9/11: The Ineffectiveness Of Airport Aviation

1413 Words3 Pages

On September 11, 2001, four U.S. commercial jets had been hijacked by nineteen terrorists on the exact same day. More than three thousand people were died (“Airport security”, 2014). The attack happened because of the ineffectiveness of the security at airports. Consequently, the airport security in every country was tightened further. People will have to wait in a long line and will be asked to show their ID cards and passports several times before they can finally reach their gates. The opponents claim that the effectiveness of the security is not worth its enormous cost. Studies have found that airport security is ineffective, invasive, incompetent, and inexcusably costly (Mann, 2013). Many terrorists have passed through the airport …show more content…

However, because of terrorist attacks, this type of transportation is no longer considered safe. Terrorism has been one of the main issues since air travel is emerged to the public. One of the biggest terrorist events is the 9/11 attack. On September 11, 2001, one of the biggest terrorist attacks happened. Four airplanes were hijacked by nineteen terrorists and were turned into flying bombs. The total death was up to three thousand (“The 9/11 terrorist attack”, 2014). After that event, the security in airports has become a major interest for every country. Hence, the security in every airport had become stricter. Some of the main airport security requirements are that passengers need to be scanned with metal detectors in order to prevent hijackers carrying weapons in each flight. All baggage and passengers’ personal belongings are required to be checked by x-ray scanners. Furthermore, all passengers are required to whether be checked by full-body scanners or let the airport officers perform pat-down (“Airport security”, 2014). Airports security inventions include Advanced Imaging Technology, Credential Authentication Technology, Explosives Detection System, Biometrics, and Bottled Liquids Scanners (Transportation Security Administration [TSA], 2014). Many inventions are being used to create reliability on this transportation …show more content…

Both full-body scanner and pat-down performance directly violate passengers’ right of privacy. Since the old security machine such as metal detector had been completely replaced by full-body scanner, yet the way to check passengers without violating personal right is not yet to be found (Edzent, 2010). The full-body scanner allows the screeners to view passengers’ naked body to ensure that they do not have any weapon hiding under their clothes. However, letting peoples see other peoples naked body is clearly violate their privacy. Full-body scanner is explained by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as a virtual strip-search which is definitely outrage passengers ’right of privacy (“Airport security”, 2014). The images that are presented by this machine are nothing but pornography. Passengers’ breasts and genitals can be clearly displayed by this machine. Even though the images are shown at the machine that locates in the separated room, screeners with cell phone cameras can easily take all the pictures. Moreover, pat-down performance allows screeners and guards to touch passengers’ body parts including breasts, genitals and others rightfully (“Airport security”, 2014). This performance can be considered as a pervert act. In addition, airport officers can unlock or ask passengers to open their bags and personal belonging for an additional

Open Document