Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The causes and consequences of the 1917 Russian Revolution
Essay on russia revolution of 1917
The February and October revolutions of 1917, political, social issues and the economy in Russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The first twenty years of the nineteenth century for Russia was such a time in which change and inconsistency were consistent. At the turn of the century, Nicholas II was struggling to keep power as aristocracy was losing it control over Russia. As serfdom was dying due to the emancipation, the lower class was rising for more representation. And while these two conflicting movements are happening, a world war was on the brink. In V.V. Shulgin’s The Years: Memoirs of a Member of the Russian Duma, 1906-1917, Shulgin gives his readers an in-depth look at Russia before the war, during the war, and after the war. As there are many accounts of this time in Russia’s history, there are few in which the author supports the Tsar and his struggle to regain control of the country. In this case, Shulgin fits that criterion very well. Therefore, while reading his memoirs, an analysis can take place, as the reader will uncover a more in-depth look at how it was like to be a rightist politician during the first twenty years of the century.
Before World War I, Shulgin describes the process of electing deputies into the Duma, as well as the duties of its members. During the war, his leadership comes out as he becomes a soldier. With his actions after the war and on the eve of revolution, we see his true nature as a Russian, which might also be the result of Tsarist Russia’s downfall. Through his accounts, V.V. Shulgin has given us a look in Russia from 1906 to 1917. Although he was more right than left politically, through his memoirs, we can see that he had mixed views about the events that were going around him.
As Shulgin begins his memoirs with his plans for raising electors, he focuses on the clergymen, the large landowners and more impor...
... middle of paper ...
...cal power was the downfall of the Tsar, Russian autocracy, and the non-leftist political figures. Just as the Tsar left Russia, Shulgin also left the country for the increasing threat of the Bolsheviks. Through his memoirs, the Duma deputy showed his readers not only the increasing spark of revolution, but also why he didn’t agree with all of his parties’ rightist views. It was for the better of all of Russia, not just the workers and peasants, or the nobility. Perhaps that is why he cared for the soldiers in the Great Retreat, or fought for the Bolsheviks in the Duma: the same radicals that would (in due time) eliminate the parliament.
Bibliography
Mawdsley, Evan. The Russian Civil War. New York: Pegasus Books LLC, 2005.
Shulgin, V. V. 1984. The Years: Memoirs of a Member of the Russian Duma, 1906-1917. Trans. Tanya Davis. New York: Hippocrene Books, Inc.
This was, of course, only a humorous exaggeration, a case of political satire. Yet beneath the humor, there lies a very profound testament to the belief that Russia's political culture has been inherited from its czarist days and manifested throughout its subsequent development. The traditions from the pre-Revolution and pre-1921 Russia, it seems, had left its brand on the 70-years of Communist rule. The Soviet communism system was at once a foreign import from Germany and a Russian creation: "on the one hand it is international and a world phenomenon; on the other hand it is national and Russian…it was Russian history which determined its limits and shaped its character." (Berdyaev, "Origin")
Moss, W., 2014. A History of Russia Volume 2: Since 1855. 1st ed. London, England: Anthem Press London, pp.112-113.
New York, Oxford University Press. Moorehead, Alan, Ed 1958. The Russian Revolution. New York, Carroll & Graf Publishers Inc. Pipes, Richard, Ed 1995.
Russian Social Democratic workers party. Lenin eventually returned home and started working against the tsarist regime. From the beginning of the regime, the Bolsheviks relied heavy on a strong secret police known as the Cheka (“Secret Police”). The secret police became quickly known for its brutality. Since the Bolshevik seizure of power in the October revolution, Lenin had been focus on keeping his...
Figes agrees that the ‘Red Terror’ was a pivotal moment in the war, and one which showed the Bolsheviks for what they were: ‘It [the execution of the Romanovs] was a declaration of the Terror, as well a statement that from now on individuals would count for nothing in the civil war’ . To this end, specially-appointed Commissars were given the order to execute anyone who was suspected of deserting, and even families of ex-Imperial Army officers were kept hostage to ensure political reliability. This use of terror went often hand-in-hand with a clear and systematic use of ideology. In particular, the Bolsheviks initiated a program of democratic centralism for the Red Army. This principle not only gave the ordinary workers and peasants a say in the decisions making process, but it also ensured a unity of purpose and action during troubled times. This is acknowledged by A.B. Murphy, who stated that, ‘the Bolsheviks took great steps into creating a ‘self-image’, which the population could rally
The accumulation of these factors centred on Lenin's leadership helped stamp Bolshevik power across the Soviet Union. Lenin’s pragmatic leadership was the most considerable factor in helping to fortify Bolshevik power. His willingness to take power in October/November 1917 and the successes of the move, through his right-hand man, Trotsky, was critical as it helped give him unquestioned authority within the party despite members of the Central Committee i.e. Zinoviev and Kamenev suggested industrialisation needed to occur first. This highlighted Lenin’s communist ideology, which was essential to the Bolsheviks maintaining power. Following the failure of the Provisional Government, Lenin recognised that it was the Bolshevik’s priority to legitimise their government.
Misunderstandings happen in our everyday lives, but when is one misunderstanding one too many that can ultimately leave a country in ruins? The Family Romanov written by Candace Fleming is a nonfiction piece set in the time span of 1903 to 1918 filled with the experience of life in the Russian autocracy under the Romanov rule as a peasant, royal and rebel. This story tells us about the downfall of the once greatly praised Russian autocracy, Fleming takes the reader on a journey featuring the rise, but more so the downfall of their rule. After centuries of reign, the Romanov line has a final ruler, Nicholas II, decisions are made and blood is spilled. But, how far would the people of Russia go for a fair government and how oblivious is not
Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590
Onishchenko, G.S. Town Soviet Chairman, Letter to Politburo member Mikhail Kalinin. October 1933. In Siegelbaum, Lewis H., A. K. Sokolov, L. Kosheleva, and Sergeæi Zhuravlev, eds. Stalinism as a Way of Life: A Narrative in Documents. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.
Riasanovsky, Nicholas V., and Mark D. Steinberg. A History of Russia. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford, 2005. Print.
Exploring the October revolution and the establishment of communism, Richard Pipes concludes that the origin of communism can be traced back to the distant past in Russia’s history. Pipes states that Russia had entered a period of crisis after the governments of the 19th century undertook a limited attempt at capitalisation, not trying to change the underlying patrimonial structures of Russian society. (Pipes, 1964)
Fitzpatrick, Sheila, and Yuri Slezkine. "N.I. Slavnikova Et Al. "Speeches by Stakhanovites"" In the Shadow of Revolution: Life Stories of Russian Women from 1917 to the Second World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2000. 331-41. Print.
...was alone, Lenin’s leadership that enabled the Bolsheviks to seize power in November 1917. On the other hand, if we consolidate the facts we have covered in the essay we can identify key points that were capitalised on by Lenin such as the weakness of the provisional government and using his influence to motivate the Bolshevik Central Committee, we cannot deny that these were some of the more crucial factors regarding the Bolshevik seizure of power and without them a November Revolution may not have happened. A result of that would be a legitimate leadership within Russia and the Bolsheviks would then be seen as the aggressors. Concluding this we can make the decision that it was not Lenin alone who was the reason for the success of the Bolshevik coup rather an overall period of instability within the Russian leadership and the Bolsheviks offered an alternative.
Kort, Michael. "Reform, Reaction, and Revolution in Russia." Facts on File. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Oct. 2014.
Rosenberg, William G., and Young, Marilyn B. Transforming Russia and China: Revolutionary Struggle in the Twentieth Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.