The notion of decision-making is not really about choosing well; rather, it is about choosing the best and thereby, making the right choice (Schwartz, 2004). In addition, most decisions consist of different aspects. In Schwartz (2004), it was mentioned that the official dogma of the concept choice is that more choices lead to more freedom. Thus, when there are more choices to choose from, it would enable individuals to have more freedom and autonomy, therefore, choosing the best choice out of all possible choices (Roets, Schwartz & Guan, 2012). Although more choices allows for a “better” decision logically, in that more choices would increase the probability of a more satisfying decision, that may not be for the best. Altogether, when presented with a limited number of choices as compared to extensive choices, individuals find it easier to make a decision. Therefore, extensive choices do not necessary lead to autonomy and freedom.
In situations whereby the number of options multiplies, it positively correlates to the expectation of the object being decided upon (Schwartz, 2004). Often, the problem arises when an individual is given too many options to choose from; therefore, expectations increase as comparison sets in as the individual compares what he/she has, to what is expected of it. This added effort to compare, which is required for good decision-making, could be one of the reasons why decision-making is not managed effectively (Schwartz, 2004). For instance, when purchasing an electronic gadget, individuals will expect that the chosen choice would be the best out of all choices; further, the individual may develop the mindset of the gadget having to consist of high specifications, the latest technology and a stylish appear...
... middle of paper ...
...ng.
Individuals are often faced with plenty of options and decision-making has become a part in everyday life, where the freedom of choice has been mistakenly understood as an absolute advantage instead of a potential disadvantage. It was previously mentioned that when choices become extensive instead of being limited, individuals often have trouble settling for a single best option (Roets, Schwartz & Guan, 2012). However, an individual could overcome the problem by settling for a “good enough” option instead of seeking for the best option. This would in turn, reduce the potential for regret and disappointment with the post-decision awareness that the best option chosen is not the ‘best’ afterall. All in all, when presented with extensive choices, individuals find it hard to make a decision and ironically, too much freedom and autonomy can impede decision-making.
Decision-making would be so much easier if we all maintained our autonomy in making the decision, however, because our decisions do not always abide by autonomistic values paternalistic intervention must occur. The purpose of autonomy is to allow us to choose to do things that affect only ourselves and does not negatively affect those around us. Unfortunately, many choices do, whether we know it or not, involve those in our environment. Paternalism is in place to protect the rights that are in our best interest and that will benefit us in the long run. Paternalistic intervention occurs when decisions are no longer in our best interests. If the decision is like to be regretted and irreversible in the future, paternalism is again justified. Autonomy is a fleeting concept, for as soon as someone chooses to do something that will later cause an addiction, his or her autonomy is lost. They no longer have the decision to do or not to do the action; it becomes a need.
The proper response to an autonomy-exercising choice is one of respect, and this respect seems to counsel non-interference with the agent's choice even if we believe the consequences of interfering would be superior for the agent. Preference-evincing choices often give us reason for non-interference as well, but only because we think the consequences of doing so will be better in some respect for the agent. (Zwolinski,
his own life how he wishes, even if it will damage health or lead to
"Quotes about Decision Making, Sayings about Choices." The Quote Garden - Quotes, Sayings, Quotations, Verses. Web. 22 Mar. 2011. .
Rational choice theory, developed by Ronald Clarke and Derek Cornish in 1985, is a revival of Cesare Becca...
In conclusion, the significance of personal choice is that it can affect a person’s emotions, cause people to be autonomous, and enables people to exercise free will. Personal choice can control and shape a person’s emotions. Also, personal choice teaches independence by having people make decisions for themselves. Personal choice is a form of freedom, and makes people’s lives different than others by their choices. Personal choice is the key concept of a unique
The Paradox of Choice has multiple points that can be considered the big take aways. First, choosing is not an easy procedure in daily life. The consumer must learn to be careful and choose strategically. Second, when making decisions, one cannot expect to get maximum results. Sometimes settling for less is necessary. Finally, the decision maker must account for loss, and be prepared to experience negative results from some decisions.
The process of making a decision for many is a disconcerting responsibility. While for others, making a decision is second nature. According to Browne et al., "Decisions are streams of choices. These streams contain bits of information, events, and choices (1998, p. 50)." The authors go on to state:
Decision making theories and models largely derive from the fields of psychology and economics. The Lens Model (Brunswik, 1952) was a conceptual design, sparking a plethora of literature outlining subsequent models and theories on judgements and decision making. Brunswik set out that an individual uses fallible ‘cues’ from their environment while trying to be as empirically accurate as possible in making judgements. Hammond (1967), an architect of modern decision making theory built on this conceptual model with his Cognitive Continuum Theory (CCT), which looks at the combination of an individual’s cognitive ability and their use of situational ‘cues’ when making a decision (Hammond et al, 1967; & Hammond, 2000). CCT works on the notion that decision making is based on a certain systematic process: the analysis
The “economic approach to human behavior” is capable of explaining all human actions and behavior because it accounts for unknowns that are not necessarily explicitly explained in the approach. Any factor leading to a decision that is unexplained is still considered a change in preferences; Becker cites aging as an example. People’s preferences change as they get older, leading to different decisions. The changing of the biology in the brain can lead to preferences that change over time, such as the need for less sleep as one gets older. The e...
How much free will do we have? How free are your choices? This old problem about free will has been debated for many years, but why it is a problem to be solved, everyone knows what free will is. However, not everyone has the same idea about it. Some people might say free will is not existed and it is an illusion, but others could have an opposite view about it and say it is obviously that there is free will. It is clearly that human beings do have free will. In fact, all of our decisions were made by our own choices whether they are consciously or unconsciously. However, most people do not just live with themselves but in a society, and there are laws and rules within it. Choices and decisions might be limited because of those barrier, but
Decision-making is based on many different conditions and controlling factors that exist at the time of conflict. People take into consideration the thoughts and opinions of others, hindering the idea of an individual’s essence. If an essence really existed, another person’s thoughts would not affect someone else’s. Instead, a person makes choices from birth and the different decisions that one chooses form a pattern and creates one’s character.
t is intriguing that when a person is presented with the ideas of free will or determinism, they usually jump rather quickly to the conclusion of free will. Most people appreciate the genuine freedom that accompanies choice, but do we really possess it? Complete free will would mean that our decisions would be unrelated to other factors such as the environment or genetics. In reality, our free decisions are based on factors that are beyond our own control. When exercising certain choices, we conclude that we have acted freely and distinguish our actions from situations in which we believe were not in our control. The events that are not in our control are pre-determined for us, which lead us on a path to a determined life. Even though we may be making our own unique decisions, they all connect to form a single planned outcome.
We make choices every hour, every minute, and every second of our lives; whether big or small our choices are slowly putting us in the direction we choose or end up. Many of us do not realize what contributes to the choices we make and why it affects others the same way if affects us and because of this many authors and writers have written stories and articles about coming to terms with making a choice and how to better ourselves when it comes to decision-making for the future.
The other day I walked into the supermarket to buy a box of Kleenex. I was faced with a variety of colors, textures, box designs, and even the option of aloe. All these features designed for a product to blow my nose into! Selection wasn't limited to the Kleenex section, either…I found abundance in every aisle. We seem to always want more - more choices, more variety, more time. In fact, even the word "supermarket" implies a desire for more than just a simple market.