Zero Tolerance Policy Argument

359 Words1 Page

Zero-tolerance policies argument
I personally do not believe that the zero-tolerance policy is a good thing because it limits the students abilities to defend themselves. The wellbeing of the students is and should always be the most important factor for public schools. Schools have had a difficult time trying to balance the best interest of the whole school body. When this policy was put into place they had good intentions. But soon problems were caused. Where they supposed to punish the kids just defending themselves from bullies? Or only punish the one who started it and make it seem like they are taking sides. For example in Delaware a 6 year old boy took a camping utensil which can be used as a knife, fork and spoon to school. Naturally

Show More
Related

  • Elementary School Case Study: Frugis V. Bracigliano

    1190 Words  | 3 Pages

    This decision makes it clear the most important thing for a school to do is to protect the students. It also states that the board of education, whose role is to oversee the schools, must make sure that the staff of the schools is protecting those children. This case highlights that long-term abuse can happen in schools if there are not clear policies or, if there are, that there is no one ensuring that those policies are

    Read More

  • The School To Prison Pipeline

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    These kids don’t misbehave in the classroom for no reason. They are probably releasing those emotions that are bottled up from them at home in school. Not coming from a stable background can have quite the effect on trying to learn in a classroom. The problems that need to be fixed are trying to make schools feel more like a “safe haven” rather than a prison. Afterschool programs need to be put into place, to allow kids to stay at school for long so they don’t get involved in street life, or so they can just not have to deal with the outside problems of the world for a little bit longer. Also, school need to change. They need to try and make learning more fun, and more integrated with the children they are teaching. An easy an example of this is teaching these kids about their history, so they have many people to look up to besides just Martin Luther King Jr. or Rosa Parks. Only teaching black and Latino kids about people that don’t even look like them or go through anything they have gone through, makes them bored and uneager to learn. Also, more rewards in to be into place to make kids feel more welcomed and wanting to do good in class. Even though it may seem out of the ordinary for some, suspension needs to stop. Allowing these kids to take a break from somewhere they already don’t want to be is ushering them towards a life of hating school. Suspension not only hurt the school district but also hurt the

    Read More

  • Let's Really Reform Our Schools Summary

    484 Words  | 1 Pages

    Firstly, if there are no more troublemakers in the school, the students that want to learn will be able to learn without any distractions; also, there would be no one to bully them, and there would be no interference in their ability to learn. If we permanently ban such students from school, educators could focus more on the students who want to learn instead of focusing on troublemakers. Secondly, the students that doesn`t want to be in schools wouldn’t be wasting their time anymore. Troublemakers do not learn anything by attending the school because they have no interest in studies, and all they are doing is wasting their time. They could use this time for doing something that they want to do, or something that they are interested in. Lastly, their absence will provide a safer school environment. Troublemakers always try to get into fights against others; in fact, they have no fear of security. By their actions, they could put other students into big troubles. Their mind is always seeking for attention, and they could do anything to attain others` attention; as a result, the environment of the school gets disturbed. By not letting them into the school, we could provide a safer environment for the students that really wants to learn. Overall, banning troublemakers would be helpful for students that are serious about their

    Read More

  • Racial Inequality in the School-to-Prison Pipeline

    1233 Words  | 3 Pages

    A new policy is needed and most certainly should start out with holding schools to handle their own discipline situations, rather than relying on school security and police (Wilson, 2014). School administrators must be able to differentiate between what is a true discipline situation and when a student simply made a mistake. The rate of school suspensions have skyrocketed over the last thirty years from 1.7 million nationwide to 3.1 million and growing today (ACLU, n.d.). Each school needs to create policies of when to get school security involved and what the school’s security job involves. Unless there is a true threat to the safety of the school and/or its student’s law enforcement should never be called (Wison, 2014). The instinct to dial 911 at every infraction has to stop. Furthermore the schools must develop a gender and racial fairness; black children should not be receiving harsher punishments for similar infractions of white students (Wilson,

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of School To Prison Pipeline

    2270 Words  | 5 Pages

    The intent of this argumentative research paper, is to take a close look at school systems disciplinary policies and the effect they have on students. While most school systems in the nation have adopted the zero tolerance policies, there are major concerns that specific students could be targeted, and introduced into the criminal justice system based on these disciplinary policies. This research paper is intended to focus on the reform of zero tolerance policies, and minimizing the school to prison pipeline.

    Read More

  • “Let Teenagers Try Adulthood”

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is a serious waste of tax funds and waste extremely precious time which can never be regained. Unless parents teachers and the country start seeing these problems with shootings and gangs. in high school are all due to the fact that the most basic concept every teen knows about “everyone for their selves, if you can’t play with the big dogs than get off the porch.” With that stated, we seriously need to change the school system for.

    Read More

  • Zero Tolerance

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    Looking back on my own educational experience the words, “zero tolerance” vaguely strike a chord. If I am not mistaken I believe that our district adopted the zero tolerance policy between my junior and senior year (96/97-97/98 respectfully) as a means to hinder bullying/violence among the students. As I consider my years in high school I do not recall violence being a normal occurrence, with the exception of your random argument turned, “meet me at short stop,” dispute, nor do I remember drugs being a large concern among parents and/or school personnel. Perhaps I was naïve or maybe it turns out that it just wasn’t something to be considered a problem. There is an exception to every rule; however, I trust that during my high school career violence and drug abuse and its distribution was not the norm…

    Read More

  • The Zero Tolerance Policy: Justified or Unreasonable?

    2053 Words  | 5 Pages

    Lawmakers and school officials have been wearisome in the efforts of finding a policy that works to make our schools a safer place for students and administrators. Schools, both public and private, are an environment for learning and pleasant experiences that a child or adolescent will remember for the rest of their lives. Although, experiences like the Columbine High school massacres are not what an individual would want to remember and is one of the most significant enforcer when it comes to all austere policies. Zero tolerance was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan’s

    Read More

  • Zero Tolerance Policies in American Schools

    864 Words  | 2 Pages

    In all grades of education, from kindergarten to college, there is a form of discipline known as a zero tolerance policy. While the exact wording is different from school to school, basically a zero tolerance policy means that a student is immediately suspended, asked to attend an alternative school, or expelled if they are suspected or caught doing certain things. These policies are in place to hopefully deter students from doing drugs or being violent, but the ethics behind them are questionable. Some research has shown that these policies may not even work, and other forms of discipline would be better suited to help students. The three main activities that result in the zero tolerance policy are being caught with drugs or alcohol, being caught with a weapon, and bullying.

    Read More

  • the school to prison pipeline

    1989 Words  | 4 Pages

    Another major reason why juveniles are ending up in the juvenile justice system is because many schools have incorporate the zero tolerance policy and other extreme school disciplinary rules. In response to violent incidents in schools, such as the Columbine High School massacre, school disciplinary policies have become increasingly grave. These policies have been enacted at the school, district and state levels with the hopes of ensuring the safety of students and educators. These policies all rely on the zero tolerance policy. While it is understandable that protecting children and teachers is a priority, it is not clear that these strict policies are succeeding in improving the safety in schools.

    Read More

  • The School For Prison Pipeline

    2074 Words  | 5 Pages

    Schools inevitably must deal with disciplinary action when it comes to misconduct in students. However, at what point should the courts and law enforcement intervene? “Zero tolerance” policies started as a trend in the school setting during the 1990s in “response to the widespread perception that juvenile violence was increasing and school officials needed to take desperate measures to address the problem” (Aull 2012:182-183). However, national statistics indicated a decrease in juvenile’s share of crime during the influx of zero tolerance policies in schools (National Crime Justice Reference Service 2005).

    Read More

  • First Amendment Rights In School Essay

    1139 Words  | 3 Pages

    Students’ rights in schools are limited or just taken away. Kids are forced to do whatever the officials at their school, either the principal or the teachers, tell the students to do. One of the main right that gets taken away or limited is students’ first amendment rights, which is the freedom of expression. Students can gets suspended by just doing things the staff at the school does not like, including saying things that they don 't like or supporting a religion that the school does not support. Also, if something is said about the school or the people attending the school is said on social media that student can also get in a lot of trouble. Students should be able to have more first amendment

    Read More

  • Child Safeguarding Policy

    829 Words  | 2 Pages

    This then becomes an incident of poor practise. Having this policy ensures that all children are safe and if the policy is not followed that there will be consequences. Teachers may be aware of the policy but may not have been brought through it and therefore are unclear of how the policy works. This means that they will be unaware of how to deal with a situation or who to report to if they feel that there may be a problem with a child. Teachers and parents may be unaware or the signs and symptoms of different types of abuse and may over look it.

    Read More

  • Are Schools Doing Enough To Prevent Bullying?

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    I completely believe schools should be the one intervening in the problem not the parents. Parents aren’t with their children during school hours so for they aren’t responsible if there child is getting bullied because from personal experience I would know the parents wo...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Suspending Students

    742 Words  | 2 Pages

    When you take a child out of school it doesn’t just take away their opportunity to see their friends or make bad decisions in school again, it takes away their education. Now if schools were to start using In School Suspension, where the children still have to go to school and do work but are separated from everyone else, that is usually a worse punishment than not having to go to school for a few days. The fact of the matter is that most of the people who get suspended are people who don’t care and have parents who don’t care if they get suspended or not. They would rather get suspended than still have to stay in school and do work. Yes, sometimes it is necessary to suspend a child or punish them in a harsher way, but still there is no reason to take a child away from their education because of a bad mistake or decision they made. This means that suspending children all the time is not

    Read More

More about Zero Tolerance Policy Argument

Open Document