Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical theories with embryonic stem cell research
Essay on embryonic stem cell
Essay on embryonic stem cell
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical theories with embryonic stem cell research
“Through the isolation and manipulation of cells, scientists are finding ways to identify young, regenerating ones that can be used to replace damaged of dead cells in diseased organs. This therapy is similar to the process of organ transplant, only the treatment consists of the transplantation of cells rather than organs. The cells that have shown by far the most promise of supplying diseased organs with healthy cells are called stem cells.” (Chapter Preface) I. Embryonic stem cells research has challenged the moral ethics within human beings simply because the point at which one is considered a “human,” is still under debate and practically incapable to make a decision upon. a) “The vast potential of human embryonic stem cells does not come without a cost: a human embryo.” (Introduction) CM: In order for embryonic stem cells to work as they are meant to, an embryo is required and has to be killed each and every time, and the process cannot be reused or reversed. b) “For each successful cloning event there are usually hundreds of failed attempts.” (Chapter Preface) CM: Not only are there hundreds of failed attempts, but there are thousands of scientists world-wide are experiencing hundreds of failed attempts. c) “In particular, sacrificing human embryos would fundamentally depart from the long-honored Hippocratic ethic which teaches, ‘First do not harm.’” (William Cheshire) CM: This is considered Hippocratic because the first step taken in order to obtain the embryos is to kill them. This is not only harming the embryos, but it has taken it to the complete next step in which it is unacceptable. d) “Public conscience has time and again reaffirmed the Hippocratic ethic in such statements as the Nuremburg Code and the Declarat... ... middle of paper ... ...ou have not thought about it enough.” (Stem cells and the President) CM: These are the words of “James Thomson, the fore-most stem cell researcher in the United States,” and for a head person to proclaim his own profession as he did is almost mortifying. He basically admitted that the process is indeed twisted and downright awful to think about. e) “I worry about a culture that devalues life. I think my job is to encourage respect for life. On the other hand, I believe technologies and science will help solve many medical problems, and I have great hope for cures.” CM: These are the words President George W. Bush spoke to two bioethicists at the White House. His words are approaching desperate, in the fact that he indeed knows the side effects, but hopes and believes that the procedures are worth the while, and that the cells will live up to their said potential.
Bonnie Steinbock, in her paper entitled, “What Does “Respect for Embryos” mean in the Context of Stem Cell Research?” argues that using human embryos for embryonic stem cell research is immoral and illicit. She forms her argument on the “consideration of the human subject from the moment of conception” (Bioethics 592). The author supports her argument with five reasons as to why using human embryos for ES research. She explains that the moment the gametes unite, an embryo with human rights is formed. Building off of her first statement, the author explains that it is immoral and illicit to intervene in the development of an individual with rights in a non-favorable way, because
" An Overview of Stem Cell Research | The Center for Bioethics & Human Dignity."
Reich, Warren T. “The Care-Based Ethic of Nazi Medicine and the Moral Importance of What We Care About”. American Journal of Bioethics 1.1 (2001): 64-74. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17 Oct. 2013.
One of the most heated political battles in the United States in recent years has been over the morality of embryonic stem cell research. The embryonic stem cell debate has polarized the country into those who argue that such research holds promises of ending a great deal of human suffering and others who condemn such research as involving the abortion of a potential human life. If any answer to the ethical debate surrounding this particular aspect of stem cell research exists, it is a hazy one at best. The question facing many scientists and policymakers involved in embryonic stem cell research is, which is more valuable – the life of a human suffering from a potentially fatal illness or injury, or the life of human at one week of development? While many argue that embryonic stem cell research holds the potential of developing cures for a number of illnesses that affect many individuals, such research is performed at the cost of destroying a life and should therefore not be pursued.
Abstract: Religion has played a key part in the battle for embryonic rights. Pope John Paul II has spoken out against stem cell research; however, Buddhist leaders and the Episcopal Church have taken a stand for stem cell research. Different religions have different opinions about stem cell research. However the controversy can never really be solved because it is so hard to define the line of morality when talking about stem cells and embryos.
While many support embryonic stem cell research, some people oppose it say that it is an unethical practice. According to these people, embryonic stem cells require murdering a baby, human life is defined by rational beings, those capable of rational thought or a consciousness. In order to be rational one must have a consciousness, the ability to have thoughts and feel pain, to begin with. “For a fertilized egg, there is no consciousness and also no history of consciousness” (Stem). If abortions are allowed within the United States, why shouldn’t embryonic stem cell research be? Another claim against embryonic stem cell research is that it devalues human lives. “Some argue that researching embryonic stem cells will lead us into cloning technology” (Embryonic). While embryonic cloning is a possibility, we already possess the capabilities to clone so cloning is an invalid argument. The final argument against embryonic stem cell research is that there are alternatives, like adult stem cells. While adult stem cells may be utilized, they won’t be as effective. Embryonic stem cells are not only efficient but also renewable. They can be grown in a culture where as adult stem cells are extremely rare, if there are any. They can only be found in mature tissue. Isolating these extremely rare cells is challenging and has a high failure rate if not harvested correctly. “One major difference between adult and embryonic stem cells is their different abilities in the number and type of differentiated cell types they can become” (Stem). Using adult stem cells we might never understand our development from conception ...
believe embryos should be immolated, but in evaluation, it is morally wrong. Through the use of
“Stem Cells: The Future of Medicine.” Medschool.umaryland.edu. University of Maryland School of Medicine Web 14 Nov 2013
Waskey, Andrew J. “Moral Status of Embryo.” Encyclopedia of Stem Cell Research. Ed. Clive N. Svendsen, and Allison D. Ebert. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2008. 347-52. SAGE knowledge. Web. 15 Apr. 2013.
The cloning of human embryos for biomedical research has be an ethical issue ever since the opportunity presented itself. To get a better grasp of the issue, Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry was read to see what the moral issues were involved with the cloning of human embryos. The paper discusses two main points: the cloning of human embryos should be used for biomedical research and the cloning of human embryos should not be used for biomedical research. The paper has broken the section for the use of cloning embryos into two positions, so there are really three positions provided in reading. I have chosen to agree with position one in the paper.
The moral predicament lies in the way that a great part of the exploration requires the obliteration of human fetuses. Tragically, when confronted with such decisions, our standard moral schemas appear to request contradicting and unmanageable positions. The
Foht, Brendan P. "Three-Parent Embryos Illustrate Ethical Problems with Technologies." Medical Ethics, edited by Noël Merino, Greenhaven Press, 2015. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context,
Although the Nuffield Council on Bioethics and the Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) state the technique is safe some opponents may argue that the long term risks are unknown posing the question of certainty as to whether it inflicts lasting damage onto the child (Welcome trust 2012) In the case of Alana Saarinen she was one of the few people in the world born with three biological parents in a process of cytoplasmic transfer however due to later health concerns the technique was deemed unsafe and was retracted from practice (BBC, 2015). Secondly because the technique involves manipulating the germ line, it raises ethical issues over the unknown risks it could cause future generations who are therefore unable to provide consent to the procedure (Guardian, 2015). However parents who know what it is like to care for a child with this fatal disease, should be given the opportunity to make their own choice on whether they consider the benefits of the technique to outweigh and justify the unknown risks. (Guardian,
...ink that Robertson’s article will help those who are middle of the road accept it better and hope that those who strongly oppose it see his viewpoint. Hopefully a lot of good will come out of research like this and it will benefit millions of people from giving them new life to giving them extended life.
Researchers in this field are seek to know how stem cells can be used to develop into specialized cells or tissue, which aims restore lost function in damaged organs or even grow new fully functioning organs for transplant.