1960s Memphis

948 Words2 Pages

In March of 1968, “I AM A MAN” would have seemed like a rather innocuous declaration. However, for sanitation workers in Memphis, Tennessee, it was a rallying cry that had implications that went far beyond a local labor dispute. Laurie B. Green’s extraordinarily insightful article, “Race, Labor, and Gender in 1960s Memphis: ‘I Am a Man’ and the Meaning of Freedom” published in Journal of Urban History, goes back to that time that came to symbolize the issues in America during the late 1960s and were rooted in the founding and a failed Post-Civil War Reconstruction. She considered the events that took place in Memphis during the 1950s and 1960s within a much bigger historical context. They brought to the public the other social problems …show more content…

The article makes compelling connections between the “plantation mentality” that characterized the American South from its earliest days through the Civil War and beyond (Green 467). As the article points out, with few exceptions, Memphis was still a cotton-based economy during the 1960s, which suggests this plantation mentality was easily transferrable from the cotton fields onto the factory floors. When sanitation workers decided to protest their working conditions, what might have been an isolated incident was given national media attention when the most famous American civil rights leader, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., participated in the March 1968 march. But according to the article, it was not Dr. King’s presence that mobilized factions to participate in civil disobedience; it was the freedom sentiments that were contained in protest signs that read, “I AM A …show more content…

Martin Luther King, Jr. less than a week after joining the striking sanitation workers did not minimize the national impact of the “I AM A MAN” campaign as Laurie B. Green revealed in “Race, Labor, and Gender in 1960s Memphis: ‘I Am a Man’ and the Meaning of Freedom.” A simple sentence was transformed into a declarative statement celebrating the civil rights movement in the United States that, as the author noted, transcended time and geography. She observed that ‘being men’ meant a rejection of subservience in terms of civil rights and social identity (Green 484). The black male workers used it as a mantra to attack the racial stereotypes that persisted and the black female workers used it to reject the notions that there was a different “womanhood” defined by race (Green 484). Instead, “I AM A MAN” awoke within these women a determination and commitment to social activism that were equal to their male counterparts. Ms. Green concluded her article with the observation, “In the context of the working-class struggles in the urban South of the 1960s, we need to emphasize demands for both an altered social reality and a changed self-definition. As wage laborers who had left sharecropping and other forms of plantation labor behind when they migrated to the city, urban African American workers now engaged both these aspects of freedom within the turmoil of the mid-1960s”

Open Document