A Re-Evaluation Of Dee In Susan Farrell's Everyday Use

706 Words2 Pages

Susan Farrell in her, “Fight vs. Flight: A Re-evaluation of Dee in Alice Walker’s ‘Everyday Use’” writes in response to Alice Walker’s short story Everyday Use. Farrell’s article is published by Newbury College in spring of 1998 in Studies in Short Fiction (179). Farrell in her article writes to argue that although Dee is inconsiderate and egotistical—supporting what she is arguing against— to a certain degree, she offers a way for a modern African American to manage with the harsh society that is, in a few ways more substantial than that described by Mother and Maggie— which is her thesis (179). Most people who have read Walker’s short story Everyday Use are prone to agree that the character Dee is ‘shallow,’ ‘condescending,’ and ‘manipulative,’; …show more content…

She seems to have a good understanding of the story and has done a fair share of research to prove her point. She re-evaluates Dee from a different perspective and makes reasonable points; additionally, she uses myriads other writers to back her view of Dee with credible sources. She has included a reference page and she seems to have experience in this field considering she has worked many other stories, as well. The article is well organized and it makes sense but she brings of Walker’s Meridian and gives one page summarizing what happens in that story just to make one simple connection. Farrell brings up that short story to relate Dee and Maggie, “Meridian shares much in common with Maggie” (184). A point which could be made in a sentence or two, she decides to commit an entire page. Farrell’s thesis is very clear and readers can understand that she is playing the devil’s advocate by arguing against all who dislikes the character Dee. She blatantly states that “I will argue that this popular view is far too simple” and is simply based on just feelings alone rather than logic and reasoning (179). Throughout the article, her thesis is supported through by more than just her thoughts alone. One read of the thesis and the reader can easily say that this author is supporting Dee rather than just say she is selfish. She also gives reasons as to why Dee is the way she is rather than just stating that the saying side is

Open Document