Counterfeit and Note as Money in the 1800s

563 Words2 Pages

“Is this note counterfeit or not?” is a question that most shopkeepers asked themselves before they accepted a bill from a customer during the 1800s (Mihm, 2007). Throughout the 1800s “the money supply became a great confluence of more than ten thousand different kinds of paper” (Mihm, 2007, 3). The large numbers of different bank notes created a situation where shopkeepers frequently came in contact with notes that they had never seen before, making it difficult to determine whether or not a note was counterfeit—“counterfeiters exploited people’s unfamiliarity with the currency” (Mihm, 2007, 8). In attempting to determine the authenticity of a note, the shopkeeper often considered many of its different elements (Mihm, 2007). The first element of the bank note that the shopkeeper may have considered is the name of the bank that the note is affiliated with. In this case, the bank is “Continental Currency.” Once the shopkeeper had determined what bank the note is from, he could then decide if he had previously encountered a note from that bank and if he had, if this note resembled the note he had seen in the past (Mihm, 2007). The bank’s name on this note is presented in the form of a border that surrounds all four sides of the note. “Continental Currency” is written in a very intricate and detailed font. The font that is used in the note is important because the more complicated and sophisticated that it is, the harder it may be to engrave into the plate used to make counterfeit notes. Also, the name of the bank leads to other questions surrounding the integrity of the bank—is it a bank that the shopkeeper had encountered before? Does the shopkeeper have confidence in the bank? The bank’s integrity was of utmost importance because while counterfeit notes were one problem, fraudulent notes were an equally large problem (Mihm, 2007). This note would be fraudulent if the Continental Currency was “unable- or unwilling- to redeem” it (Mihm, 2007, 9). On the note the following promise is written: “This bill entitles the bearer to receive three Spanish milled dollars, or the value thereof in gold or silver, according to a resolution of Congress, passed at Philadelphia February 17, 1776. If the Continental Currency was unable to uphold this contract the note would be fraudulent and the bank would lose its credibility and honor.

More about Counterfeit and Note as Money in the 1800s

Open Document