More handpicked essays just for you.
Harlem renaissance zora neale hurston & langston hughes
Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston
Harlem renaissance zora neale hurston & langston hughes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Reading Assignment #4 (Hughes & Hurston’s, “A Mule Bone”) This week’s reading was about Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston’s, “A Mule Bone”. This play expresses many conflicts that go on in small as well as large communities. The setting of this play however is in Eaton, Florida is the community in which Hurston is from. It describes the many conflicts that people have with certain relationships or religions. I think I agree with how the play was written. I believe it was written to relay a message to its readers on relationships and how they can explode in a fast manner. For example, the relationship that Jim and Dave had was ruined because on girl named Daisy. And because of her talking to both men it caused Jim to be considered guilty
Zora Neale Hurston's "Sweat" is a short story rich in moral and religious parallels. This story is about a common African- American working woman in the deep South and how she clings to her faith in God to see her through the hardships caused by her faithful and abusive husband. Throughout this story there is religious symbolism that characterizes Delia and Sykes Jones as two people on opposite ends of the moral spectrum yet bound by marital vows that have lost their meaning.
In conclusion I think that the stage directions and dramatic irony are significant to the play, and without them there would be no need for a lot of the events that happen in the play.
In “Sweat” by Zora Neale Hurston, tells the tale, in which author uses literary analysis and symbolism to empathize the character of Delia’s horrific journey coming to an end in a karmic fashion. Hurston’s parents were former slaves, however, slavery was long abolished during her time. Hurston gave importance to education for which she worked various jobs earned associate degree from Howard University in 1920 (Zora Neale). Hurston’s “Sweat” was influenced by her life in Harlem Renaissance. During that era, where Hurston grew up in town called Eatonville was primarily predominantly owned by “white folks” (Turner). The African-American that lived in Eatonville used to visit across the railroad tracks to white folk’s houses to cook, clean and watch over their children (Wohlpart). ‘Sweat’ is influenced not only by Hurston’s childhood town but also her relationship with her employer, Fannie Hurst (Wohlpart). Hurston met the writer Hurst at Opportunity’s award dinner, May 1, 1925, one year prior to the writing of ‘Sweat’ (Wohlpart). Hurst hired Hurston as a live-in secretary, Hurston felt dependent on Fannie Hurst’s white patronage for recognition, much like Delia did in ‘Sweat’ (Turner), and saw her patron as a restriction to her art (Wohlpart). “Sweat” (Turner) gives a glimpse of African-American women’s life and their anguish shown in Delia’s character through literary devices and symbolism used by Hurston’s life experiences.
Brent confronts her reader one on one in order to reemphasize her point. She uses the family and sentiment to appeal to and challenge the 19th century white women reader in order to effectively gain their support in the movement for abolition. Understanding what was going on in our nation, in the southern states, and in the northern states is incredibly important when reading this story. Slaves were nothing more than property and, in many cases, were treated with less respect than the family dog.
This play shows that lying is wrong and will get you nowhere. At the end, lying will come back and haunt you. Also, lying will get you known as a liar. A liar who no one will believe at the end of the day. A liar that will be hard to be trusted by others. All of this is something that you want to avoid. Never lie and always tell the truth and you will end up feeling better about yourself. That is what I ended up getting from this ten minute play. Never lie because all those lies will be stored somewhere, maybe not recorded on tape like they were for the Person but stored somewhere like ones conscious. Lies will come back soon or later to come and bite you when you least expect it.
A dialectic is the process of synthesizing truth by holding contradictory ideas in tension. Since Richard Wright’s short story “Long Black Song” and Zora Neale Hurston’s short story “Sweat” have opposing arguments they must engage in a dialectic. Both stories examine the oppression of the African American race, but they find different sources for its difficulties and demise. In “Long Black Song”, Silas, while expressing his frustration for the superiority of the white men, articulates that the black woman is the source of African American difficulties. In “Sweat”, Sykes’s encounter with death reveals that the African American man’s arrogance is the cause of the demise of the African American race. Wright’s short story “Long Black Song” and Hurston’s short story “Sweat” engage in a dialectic, in which “Sweat” repudiates “Long Black Song”, and produce the truth that one’s hubris that is the source of the difficulties of one’s race and the demise of oneself.
My least favorite aspect of this play was the ending. The ending confused me and was anticlimactic. It was not funny and not entertaining at all.
The theme of the play has to do with the way that life is an endless cycle. You're born, you have some happy times, you have some bad times, and then you die. As the years pass by, everything seems to change. But all in all there is little change. The sun always rises in the early morning, and sets in the evening. The seasons always rotate like they always have. The birds are always chirping. And there is always somebody that has life a little bit worse than your own.
The main character in Zora Neale Hurston’s “Sweat” is a black woman who resides in the South that clutches on to her belief in God to help her get through the suffering that she endures from her abusive and adulterous husband, Sykes. “Sweat” is full of religious symbolism that demonstrates that Hurston was using the theme of good vs. evil in the short story.
The technique he provided did not lose the main focus of the overall message, the importance of family bonding. Because the dialogue between the play and the movie were almost similar, the audience were engaged into the plot scene. Newman provided the same background setting as Williams did to help Tom recollect his thoughts he encountered. This provides us a more understanding of his distort past of his life. The movie brought the play to life that gives the characters vivid and unimaginable emotions. The audience realizes that the movie visualizes the characters character and dialogue than the movie. The movie would only confused the reader if he or she do not understand how the the originality of the play was distributed By getting a sense of the text and the film, the audience can identify various resemblance from the play in the film. “Oh! I felt so weak I could barely keep on my feet! I had to sit down while they got me a glass of water! Fifty dollars’ tuition, all of our plans, my hopes and ambitions for you, just gone up the spout, just gone up the spout like that." Both productions blind Amanda into what Tom and Laura actually want, therefore, failing Amanda’s initial plans of hope for the children’s future ahead of them. The use of the quotes from the text was approximately the same that helps us distinguish the feeling expressed by the character. “We have to be making some plans and provisions for her. She 's older than you, two years, and nothing has happened. She just drifts along doing nothing. It frightens me terribly how she just drifts along." The tone in both production was very serious and worried, providing the concern of Amanda in regards to the children 's future. It is not what is best for Amanda, it is what is best for the children. They both want to walk around peaceful with their lives without a worry in their path. It
When you read this play, take special care to remember the difference between the work of a playwright and that of a novelist. Novelists may imagine their audience as an individual with book in band, but a playwright writes with a theater full of people in mind. Playwrights know that the script is just the blueprint from which actors, producers, stagehands, musicians, scenic designers, make-up artists, and costumers begin. You will need to use an extra measure of imagination to evaluate this play before you see the Goodman production.
In this play, the men and women characters are separated even from their first entrance onto the stage. To the intuitive reader (or playgoer), the gender differences are immediately apparent when the men walk confidently into the room and over to the heater while the women timidly creep only through the door and stand huddled together. This separation between genders becomes more apparent when the characters proceed in investigating the murder. The men focus on means while the women focus on motive: action vs. emotion. While the men...
Plot: Miller chooses to start the plot late into the actual story. Like in Aristolian or climatic drama, many actions have already taken place. The “disappearance” of Larry, the trial of Joe Keller, the incarceration of Herbert Deever, and the courting between Chris and Ann have already taken place. The plot takes place in one locale: the backyard and porch of the Keller residence. The unity of action has events revealed in chronological order and misses very little action between acts. The past is only referenced to and no flashbacks disrupt the flow of the drama. Miller uses these three unities that are prevalent in Greek drama to help to clearly reveal the actions of the play in a distinct time and place. Miller perhaps chooses to start the play later into the story to mirror ancient Greek drama. This lets the audience be ignorant of past events and as the details are revealed, they build tension and mystery that enthralls the audience. The message of the show (and the moment of Catharsis) would be ruined if the audience already knew that Keller was responsible for much suffering.
...For many authors, to take so much as a word out of their work it is destroying it. For plays though, it is meant for words to be changed and added, but not for whole plots and sub-plots. To take out such a big section of a play is disastrous because it leaves the reader and audience with unanswered questions. The sub-plots add to the plot complexity, let the audiences become more involved, and let them all leave feeling that they had seen some characteristic of themselves in the play. This is what makes a play great, and makes the audience want to see it over and over again. Even a seemingly needless character can relate to someone. The more sub-plots (ones that are well worked into the play) the more people that can relate, the better the play.
of interest to the play making it a great play to read and also act