Who Is Andrew Jackson A Tyrant

624 Words2 Pages

Andrew Jackson, a successful general who led an entire political movement, was the voice of the common man, and had a big impact on American history. Although former President Andrew Jackson may have had popular vote, his aspirations as the common man in the beginning changed as it became undoubtedly noticeable that his power and eagerness to influence led his presidency to change directly into a tyranny. Andrew Jackson revolutionized the presidency through his actions, decisions and attitude towards the people within the United States while in office. These tyrannical actions and decisions were witnessed majorly by the removal of Indians. Overall, Jackson’s presidential legacy is the most complicated in American history because without question …show more content…

Throughout his term, this definition tyrant directly exemplifies the actions of Andrew Jackson throughout his presidency. In the early 1800’s Jackson purchased a large amount of land, he then hired many slaves to help clear it and turn it into an enormous plantation. Moreover, while Jackson was president, he possessed more than 150 slaves. This alone takes away Jackson’s status as a common man, he had more in common with Virginian royalty than with any backwoods …show more content…

(Jackson’s Message to Congress). Evidently, this supports the argument as to why Jackson was viewed a king opposed to a president. In reference to Jackson message to Congress, he explained that Native Americans would lead the country into debt. Jackson envisioned that white farmers were more essential to the economy because they are self- reliant and they simply deserved the land more than the Native Americans did. Both the Cherokee Phoenix newspaper and their Constitution served as a voice for all issues faced. In fact, the Indians had their own nation. However, as a corrupt king, Jackson did not allow personal feelings to get into the way of economic prosperity. According to his message, he claims he did not want the Native Americans to suffer, if anything he wanted to protect them from the hungry whites. He is contradicting himself simply because he failed to recognize that his main goal was money not sympathy which does not make him less than what he is, a self-obsessed and vengeful tyrant. Furthermore, even though the Cherokee nation won the case Worcester v. Georgia. Jackson did not care, he overruled and pursued to threaten the Native Americans. Even the Secretary of War Lewis Cass advocated for Jackson, as he stated in basic terms, if the Indians do not relocate from white settlements, they

Open Document