Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Evidence of American expansionism in the late nineteenth century
Empire comparison usa vs rome
Evidence of American expansionism in the late nineteenth century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Picture an influential government overflowing with appealing morals, vast acquired land, and a strong military. Does the Roman Empire or perhaps the United States come to mind? This, in fact, describes both civilizations. The striking parallels between the United States and Rome are alarming; particularly the underlying motives of war, the treatment of soldiers post war, and the materialistic values of both societies. With that being said, it is questioned if the United States is on a path towards self-destruction much like the collapse of the Roman Empire around 500 C.E. Although the United States is not categorized as an empire, there is evidence that has shown it has imperialized external countries. Informally, the United States is an empire which attempts to control and revolutionize other countries due to selfish motivations. The United States fully believed in the idea of manifest destiny, where American settlers thought they were destined to expand what land they owned, and perhaps that same belief still holds true. By 1890, there was not any more land to possess and as a result, the United States began waging the Spanish-American War in 1898 to obtain more territory. The battles' intentions seem to reflect those which involved the Roman Empire "which spread its laws, its culture, and its peace" in hopes of becoming powerful among the world (Reilly 189). Just like the United States today, the Roman Empire imperialized countries and lands to accommodate the needs of the empire. Even now, the United States maintains countless military bases around the world to ensure and exercise global authority. Although the Roman Empire grew, it was never satisfied with what it obtained, just as the United States does today (2-13 Bacevich). Presently, the United States places a high value on its military power and often boasts of its strength in the news. Not only does
Throughout the course of history, nations have invested time and manpower into the colonizing and modernizing of more rural governments. Imperialism has spread across the globe, from the British East India Company to France’s occupation of Northern Africa. After their founding in 1776, the United States of America largely stayed out of this trend until The Spanish-American War of 1898. Following the war, the annexation and colonization of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines ultimately set a precedent for a foreign policy of U.S. imperialism.
“The sun never sets on the British Empire” perfectly described the sheer size of European imperialism. The British Empire was so large that at any given time the sun would always be shinning on some part of the empire. Britain maintained one of the largest empires in Europe. Germany and France had empires that expanded over a much larger region than the areas controlled by the United States. United States politicians never amassed as much land as European powers did. Only the islands of Hawaii, the Philippians, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Cuba were under United States control. Although the U.S. gained Cuba from Spain, Cuba would be liberated. The United States did not conquer nations like the Europeans did; Europeans conquered most of Africa and
“While stands the Coliseum, Rome shall stand; When falls the Coliseum, Rome shall fall; And when Rome falls - the World.” Lord Byron. This essay will discuss the similarities of military, economics and systems of government between the Roman Empire of the 6th century BCE and the United States of America of the 20th century. History has revealed that all superpowers fall eventually, although much time has passed since the glory days of Rome we see in 2015 the largest superpower in charge, the United States. There are many similarities that can be drawn between the American superpower and the Roman Empire such as the same founding of government and both dominated in military, as well as economic similarities. This leads to the conclusion that because the rise to power between the two powers was so similar, the downfall will be equally parallel.
Expansionism in America during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century shared many similarities and differences to that of previous American expansionist ideals. In both cases of American expansionism, the Americans believed that we must expand our borders in order to keep the country running upright. Also, the Americans believed that the United States was the strongest of nations, and that they could take any land they pleased. This is shown in the "manifest destiny" of the 1840's and the "Darwinism" of the late 1800's and early 1900's. Apart from the similarities, there were also several differences that included the American attempt to stretch their empire across the seas and into other parts of the world.
For years, America has always been perceived as one of the top world powers due to its ability of achieving so much technological, economical, and social progress within a mere couple decades. Despite their great accomplishments, America is actually regressing psychologically, preventing the country from reaching its true potential as an “opportunity rich” country. In Anthony Burgess’ Is America Falling Apart? , the author unveils the circumstances in which America’s restricting society and selfish ideology cause the nation to develop into the type of society it tried to avoid becoming when it separated from the British Empire.
Throughout most of the nineteenth century, the United States expanded its territory westward through purchase and annexation. At the end of the century, however, expansion became imperialism, as America acquired several territories overseas. This policy shift from expansionism to imperialism came about as a result of American's experience in the Spanish American War and the Congressional debates that followed the American victory.
After the civil war, United States took a turn that led them to solidify as the world power. From the late 1800s, as the US began to collect power through Cuba, Hawaii, and the Philippines, debate arose among historians about American imperialism and its behavior. Historians such as William A. Williams, Arthur Schlesinger, and Stephen Kinzer provides their own vision and how America ought to be through ideas centered around economics, power, and racial superiority.
As shown, America’s rapid change as the 19th century came to a close was supported by a various amount of imperialistic beliefs, motives, and incidents that almost jumpstarted the U.S. onto the world stage. Many of these incidents such as the public’s thirst for expansion, the annexation of several faraway lands, and the build-up of U.S. military forces would not have been possible without the Spanish American War. Moreover, the Spanish American war would not have been possible without the American people. Imperialism was a consequence of the American Democratic experiment, giving the people what they want.
Rome became a powerful empire engulfing much of Europe, North Africa, and parts of Asia and what seemed like this great entity called the Romans were always in the search of more territory and land to conquer and assimilate into their ever growing vast empire. However, this was not always the case, before Rome became one of the greatest empires in all of history, Rome was a republic. They were government consisted of a Senate who much like our country today represented certain classes of the citizens of the Republic. During the growth and rise of the Roman republic conquering neighboring territories and competing for land grabs was not Romans primary objectives. Romans believed in the well being and wealth of Rome, and if that meant the total destruction of a potential adversary, then as history will show that is unfortunately to the detriment of the adversary what happened.
WWII has a ripple effect across the globe causing changes both internationally and domestically. Internationally, The sun finally began to set over the British Empire with the majority of her majesties colonial possessions gaining independence in the years following the war. Britain’s stage left exit from its hegemonic role resulted in the start of a new “Great Game” between two burgeoning superpowers. A new world order began to take shape with the United States and USSR vying to establish their own hegemony.
The United States, most regularly regarded as the superpower of the world, gained much of its influence during both the Manifest Destiny and New Imperialist eras. Manifest Destiny, lasting during the 19th century, was based on the idea that the United States was justified and deserved to conquer and annex any territory. This resulted in the acquisition of Oregon and part of Mexico. New Imperialism occurred from late 19th century to early 20th century, where America gained land across the globe in many continents. From varying perspectives, Manifest Destiny and New Imperialism were both very similar, whilst very different. The motives for conquering land during these periods were hugely similar, and the wars fought along the way were both alike and unalike. However, the methods of ruling the territories gained were completely different.
The Roman Republic began approximately around 509 B.C. when the nobles drove the King and his family out of Rome. This monumental incident helped shape the start to the transformation of the monarchy into a republican governmental system. This is known to have begun by that of the Roman nobles trying to hold their power that they had gained. The Republic was “[a] city-state [which] was the foundation of Greek society in the Hellenic Age; in the Hellenistic Age, Greek cities became subordinate to kingdoms, larder political units ruled by autocratic monarchs” (Perry 105)
The Roman Republic ultimately failed due to the lack of large-scale wars and other crises that had united the Roman populous early in the history of the Roman Republic. Roman leadership and honor became compromised. In the absence of war and crisis, Rome’s leaders failed to develop the honor and leadership necessary to maintain the Republic.
The “military-industrial complex” is government entities, specifically the Department of Defense, become too “comfortable” with the manufacturers of the weapons it provides for the Armed Forces. The agency grows to ignore the political branches of government, even acting on its own imperatives. This description carries a negative connotation. Some argue that the United States’ worldwide commitments, its large military, and the use of new, high-technology weapons have created a vast industrial machine. This machine is allied with the Pentagon in a way that dominates the political officials who are normally in charge of the Armed Forces. However, the United States has become a world military force because of a decision made by elected officials in 1949-50, not by a military-industrial complex. The industrial machine calls for weapons research, development, and acquisition, but the development and purchase of weapons is made in a wasteful manner. The allocation of funds among the several armed services is also dictated by inter-service rivalry or strategic political motives,
In this paper, I will argue that the current system is hegemonial. My explanation to hegemony will then be centered on the sources of the United States as a hegemonial power. Furthermore, I will state the different primary implications associated with the rise of China and what the Roman Empire offers for understanding the United Sta...