Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The american revolution critical analysis
The american revolution chapter 5
The rise of the American revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The american revolution critical analysis
The author delivers a compelling interpretation of the Revolutionary War with intricate details of the battles and descriptions of the individuals who were a part of this intriguing part of American history. Ferling does a great job breaking this historical event into four unique segments, which assist the reader in understanding various components of the war. The breakdowns define distinct areas of the Revolutionary War, which allows the reader to grasp small and understand parts of this historical event, enabling the reader to put these elements together with a better understanding of the Revolutionary War. Ferling, does a great job with this; his four breakouts which are “Going to War”, “The War in the North”, The War in the South” and finally “American Victory”, give a great visually to each area he has decided to break the war into. Given the length of this book, many could consider this an intimidating read; however, Ferling’s ability to keep the story moving freely keeps the book from bogging down. For me the most interesting part of the book was how Ferling described the onset of the American colonist going to war with the British. He was able to in my opinion show how America in those early days struggled and attempted to define themselves, while at the same time stand up for what they felt was right. The interesting thing about this particular book is the author did not focus on one particular character. Ferling, introduced men like, General Israel Putnam, Benedict Arnold, Henry Lee, and Henry Knox who were instrumental to the Continental Army. However, many he called attention to where individuals, who were not as prominent as men, were like George Washington, John Paul Jones or even Paul Revere, who most people... ... middle of paper ... ...n regards to the Revolutionary War. Ferling was able to cover a broad topic, yet go in enough detail to keep the reader interested. As I mentioned earlier, his research was excellent, and this came through with his pictorial examples and his writing. I have not read many books about this particular period in American History; however, I believe the author has a great compassion and insight for this particular subject. Ferling was able through his writing to explain these events in such a way, that those who read the book, will not only gain a better understanding of the Revolutionary War, but also enjoy learning as they read and excellent deliberation about the colonies and their early struggles to become and independent nation. Works Cited John Ferling, Almost a Miracle, The American Victory In the War of Independence, New York: Oxford University Press. 2007
He reviewed American Insurgents, American Patriots. In his review, Dierks saw the emotion of rage as the theme throughout the book (scholarworks.iu.edu). In the second paragraph of the review, he states, “only rage can explain the inexorable march toward war,” following this he makes a reference to another scholarly piece by T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence (2004). In that book, Dr. Breen explains the joining of the American Colonies because of the boycotts against England. Dierks sees American Insurgents, American Patriots as a follow up to Breen’s 2004 novel which, instead of focusing on the unification of the colonies, focuses on the unification of the people to rise up and fight The British Crown (scholarworks.iu.edu). Dierks does not mention how the idea of the colonies coming together because of the economic factor and the boycotts against England were discussed throughout American Insurgents, American Patriots and makes it appear as if the book solely focuses on the rage and violence of the colonists. He does point out that most scholars credit The Founding Fathers and their “genius” for the cause and success of The American Revolution (scholarworks.iu.edu). He agrees that this book gives credit for the revolution to the rural colonists and the average people, stating that their violence was more effective than political savvy of the colonial elite. He ends his review with saying Breen’s final thoughts are optimistic and pleasant saying the revolution was a “political triumph—independence first declared by force of words and then defended by force of arms”
Most reviewers rate this book between three and four out of five, with the majority of reviews being four out of five. The book does a great job of depicting the historical events that are covered, and the author does so while still maintaining the entertaining qualities of a fiction book. I would rate this book a four out of five because it is not only entertaining to read while still accurately depicting historical events, but the author does a great job of keeping the reader’s attention with the characters’ depiction. Overall, I am pleased with the book and have learned much more from it than what is covered in The American Journey.
Part of the book that caught my interest was the maps included in the chapters. It was really helpful for readers who were unfamiliar with the territory Gump was discussing. As the areas changed over time it helped me follow how they changed and which territories belonged to whom. Gump uses the different maps to show the differences of each territory without having to look at the text and allowing readers to easily access the maps.
American history is so much more interesting now than it was when I was growing up! I have just finished reading Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community, and War by Nathaniel Philbrick. First of all, I was surprised to see a book on this summers New York Times Best Seller List about a subject so long ago. I would have thought the story about the Pilgrims had been told enough times no one would bother writing another book. Philbrick has written an enlightening account of the 17th century events that shaped our country. It was a story that is well written and enjoyable to read.
Throughout the book, Gary B. Nash narrates the war in chronological order to recount the war as it happened and emphasize the events that allowed for people of different class, gender, and/or race to stand up and call for American Independence or to turn on their country and join the British forces. In short, Nash emphasizes that the revolution was a “people’s revolution” [Page XV] and as such divided each chapter with
Wood should not have focused entirely on his commonly overlooked social and economic forces. Instead, he should have combined his insight along with the insight of other traditional forces to give his book a well-rounded theory behind the American Revolution.
William Hogeland did a great job at finding hidden stories that the majority didn’t know about. I wish it was a easier read but the information was told correctly. He indeed completed his point of the book because sometimes the past is lost to us future readers and we need to know all the events our founding Americans did to give us the country we have today. Also the book show the reader where exactly the federal government started taking control and how the people tried to fight for what they thought was an unjust law.
In Joseph Plumb Martin’s account of his experiences in the Revolutionary War he offers unique insight into the perspective of a regular soldier, which differs from the views of generals and leaders such as popular characters like George Washington. Martin’s narrative is an asset to historical scholarship as a primary source that gives an in-depth look at how life in the army was for many young men during the War for Independence. He described the tremendous suffering he experienced like starvation and privation. He did not shy away from describing his criticism of the government who he believes did not adequately care for the soldiers during and after the war. While he may be biased because of his personal involvement as a soldier, he seems to relate accounts that are plausible without embellishment or self-aggrandizement. Overall, “A Narrative of A Revolutionary Soldier” is a rich source of information providing an overview of military experience during the war.
The author is graphic in his detail of the people and the places of importance during this time in history. The book is written more from a Northern point of view and so I didn’t get quite the same perspective of the Southern side but still learned more than I knew before.
This was one of the few civil war books that did not center on either Ulysses Grant or Robert Lee. It told a story about the Jayhawker and pro-South Bushwhacker guerrillas, who by the end of the civil war were just plain outlaws and would kill and rob anyone from the Union or the Confederate side. I would recommend this book to anyone who wants to know more about this part of the war. This book can be shocking at times, violent and very descriptive of what the innocent citizens had to endure.
The symbolism in the story is quite astounding, the sheer amount of information Jackson crammed into the little story is worthy of a medal in its own right. The Christian symbolism noted primarily by Martine, and the analysis of the characters and their actions by Tew both were well put together. They expanded on some areas I hit and found ones I did not even notice.
...as nice to know what the book was talking about when it mentioned places, people, and battles like Cold Harbor, the Battle of Manassas, the Wilderness, Sergeant Evans, General Grant, “Bobby Lee”, etc. I liked the way the author ended the book, the fact that both his friend, Hank, and his father died, made it more realistic. If I were in his shoes, I probably would’ve run away to the army also. It’s sad how their barn house was burned by the Confederates. He must’ve thought there to be a lot of glory in the war to have run away instead of do chores at the farm. I’m sure a lot of young men at that time wanted to be a part of the war just like Jem and Hank. I admire how Jem loved his father so much, and wanted to follow him to the war. He didn’t want to only go into the war for the glory like his friend Hank, but he believed that the slaves should be set free. His family had their share of slaves, but in the book they were treated well. The details of Jem’s daily life as a soldier are interwoven with vivid depictions of actual battles and historical figures in this taut, fast-paced story. And that’s what I like about this book. It brings alive the realities of war and its aftermath.
When one explains his or her ingenious yet, enterprising interpretation, one views the nature of history from a single standpoint: motivation. In The American Revolution: A History, Gordon Wood, the author, explains the complexities and motivations of the people who partook in the American Revolution, and he shows the significance of numerous themes, that emerge during the American Revolution, such as democracy, discontent, tyranny, and independence. Wood’s interpretation, throughout his literary work, shows that the true nature of the American Revolution leads to the development of United State’s current government: a federal republic. Wood, the author, views the treatment of the American Revolution in the early twentieth century as scholastic yet, innovative and views the American Revolution’s true nature as
...e gun, it seemed, the greater the owner‘s pride in it.” (McCullough 33) The Continental army certainly did not look like an army yet these people were brought together in this fight for freedom and prevailed even winning the support of Americans who had no hope the British would be defeated.” Merchant Erving had sided with the Loyalists primarily because he thought the rebellion would fail. But the success of Washington‘s army at Boston had changed his mind as it had for many” (McCullough 108). The reader must comprehend the power of this accomplishment for the rag-tag army. “Especially for those who had been with Washington and who knew what a close call it was at the beginning-how often circumstance, storms, contrary winds, the oddities or strengths of individual character had made the difference- the outcome seemed little short of a miracle.” (McCullough 294).
Many sections of the book were unnecessary and useless for my certain task. Most of the book was also written in a story format and was not cold hard facts. However Chapter 5 gave an in-depth description of the Boston Tea Party and also the effects it had on the colonist. It also stated what the colonies did about this and how they went about rectifying it.