Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Churchill's leadership during world war 2
Churchill's leadership during world war 2
Winston churchill influence on ww2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Churchill's leadership during world war 2
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. It’s inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery(Sir Winston Churchill).” During World War I and II, much of Europe was taken over and placed into the slavery of socialism and of Adolf Hitler. While much of Europe was sitting on their hands over the crisis of Hitler, Churchill stood strong and knocked the Nazi general back into his place. Most European governments pre-World War II held total authority over its people and exerted control over aspects of public and private life (Johnson 46, 58, 108-112) (Berdichevsky) (Zegart). Churchill fought against these odds during his career in politics as Prime Minister to England. In Churchill’s speech against the Treaty of Munich in October 1938, he explained and predicted the faults and failures of the treaty (Johnson 355). Later, after the fall of France to Germany in June 1940, he went on to persuade Britain of the possibility of their invasion (Johnson 349). Churchill, therefore, through his election and recognition of the political placement and failures to bring peace in Europe, was able to raise Europe’s survival rate against Hitler. Recognizing that most of Europe was socialist, Churchill worked to remove England from the labor party in order to run over the rise of totalitarianism. The socialist government in Germany was under the control of the Nazi party increasing angst with Hitler in control (Johnson 108-112). Through his elections as Prime Minister he was able to mend the damage done by Chamberlain in his attempt to appease Hitler (Johnson 46). Having lived through World War I, Chamberlain was determined to avert another war. His policy of appeasement towards Hitler was co... ... middle of paper ... ...reoccupies-the-rhineland>. Johnson , Paul. Heroes. 1st. New York City: Harpercollins Publishers, 2007. 299. Print. Johnson, Paul. Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties. Revised. New York City: Harper Perennial Publishers, 1991. 870. Print. Manning, Scott. "Churchill’s Earliest Warning About Hitler." Historian on the Warpath. N.p., 8 Mar 2011. Web. 14 Mar 2014. . "Socialist Parties." Infoplease. Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, n.d. Web. 21 Mar 2014. . Zegart, Alex. "Mussolini's Italy." Spotlight. Weebly. Web. 13 Mar 2014. .
Review of Frederick Lewis Allen: Since Yesterday: the 1930’s America. (New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc., 1939), 362 pp.
- Churchill, Winston, in Finest Hour, The Journal of Winston Churchill, accessed 9/7/2013 p.31 from https://www.winstonchurchill.org/images/finesthour/vol.01%20no.141.pdf
World War I was a time of great hardship and strife for all nations involved. European countries were pitted against each other in a struggle to support their allies, and Britain was thrown into the fray barely a week after the war began. Throughout the four years of war, Britain proved to be an integral part of the Central Powers’ defeat—this, however, would not have been as easy without the assistance of Winston Churchill. A writer, politician, naval officer, and amateur scientist, Winston Churchill greatly influenced the outcome of the war through his time as the head of the British navy, assistance in creating the tank, and involvement with the British government.
The Roaring Twenties was a period of intense tension towards the numerous barriers of tradition. Unlike the gradual fluctuations in modern day society which lead tension in its wake, the 1920’s was a bombardment of radical change ranging from societal norms to economic consumption. The end of World War I led to the end of idealism, and evolving values began to escalate towards the 1920’s. The surge of immigrants allowed for greater and greater economic booms, including the use of credit and involvement in the stock market. Thus, increasing racial tensions surfaced, heightening as economic booms amplified. Such a deep shift in American culture conflicted with traditional mentalities. The rising tension between new and changing attitudes was led by emerging racial tensions, economic shifts, radical religious beliefs, and the divergence of the role of women in society.
Great leaders are found on both sides of history, the good side and the bad. Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler were both good leaders, even though they were on different sides of the war. Churchill and Hitler, although very different were both effective leaders because they evaluate and understand the other side’s strengths and weaknesses and are underestimated. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the opposing side is important during war because it means that one is able to use his opponent’s weaknesses against him during war, whether it is military or political. For example, Hitler was very good at using his opponents’ weaknesses against them, and this is evident by how fast he was able to invade Europe. The magnitude of Hitler’s
Out of some of the most turbulent times in history have come the greatest ages of success and prosperity. The 1920’s and 1950’s are two eras that exemplify the spirit of triumph and wealth. In both decades, a nation thrilled by the victorious conclusion of war and the return of their loved ones from war entered into an age of capitalism and materialism, bolstering the economy and with it national pride. Some of the features most common to the 20’s and 50’s were consumerism and the accompanying optimistic mindset, the extent to which new ideas entered society, and discrimination in terms of both sexism and racism. On the heels of war, new technology caused a decrease in prices of goods in the 1920’s and in the 1950’s the GI Bill increased income.
Gilbert. M.,(1997), A history of the twentieth century: Volume one: 1900-1933, Bath Press, Great Britain.
...nland. There are mixed opinions towards this policy, and the question why historians have debated appeasement continuously over the passing decades. Many believe that Chamberlains policy of appeasement was fuled by a desire to do everything in his power possible to avoid war, and his belief that all European powers shared the dame feeling. The catastrophic events of World War one set in a deep fear and hatred of war among many. It is also felt that Chamberlain followed the policy of appeasement as a means to buy some time as he realised that British defences were hopelessly inadequate, as British military strength had been greatly reduced due to the commitment of disarmament. Even at the time of the Anschluss Britain was declared unprepared for war. Therefore to conclude, whatever the reasons for the continual policy of appeasement, it can be said that appeasement with the sole aim of preventing war did not succeed, however what it was seen to do was prolong the inevitable. Many strongly feel that the continual demands of Hitler were flared by the lack of opposition, and his continual greed for expansion, his demands were rarely attacked, simply given into with little hesitancy.
He got mistaken at first, but he has always been an intelligent man who could observe and analyze the political globe as a whole. Churchill was a very well known democratic leader. He consulted with subordinates on proposed actions and encouraged participation from them. Churchill had a tough tendency to influence the British Parliament along with other countries’ political affairs. He was a member of the Conservative and the Liberal party in Great Britain. He acted as a war reporter for several London newspapers and also wrote his own books about the campaigns. He was a very rebellion, independent and courageous man. He attracted the whole public, not only in UK but the whole world respected him as a great leader. He got elected Prime Minister twice: from 1940 to 1945 and from 1951 to 1955 as a democratic
During the years between 1920 and 1960, America saw change in many aspects of life. The United States was a part of two major wars and a crash of the banking system that crippled the economy greater than ever seen in this country’s history. Also the country had new insecurities to tackle such as immigration and poor treatment of workers. These events led to the change of America lives socially, economically, and politically. The people of America changed their ideas of what the country’s place in the world should be. The issues challenging America led the country to change from isolation to war, depression to prosperity, and social change. The threats to American way of life, foreign and domestic, were the changing forces to the country in the twenties to the sixties.
Winston Churchill presents a speech during the Nazi era. He attempts to persuade the audience that the United States and Britain must put effort to resist the Nazi Germany military force. In order to effectively convince the readers, he uses several techniques, including rhetorical questions, repetition, and direct expressions. Throughout his assertion, the author encourages the readers into the context, and allures them with precise information about the Dark Ages due to the Nazis. Thus, Churchill depicts a logic and persuasive argument.
Wukovits, John F., ed. America's Decades: The 1920's. San Diego: Greehaven Press Inc., 2000. Print.
In 1904, Churchill left the Conservative party and joined the Liberal party, and then switched back in 1925. Under other circumstances, he could have had trouble gaining back the support that he lost when he “party-ratted” (the Churchill Project), but when he was first elected in 1940, the country was in a state of crisis, and Churchill was well-prepared. Since the early-to-mid 1930’s, Churchill had his doubts about Adolf Hitler and Germany, partially due to his overall hatred of fascism or any sort of totalitarian government. This is shown in the book “Winston Churchill’s last campaign,” by John W. Young in the preface, where Young explains Churchill’s views and policies on different types of government as well as his thoughts on the League of Nations on page 7: “In Churchill’s opinion a totalitarian menace, whether it be Bolshevism or Nazism, would never respect international law or public opinion but only strength; unless the liberal states banded together and rearmed they would be forced to make concessions to aggressors and, ultimately, would have to fight from a weakened position” (Young, 7). This displays the early distrust that Churchill had in the idea of fascism and his foresight into the future Nazi takeover of Europe. This also shows his dedication to the security of his nation and how and after the election, all of his efforts were focused on stopping the
Since most people deemed Hitler’s excuse for violating the Treaty of Versailles justifiable, and because of Britain and France’s policy of appeasement for peace, Hitler and his military forces took full advantage of the situation and kept conquering land, especially after the Munich Conference in 1938. At the Munich Conference, Britain and France gave Germany ful...
Johnson, Paul. Modern Times, The World from the Twenties to the Eighties. New York: Harper Colophon Books, Harper and Row Publishers, 1983.