Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Good and evil in literature
Good and evil in literature
Good and evil in literature throughout history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Good and evil in literature
What exactly is evil? Is it a tangible object or just an unperceivable idea? There are many theories to these two simple questions anywhere from a physical evil presence to one’s personal concept of what is evil to them. In literature, evil can take many different forms, including physical evil, inner evil, and a combination of the two. No matter what mode it takes though, the presence of evil in literature has always been influential in the plot and always has the same ending: death.
One of the most distinct and obvious forms of evil in literature is physical evil and this takes the forms of many things from the Grim Reaper to monsters. The latter of the two is what we see in the Anglo-Saxon heroic story, Beowulf. In this story we see not just one physical evil, but three: Grendel, Grendel’s mother, and the dragon. All of these creatures were described in their own terms, yet all of their nicknames show that they are pure evil. First we have Grendel who was named the “fiend out of hell” (Heaney 9) and also the “corpse maker” (Heaney 21). While Grendel’s mother was called the “monstrous hell-bride” (Heaney 89) and the dragon was called the “nightmarish destroyer” (Heaney 191). These few nicknames barely scratch the surface of describing how truly evil each of these creatures was, yet even though they were pure evil they were still important to the story. Without these evil creatures Beowulf would not be the hero that we know him to be because he would not have anyone to defeat in battle. It is also because of these different physical evils that we get to the end goal of all evil: death. In this case of Beowulf it comes with the death of all the monsters at the hands of Beowulf in various ways, including ripping off Grendel’s arm...
... middle of paper ...
...Throughout the literary eras we can see stories containing anything evil from monsters to murderers to even ordinary men. However, no matter what type of evil these stories contain whether it is physical like the monsters in Beowulf, internal like the men in the Pardoner’s Tale or a combination of both like the witches and ambition in Macbeth, it is still greatly influential in the plot of the story and can only lead to the one end result of evil: death.
Works Cited
Chaucer, Geoffrey. "The Pardoner's Tale." Chaucer's Works. Ed. Walter W. Skeat. Vol. 4. London: U of Oxford, 2007. N. pag. Web. 24 Apr. 2014
Heaney, Seamus. Beowulf. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1999. Print.
"Macbeth: Entire Play." Macbeth: Entire Play. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
Shmoop Editorial Team. "Macbeth Themes." Shmoop.com. Shmoop University, Inc., 11 Nov. 2008. Web. 18 Apr. 2014.
The word evil is defined as profoundly immoral and malevolent. The immoral or unethical things we sometimes find ourselves doing are a result of desperation, confusion and anger. Once we realize what our actions have become, we either feel relieved or guilty, afraid of the possible outcome. Our first instincts are to try and cover up our immoral actions with actions that in our minds will fix the problem; more immoral thoughts and actions. Honesty and truth seem so distant in these situations as our desperation and fear of judgment direct our irrational choices. In Macbeth, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth experience the guilt of their role in the King’s death. As a result, Macbeth does not admit to his crime for fear of his life being taken, but instead plots against Banquo to cover his tracks. Though murder is an extreme case, the same thoughts and morals apply in the situations we face everyday. A lie, in fear of the consequences, can cause more pain and guilt than we intended thus another lie is created which adds strength to the first lie. Evil is a strong word, when heard it creates...
Unlike the former two “monsters” in Beowulf, the dragon is not characterized among cold, dark imagery. Rather, Beowulf (representing the “good”) must venture to the “flaming depths” to fight the dragon in its own territory (2549). Instead of a dark, wintry description, the dragon is surrounded by hot, light imagery in respect to the fire it breathes. Although this is the nature of the beast (literally), the Beowulf-poet’s choice of a dragon as the third monster is critical in making a statement about “good” in respect to “evil.” In a way, the speaker is bringing Beowulf and the dragon to an equal level; he even regards the two in battle as “each antagonist” rather than one protagonist and one antagonist (2565). In this manner, the line between “good” and “evil” is obscured even
While the classic battle between good and evil forces is a major theme of the medieval epic Beowulf, one may question whether these good and evil forces are as black and white as they appear. Scholars such as Herbert G. Wright claim that “the dragon, like the giant Grendel, is an enemy of mankind, and the audience of Beowulf can have entertained no sympathy for either the one or the other” (Wright, 4). However, other scholars such as Andy Orchard disagree with this claim, and believe that there is “something deeply human about the ‘monsters’” (Orchard, 29). While Grendel, Grendel’s mother, and the dragon are indeed portrayed as evil and violent foes, there are parts within Beowulf that can also lead a reader to believe that the “monsters” may not be so monstrous after all. In fact, the author of Beowulf represents the “monsters” within the poem with a degree of moral ambivalence. This ambivalence ultimately evokes traces of sympathy in the reader for the plight of these “monster” figures, and blurs the fine line between good and evil within the poem.
Everyone remembers the nasty villains that terrorize the happy people in fairy tales. Indeed, many of these fairy tales are defined by their clearly defined good and bad archetypes, using clichéd physical stereotypes. What is noteworthy is that these fairy tales are predominately either old themselves or based on stories of antiquity. Modern stories and epics do not offer these clear definitions; they force the reader to continually redefine the definitions of morality to the hero that is not fully good and the villain that is not so despicable. From Dante’s Inferno, through the winding mental visions in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, spiraling through the labyrinth in Kafka’s The Trial, and culminating in Joyce’s abstract realization of morality in “The Dead,” authors grapple with this development. In the literary progression to the modern world, the increasing abstraction of evil from its classic archetype to a foreign, supernatural entity without bounds or cure is strongly suggestive of the pugnacious assault on individualism in the face of literature’s dualistic, thematically oligopolistic heritage.
The Pardoner is the best representation of an allegorical character in “The Prologue” of Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. The Pardoner is the perfect personification of fraudulence. He shows this in three basic ways: his appearance, speech, and actions. If one just glances through the reading of the Pardoner than one will think that he is a good religious man, but if one look further into it than he will find the small double meanings that he is the exact opposite. Chaucer likes to use an allegorical style to add some comedy and sophistication to his writings.
Wills, Gary. "The Historical Context of Macbeth." Readings on Macbeth. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1999. 30-37.
“Plot Summary: Macbeth”. Shakespeare. Online Detroit: Gale, 2003. Student Resource Center- Gold. Gale. Ozen High School. 12 Jan 2010. http://find.galegroup.com
Moral evil was an issue that weighed heavily on the minds of the people of the Medieval period. Philosophers and poets alike attempted to address and understand the problem of moral evil, scrutinizing the roots of evil and the effects of evil on the body and, more importantly, on the soul. Of the philosophers that the period produced the views of St. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, and Boethius on the problem of evil are perhaps the most notable. From the literary side of the spectrum, the problem of evil is addressed heavily in Beowulf.
In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the repercussions of Macbeth murdering his King are very numerous. Through themes that include, imagery, soliloquies, atmosphere, and supernatural beings, Shakespeare enforces the magnitude of Macbeth’s crime. Most of these factors are linked together.
Chaucer, Geoffrey. “The Knight’s Tale.” The Canterbury Tales. Trans. R.M. Lumiansky. NY. Bantam, 2006. 19-63.Print
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Pardoner's Prologue and Tale. In The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. M.H. Abrams et al. 6th ed. 1 vol. New York: Norton. 1:164-178.
Grendel, a grotesque and malicious creature from the epic poem Beowulf, is the epitome of a classic monster. Although there is no full description of Grendel, he is described by the Beowulf poet as “The unholy creature / grim and ravenous” (120-121). He is generally depicted as unpleasant to gaze upon. When his arm is torn from his body and displayed above the great mead-house entrance, it is referred to as a “claw” (836). Throughout the story he is said to tear men to pieces and devour them entirely. He appears to have no true motive in his actions apart from absolute loathing, as shown when the Beowulf poet writes, “he wanted no peace / with any man of the Danish army, / nor ceased his deadly hatred, nor settled
113 Macbeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1990. The. Coursen, H. R. Macbeth: A Guide to the Play. London: Greenwood Press, 1997.
In the ancient Anglo-Saxon epic, Beowulf, the monster Grendel exhibits villainy through his killing of innocent people and through his birth, from the killing of Abel. Grendel displays villainy when he kills thirty innocent Danes in Herot’s Hall. The narrator says that Grendel “Snatched up thirty men, smashed them. Unknowing in their beds and ran out with their bodies, the blood dripping behind him, back to his lair, delighted with his night’s slaughter.” (Beowulf 37-40). Grendel not only killed thirty innocent men, but afterwards took their bodies and headed back to his lair delighted. The men were not able to defend themselves due to Grendel’s armor being impenetrable by the Dane’s swords. Therefore, showing delight after killing thirty defenseless
Macbeth demonstrates the theme of light and darkness many times throughout the book, with relations to contemporary society through innocence and evil and good and bad. It also displays the theme of ambition prevalently throughout the book and shows the complexity and distance that people are willing to go to get what they want or what others have. Appearance and reality is also a prominent theme throughout Macbeth with relationships between how people and events are not what they seem. All of these themes are extremely relevant to contemporary society today.