Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tactics and strategies of the vietnam war
Vietnam strategies essay
Vietnam strategies essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tactics and strategies of the vietnam war
War is the highest, most comprehensive test of a nation and its social system. War is a contest that not only tests the skill and strategy of two adversaries, but also their strength and will. Victory goes to the side which has the correct military strategy, which makes best use of the art of military science and which most successfully limits the war-making capacity of the adversary. (as cited in Pike, 1986) Through the use of the dau tranh strategy, the North Vietnamese effectively leveraged all aspects of civil, political and military resources in order to defeat a militarily and economically superior force. By skillfully, conducting the various aspects of political dau tranh and armed dau tranh the North achieved their primary political goal of the reunification of the Vietnamese peninsula under the auspices of the Lao Dong Party. The dau tranh strategy is based off the emphasis that in order to accomplish stated political objects, all efforts must be coordinated there by creating a single …show more content…
The political aspect is much broader than Americans would likely conceptually envision. The political realm of dau tranh essentially encompasses all aspects of civil society to ensure full integration with everyday life. Additionally, the effects on enemy moral and the enemy civilian population become a strategic center of gravity that can at times be more important to control than winning battles against enemy combatant forces. Author Douglas Pike, who is view as the quintessential expert of the Vietnam War, noted in one of his books just how important political dau tranh was to the North Vietnamese. Within this text he discusses how post-war analysis has showed that during the time frame of 1965 to 1973, the Americans did not lose a single important battle but still lost the war due to the effectiveness of their political dau tranh initiatives. (1986,
When Vietnamese revolutionary Ho Chi Minh and his political organization, the Vietminh, seized control of their independence from France United States Politicians saw it as another communist take over. When really Ho was more a nationalist than a communist. All Minh wanted was for the United States to recognize its independence from France and to send aid to help it reach its nationalistic goals. "Before the Cold War Ho and the Vietmin...
The Vietnam War: A Concise International History is a strong book that portrays a vivid picture of both sides of the war. By getting access to new information and using valid sources, Lawrence’s study deserves credibility. After reading this book, a new light and understanding of the Vietnam war exists.
E-History (2012, N.d.). Retrieved March 25, 2012, from http://ehistory.osu.edu/vietnam/essays/battlecommand/index.cfm.
Tim O’Brien’s book, The Things They Carried, portrays stories of the Vietnam War. Though not one hundred percent accurate, the stories portray important historical events. The Things They Carried recovers Vietnam War history and portrays situations the American soldiers faced. The United States government represents a political power effect during the Vietnam War. The U. S. enters the war to prevent a communist takeover of South Vietnam. The U.S. government felt if communism spreads to South Vietnam, then it will spread elsewhere. Many Americans disapproved of their country’s involvement. Men traveled across the border to avoid the draft. The powerful United States government made the decision to enter the war, despite many Americans’ opposition. O’Brien’s The Things They Carried applies New Historicism elements, including Vietnam history recovery and the political power of the United States that affected history.
The book, Cold War Mandarin Ngo Dinh Diem and the Origins of America’s War in Vietnam 1950-1963, by Seth Jacobs is a comprehensive retelling of the rise and fall of Ngo Dinh Diem’s government in South Vietnam. In that retelling Jacob focuses on the major events that took place in Vietnam as well as showed how America backed a leader that did nothing to booster his nation and led America into one of the worst wars in its history. The Diem regime was a corrupt and tyrannical government that used the United States’ fears of communism to push its own goals that ultimately led to its own demise. Jacob viewed the escalation of America’s involvement in Vietnam as the following, “The nine-year “experiment” that ended when Diem died was America’s crossover point from advice and support to active cobelligerency in a Vietnamese civil war” (8).
Vietnam was really just a pawn in the much larger game of the Cold War. The main political objective behind the Unites States’ involvement in the Vietnam War was to set forth it’s policy of containment prevent the “Domino E...
The Vietnam War was one of the most prolonged wars in US history. Although there were no exact dates, it is believed that US involvement lasted for around 20 years. The US went into this war hoping they could stop the spread of communism and defeat the northern Vietnamese. The battles were like nothing they had seen before and it was very difficult for the soldiers to differentiate between the enemies and civilians. To make it even more difficult for the soldiers, their “information was based on faulty intelligence”. Võ Nguyên Giáp, a northern Vietnamese general, believed that the US and the southern Vietnamese had an unstable relationship. He hoped that through the Tet Offensive the US would believe they were no longer worth defending. Fighting was done using guerrilla warfare which blurred the lines of legitimate and illegitimate killings and this had effect of bringing peoples morales down. Support for the war had always been split but this battle caused even the government to reconsider their involvement. The Tet offensive changed the US's attitude towards the Vietnam war by leading to further anti-war protests, a credibility gap in America, and for President Johnson to negotiate peace and not seek reelection.
...edge that an attack was coming, but if we had more intelligence in the North, then we might have been better prepared. The offensive seemed to indicate to most observers that the three years of “big-unit war” that followed to deployment of U.S forces in 1965 had produced only a steady stream of casualties on all sides. (Wirtz, 1991) Some of the lessons learned from the Tet Offensive include: “If the enemy has quantity and quality, do not attack”, “superior firepower almost always trumps ideological commitment”, “Guerrillas rarely win set-piece battles against well-armed regulars with access to unlimited stock of ammunition” and “don’t assume civilians will embrace a revolution forced on them at gunpoint.” (Dudley, 2001) The Tet Offensive quelled the crusading spirit that characterized America’s postwar rush to intervene in conflicts in the Third World. (Wirtz, 1991)
Lawrence, Mark Atwood. The Vietnam War: A Concise International History. N.p.: Oxford University Press, n.d. Print.
After Vietnam erupted into civil war, both sides started employing clever tactics and new t...
Most historians view the nature of the Vietnam War as rooted in the history of the French colonies in Vietnam and the growing ethnic, political, and economical division between Catholic and Buddhist Vietnamese. (Brigham, Robert, Hoffman, Kenneth)
The relationship between conventional and guerilla operations was a key element of the Vietnamese communists’ “Dau Tranh” strategy to fight and win the Vietnam War. A brief description of the Dua Tranh (meaning struggle) strategy is appropriate since it was the basis for North Vietnam’s success. The strategy consisted of an armed struggle and a political struggle. The armed struggle began with Stage One hit and run guerilla tactics to “decimate the enemy piecemeal and weaken then eliminate the government’s administrative control of the countryside...
Sozi Hassan Taha October 14, 2016 War Throughout the history of humanity, we can notice that there were many wars that happened over territories, or between countries; for example, World War One and World War Two which were the two deadliest and worst wars in the history. Basically, war occurs because of power, natural resources, and wealth; it is a fact that human in general wants to gain more and have more power. After reading all the sources that are provided I realized that even though the most important aspects of war are strategies, there will be expense of war and human losses. An example of a good battle's strategy is the Sun Pin's plan to kill Pang Chuan, and will explain the strategies that would be used in order to have
The Vietnam War started off as a nationalist struggle before turning into a class struggle as foreign powers became involved in the war. However, it is the view of many Vietnamese scholars that see the conflict as mainly a nationalist struggle for national independence and reunification (Marr). Although the role of exogenous factors is acknowledged, it is, according to this view, the force of Vietnamese nationalism and patriotism that motivated and encouraged th...
The U.S. attempted to apply conventional warfare strategy to the communist insurgency in South Vietnam. The result of this strategy was that U.S. forces were victorious in almost every military battle, but could not translate tactical achievement into operational and strategic success. However, during the course of the war, the U.S. discovered three elements of strategy that, if melded into a cohesive whole, could have achieved American objectives for a reasonable cost. First, the U.S. should have fully resourced and implemented a counterinsurgency strategy of pacification, as the primary U.S. military effort in Vietnam. Second, a robust network of South Vietnamese paramilitary forces, integrated with U.S. pacification, would have been the vital link to winning South Vietnamese popular support. Third, the synchronization of pacification with air mobility and air power operations would have effectively incorporated U.S. conventional firepower with the counterinsurgency effort. Next, the claim that U.S. military forces could not have been organized or resourced to implement an effective counterinsurgency will be refuted. Finally, a bridge forward explores whether the U.S. learned from Vietnam how to identify and fight a complex insurgency.