Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of technology on interpersonal
Impact of technology on social interaction
The effects of technology on interpersonal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of technology on interpersonal
APPLICATION AND CURRENT RESEARCH (in relation to contemporary media)
The four contemporary articles which will be analysed, are reflective of the current research on media rituals and contemporary technologies. The research of these authors (Anderson, Bilic, Csaszi and Maj) has been focused on broadening the concept of media rituals and their applications, particularly in relation to digital and internet forms. By critically analysing the content of these authors’ essays, this will further explain the significance of media rituals to everyday life.
Siblings in Cyberspace: Carey’s Ritual Model of Communication in the Digital Age by Helen Anderson (2011)
Firstly, Helen Anderson’s essay “Siblings in Cyberspace: Carey’s Ritual Model of Communication in the Digital Age” exemplifies the notion of contemporary media rituals in relation to Youtube. By a case study of the “vlogbrothers” John and Hank Green and their videos on Youtube, Anderson relates their video series “Brotherhood 2.0” to Carey’s ritual model of communication. By contrasting Carey’s ‘transmission model’ of communication where media is seen as a transmission of signals going back and forth, the ‘ritual model’ rather focuses on concepts surrounding ‘sharing’, ‘participation’ and ‘fellowship’ (Anderson, 2011, p.93). Thus, the ritual model resembles the Youtube culture and the project of “Brotherhood 2.0”. The “vlogbrothers” in the realisation that they were spending too much time using textual forms of communication such as texting, emails and instant messaging (which in itself has become ritualised) decided to “fight technology with technology” (Anderson, 2011, p.93). Thus, the brothers decided to go without textual communication for one year and instead, only commun...
... middle of paper ...
... with, English Wikipedia." New media & society 1461 (2014): 4448.
Csigó, P., eds. "EastBound vol. 2010 issue 1: Popular Culture and Citizenship.", “Broadening the Concept of Media Rituals: Tabloids as “Low Holidays of Television” (2010).
Maj, Anna, and Michal Derda-Nowakowski. "Ecosystem of Knowledge: Strategies, Rituals and Metaphors in Networked Communication." At the Interface/Probing the Boundaries 85 (2012)
From James Carey, Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1985; repr. London/New York, Routledge, 1992
http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/irvinem/cctp748/carey-summary-comm-culture.html
Martin Irvine
cct.georgetown.edu/irvine
http://www.deliberatelyconsidered.com/2012/09/digital-events-media-rituals-in-the-digital-age/
Digital Events: Media Rituals in the Digital Age
By Lisa Lipscomb, September 3rd, 2012
Media and Popular Culture. The McGraw-Hill Reader: Issues across the Disciplines. Ed. Gilbert H. Muller. 12th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2012. 426. Print.
Rideout, Victoria and Hamel, Elizabeth. (2006). “The Media Family: Electronic Media in the Lives of
Habermas, J. (2000). The public sphere. In P. Marris & S. Thornham (Eds.), Media Studies : A reader(2nd.) (pp. 92–97). New York: New York University Press.
The world is shrinking and the networks are growing at an unprecedented rate. This is possible because of our technological advances in recent decades – especially computer and networking technologies. The Internet changed the way we connect and communicate with others; it made dissipating information as easy as clicking a button. The advent of social media coupled with the powerful mobile networks and devices have enabled us to be connected twenty four seven. But this always-on connectedness is not without its downsides, it has come to a point it’s being counterproductive. Two essays, Sherry Turkle’s “The Flight from Conversation” and Claudia Wallis’s “The Multitasking Generation” in the text “Reading Critically, Writing Well”, shed light on how these technological advancements are affecting us wholesomely - the way we communicate, the way we perceive our identities and the way we live our lives.
Up until recently television has been the most prominent medium of entertainment and information in our lives. Nothing could beat Saturday morning cartoons, the six o'clock news and zoning out from the world by the distractions of prime time sitcoms. It is all of these things and more that formed television into what was thought to be the ultimate entertainment medium, that is, up until now. Television in the twenty-first century is not the television our parents watched or in fact what we watched as children. Today’s generation are no longer satisfied with the traditional television experience. Today’s audience no longer has to follow the network’s predetermined schedule nor is television the one dimensional experience it used to be. Viewers no longer need to schedule a fixed time in order to gather information or watch their favourite show (Smith 5). They can record it with the push of the DVR (Digital Video Recording) button or watch it on a device and obtain background information via the Internet. In addition, viewers now have the opportunity to interact with, share, and produce their own material from their favourite show (5). In order to not lose the authenticity of television, media theorists have created transmedia. This new twist on television gives the user more control and more involvement than ever before. The concept has been termed as transmedia storytelling. The online journal Infoline defines transmedia storytelling in its January 2014 issue as “social, mobile, accessible and re-playable.” Originally coined in the 1990’s it was not until 2003 when Henry Jenkins, a professor of communications at the University of Southern California, wrote his article “Transmedia Storytelling” that the term began being ...
Media has long been the bullseye of negative critique and arguments targeting digital activity as passive. However, technological times surround us and it is more useful to observe how these platforms can be beneficial, than to become victims of an instrument created by and for man.
Curran, J. and Gurevitch, M. (eds.) Mass Media and Society: fourth edition. Arnold, pp. 29-43.
Hartley, John (2002), Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts, London, Routledge, pp. 19-21.
“Technology is supposed to make our lives easier, allowing us to do things more quickly and efficiently. But too often it seems to make things harder, leaving us with fifty-button remote controls, digital cameras with hundreds of mysterious features.” (James Surowiecki) Whether or not is known, technology has become too heavily relied on. It is replacing important social factors such as, life skills and communication skills. While technology is created to be beneficial, there must be a point in time where we draw the line. Once face-to-face conversations begin to extinguish, this means that there is too much focus on the “screen culture”. In her writing, “Alone Together”, Sherry Turkle talks
Campbell, Richard. Media & Culture: an introduction to mass communication. Bedford/St. Martin?s: Boston, N.Y. 2005.
Sinclair, John (2002) “Media and Communications : Theoretical Traditions”, in Stuart Cunningham and Graeme Turner (eds), The Media & Communications in Australia, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp.23-34.
The notion of culture and communication are important in understanding society and further comprehend its problems. Different theoretical paradigms of mass culture and mass media are never coequal viewing the matter antagonistically with another. Some theoretical approach regards the notion of communication positively whereas other considers it as having a negative impact on culture. Three of the most significant theoretical ideas on the subject are the liberal-democratic, Althusserian and governmental approaches in viewing mass communication and its impact on mass culture. This essay will seek to examine and differentiate the different perspectives in understanding communications and culture.
Flew explains that the internet is a network of devices that share information using a signal, which allows them to communicate with one another, and individuals use this connection to complete all sorts of tasks and services, one of which is creating and sharing content; labeled as web 2.0, social media (13), and New New Media (Levinson, 1). This form of new media has been popularized by the creation of social media websites such as Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter in the early 2000 's, but Web 2.0 is not really an invention of a new product, or merely social media, but rather a new way of utilizing new media to allow users to take control and create their own content; putting them in control of the distribution of information (Flew, 13). Previously, individuals could only be consumers, receiving whatever the large distributors deemed worthy of sharing. Now, New New Media allows anyone to share with others on the internet, creating a brand new environment that allows users to interact like never before; becoming not only consumers, but producers as well (Levinson, 2). For instance, in the film, Brandy took pictures of herself in costumes to create an alternative identity for herself on tumblr, Don 's wife used New Media to create a profile for herself on Ashley Madison, and Donna posted pictures of her daughter to private subscribers – each producing content which others then consumed. Likewise, they consumed media created by others, completing the cycle of New Media. New Media is naturally convergent, evident in the overlapping and intermingling of the individual 's stories in the film; each person 's interaction with new media affected the story of someone else in some way or another, ultimately linking nearly all of the stories into one (Men, Women, and
Media is one of the most powerful tools that a communicator can have. Media can build up empires and also tear them down. It has proven to society time and time again that its power is untamable, as well as unpredictable. It shapes who we are personally and it shapes everyone around us. In order for one to truly understand the concept of media integrated into our culture, we have to first discern what media is, the elements inside of media, and finally how media connects to us and our culture as well as how it shapes it and our responsibility in utilizing this power.
Sewel, Philip W. “From Discourse to Discord: Quality and Dramedy at the End of the Classic Network System” Television and New Media 11.4 (2010): 235-59. Web. 18 January. 2014.