A Lesson Before Dying Literary Analysis

884 Words2 Pages

In American society, receiving an education leads to higher probabilities of achieving economic success and social acceptance. While many believe that education consists of strictly academic learning, they forget that people must also learn morals. American literature repeatedly expresses this idea. For example, in Huck Finn, a young, uneducated boy learns to thrive in the world around him by receiving a moral education as he learns life lessons through his interactions with other people and experiences. In A Lesson Before Dying, Gaines utilizes various story elements and literary devices to illustrate the importance of not only academic education, but also moral and social education to allow different people to contribute knowledge about life …show more content…

An example of the limitations placed on Grant by his society includes his occupation as teacher being the highest-level job he can get with his level of academic schooling. He says, “I had told her I was no teacher, I hated teaching, and I was just running in place here” (Gaines 15). In this community, Grant feels he cannot make a difference as he continues to teach children who are also prevented from using their education to rise up in society. By using the metaphor of running in place, Gaines explains how Grant feels trapped, and as he tries to use his academic education to advance in life, he is unable to do so because of the limitations of his society. As a result, Grant’s education acts as more of a burden to him than a helpful tool. Another example of this occurs when Grant speaks to white men. In this situation, Grant plans his actions, thinking, “To show too much intelligence would have been an insult to them. To show a lack of intelligence would have been a greater insult to me” (47). The parallel sentence structure used here greater emphasizes the predicament Grant constantly has to deal with in his society. Consistently, Grant feels the need to hide his education, the very thing that makes him feel special and important. Because of this, Grant’s academic education seems cumbersome to him and does not contribute to his individual growth …show more content…

Though Grant knows much academically, he does not know the important values of life, including how to be a man. “Do I know what a man is? Do I know how a man is supposed to die? I’m still trying to find out how a man should live” (31). Grant realizes for the first time in a long time that he does not understand something and must learn it. By his use of parallel structure, Gaines stresses Grant’s new realization of his lack of knowledge about manhood as well as his dilemma for passing that absent knowledge on to Jefferson. Grant, in the end, teaches Jefferson about manhood and morality, including exemplifying a hero by being brave and “do[ing] anything for people he loves, because he knows it would make their lives better” (191). Grant’s academic education contributes little towards helping Jefferson become a man. Therefore, Gaines utilizes the story elements of Grant’s task to educate Jefferson morally in order to show the significance of understanding life values in addition to

Open Document