does this midlife adult have the capability to educate the next generation? (Cramer, Flynn, LaFave,
To answer the question, “How does marrying before the age of 21 and starting a family affect the relationships of the couple and children as they grow older?”, the best theoretical perspective to use is the Family Life Course Development Framework. The textbook’s definition of this perspective is that families are followed through fairly typical states in the life course, such as through marriage, childbirth, states of raising children, adult children’s leaving home, retirement, and possible widowhood (pg. 505).
One of the things I remember from childhood is the innocent, if not irritating, repetition of four-line songs on the playground. One lyric in particular seems to have embedded itself in my memory and lasted through the years: “First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes the baby in a baby carriage.” I am sure most of my fellow college students remember it well.
Erik Erikson developed the eight stages of life theory. Erikson’s theory focuses on the development from birth to death, social context, and interpersonal relations during each stage of life (McAdams, 2009). In the same manner, each stage of life is comprehendible in three levels, such as the body, ego, and family and culture. The eight stages of life are infancy (trust vs. mistrust), early childhood (autonomy vs. shame and doubt), childhood (initiative vs. guilt), childhood (industry vs. inferiority), adolescence and young adulthood (identity vs. role confusion), young adulthood (intimacy vs. isolation), mature adulthood (generativity vs. stagnation (or self-absorption)), and old age (ego integrity vs. despair).
The four main sections in this chapter includes the life-span perspective (sums up how development can be affected by age, history, and life events), the nature of development (the key, distinctive periods where biological, cognitive, and socio emotional processes influence different, specific age periods along with how nature vs. nurture will also create the impact), theories of development (psychoanalytic, cognitive, behavioral and social cognitive, ethological, ecological, and electric theoretical orientation), and lastly, how research is made for life-span development (how data collection works, research criteria’s, time spent on research, and how to conduct research without bias
Marriage has existed longer than written history and there still a great demand. Over half of the adult population in the United States is married which consists of over 2 million people. At some point, two thirds of all Americans heterosexual or homosexual will vow to better or for worse till death do us apart. Despite, the recent decreased in the amount of people to get married, it’s still at a soaring 80 percent. Marriage is an integral part of who we are as humans but the real question is that because of evolutionary development or creation by God. These two belief systems play a fundamental role in the way we understand and live out marriage. The first view is evolutionary development which believes that marriage wasn't created by God and it was not originated in the beginning, however it was develop by society in the context culture. Therefore, concluding that marriage was a human institution invested throughout history as a way to carry out social roles. The second view would fall under the biblical view. Marriage is not of human origin, because it began with the Creator God. It was created by God from the beginning of history when He created the heavens and the earth . As the Creator of marriage, God has the right to tell us which rules should control marriage. Tim Keller affirms this in his book Meaning of Marriage; “Marriage is God’s idea. It is certainly also a human institution and it reflects the character of the particular human culture in which it is embedded. But the concept and roots of human marriage are in God’s own action, and therefore what the Bible says about God’s design for marriage is crucial.” Marriage is one of the most important institution in the world we living, however there is a...
My fiance and I display a mixture of relationship styles, both traditional and independent. Devito states in “Messages” that a traditional couple “sees themselves as blending of two persons into a single couple” (p.22), and an independent couple sees themselves as relatively androgynous (p.22). For example, we have a traditional view of marriage and how a couple acts in the marriage--we have a biblical view of things. However, because we are students, we tend to be independent from one another. He is involved in many things at school that I am not involved in, and vice versa. We have different majors, but we will share a home and a life together, and I think it will be interesting to see how we balance our personal lives with our married lives.
In light of this research, it appears that children born to cohabiting couples are more vulnerable to being raised by parents who will eventually separate considering commitment decline and the ease in which their parents can end the relationship because it is not legally binding. As previously mentioned, one benefit of marriage to society is having a stable environment for children to be raised. However, cohabitation, which is a far more flexible commitment than marriage with fewer safeguards, is steadily becoming an American cultural norm. If this trend continues, a result could be more children raised in unmarried, potentially unstable households with parents’ who may not have a long-term commitment toward one another. This occurrence leaves children more vulnerable to the negative outcomes mentioned above, further stressing the necessity for promotion of marriage and marriage stability.