Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of nato after cold war
NATO after the cold war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of nato after cold war
The Possibility of a Role for NATO in International Relations
When NATO was founded in 1949, it had a clearly defined role. It was
an alliance for collective security against the USSR and the Warsaw
Pact, whereby if one member state was attacked, the rest would come to
her aid under article 5. Since the fall of the Soviet Union and the
end of the Cold War, however, the role of NATO has become a great deal
less clearly defined, since its members no longer really have any need
for a defensive alliance. Indeed, operations such as those in Bosnia
and Kosovo have suggested that for from being a defensive alliance,
NATO may have some kind of future as an offensive alliance. There are
also now doubts, however, over whether the futures of Europe and the
United States are bound together as they were during the Cold War, and
many European countries now pursue radically different, more
pacifistic foreign policies to that of America. Many people now fell,
therefore, that NATO is nothing more than an anachronistic hangover
from the Cold War with no real future. Others would say, however, that
organisations such as NATO and the UN are still crucial in the modern
world to ensure that countries do not act unilaterally, but co-operate
with allies. It is first perhaps worth considering in what way NATO's
role in the modern world is changing.
As has already been said, NATO may no longer really be viewed as a
defensive organisation. This is not to say that it no longer has a
credible role, however, and many would argue that it can be used as a
useful tool in solving international problems. There are several
examples of this suggestion in action. For in...
... middle of paper ...
...is an alliance of such different
interests will mean that it's future survival is highly dubious. As
Nicholas Burns, the US Ambassador to NATO, said recently, 'the EU's
push for greater military autonomy [poses] the most significant threat
to NATO's future.'
Thus there is still a role for NATO in the modern world, although this
role has shifted from being defensive to being offensive, as above
examples have shown. The question now must be, then, whether NATO can
function effectively has an organisation in the coming years. Many
would say that the polarising effect of America's aggressive foreign
policy under George Bush and the recent expansion or the organisation
Eastwards towards Russian borders will mean that NATO will cease to
have a role in the future, since it is now a body which such
conflicting interests.
The major factor that led to the true end of the Cold War was the ongoing personal and diplomatic relationship between Presidents George H. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev. This resulted in the reduction of the Russian military and favorable arms agreements. Key indicators of the substance behind this relationship were the Soviet troop withdrawals from Czechoslovakia, Afghanistan, and Hungary (lifting the Hungarian/Austrian “Iron Curtain” along the border). Subsequently the opening of the Berl...
Canada was not just a member of NATO only, but it was also part of NORAD. NORAD is the North American Aerospace Defence Command. It is a USA-Can...
In doing so, this assessment of U.S. interests in Crimea supports the options of non-intervention and a non-provocative stance in order to maintain long-term stability because the Russian invasion has only violated peripheral interests of EUCOM and SACUER. One of EUCOM's primary roles is to strengthen NATO's collective defense and assist its transformation since the fall of the Soviet Union. This is accomplished through building partner capacity to enhance transatlantic security. EUCOM supports American interests in Europe as outlined in the National Security Strategy: The security of the United States, its citizens, and U.S. allies and partners; A strong, innovative, and growing U.S. economy in an open international economic system that promotes opportunity and prosperity; Respect for universal values at home and around the world; and An international order advanced by U.S. leadership that promotes peace, security, and opportunity through stronger cooperation to meet global challenges.
During the Cold War, to protect themselves from the Soviet military threat, the countries of Western Europe and North American formed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, in 1949. Members of NATO agreed that “an attack on one country would be considered an attack on them all. Canada was one of these founding members of NATO. The NATO has now grown to include many more countries. This so-called Canada clause helped ensure that NATO would be more than a defensive military alliance. It would promote friendly relations with other NATO countries. The NATO was Canada’s first peacetime military alliance. At the beginning, the NATO is just like a paper alliance. However, things goanna changed because the start of Korean War. The Korean is a member of NATO. Finally, American sent its troops to Korean and Canada followed. It was a significant impact to Canada’s military. In 1966 France had withdrew of NATO's military structure, although it was still a member of the alliance.
According to Kissinger, Wilson had dreamed of a “Community of Power” that would collectively provide international security. This community would come to be known as the “League of Nations.” Thanks in great part to Wilson’s grand vision, global cooperation is now being achieved through organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). International organizations like the UN and NATO have deep Wilsonian roots. Since 2004, NATO has added nine Baltic states to the organization (making a total of 28 members), which has arguably strengthened security cooperation efforts in that region. It is apparent Wilson’s dream of a “Community of Power” has persevered, due to the continued U.S. practice of promoting democracy as an instrument of conflict
On March 24, 1999, the united countries of North Atlantic Treaty Organization, under pressure from the United States, launched an illegal assault upon a sovereign nation. The evidence is overwhelming that leaders within the United State government sponsored this decision with the extreme perseverance from President of the United States. NATO should have dismissed the request for assault and involvement for it was clearly illegal. It’s perpetrators showed total disregard for Article One of the NATO Charter, which incorporates by reference the United Nations Charter, Chapter One, Article Two, Sections Three, Four and Seven. These sections make it clear that NATO’s role is to be purely defensive. The aggression that NATO has undertaken did not come from or with approval of the UN Security Council, which NATO’s Charter clearly states numerous times that the UN Security Council will convene and approve of any such matter or action. It is a brutal violation of NATO’s Charter and of all principles of international law.
International organizations such as NATO and the UN are essential not only for global peace, but also as a place where middle powers can exert their influence. It is understandable that since the inception of such organizations that many crises have been averted, resolved, or dealt with in some way thro...
...rkforce than ever before. The Soviet Union gained their strength through the Allied victory of the world, and so they dominated Europe. This is what ultimately causes the Cold War, and this also causes an increase in Communist threats in the United States.
...uring the cold war and with relations with foreign nations even long after the cold war.
The Cold War was an ideological battle on how to industrialize aspects of modern society. With countries weakened due to World War II, America and the Soviet Union both rose as a strong, dominant power to the rest of the world. The United States feared that communism would spread through Eastern Europe, then to countries like Italy and France, which would then move to them (The Origins of the Cold War). As Kaufman states in her book “A Concise History of U.S. Foreign Policy”, an unintended consequence of World War II was establishing the context of the Cold War, as a result of the clashing power between the Soviet Union and United States (Kaufman 83). From this, there are many theories that political scientists have established to explain how
...was not to preserve peace, but to preserve the sovereignty and independence of the states of Europe against potential aggressors. The basic rule was to ally against any state threatening domination. The weaker countries would seek alliance with the other weaker states. They would thus create a balance or counterweight against the state whose ascendancy they feared.
The author doesn’t forget to mention the relationship between USA and NATO. He thinks that Americans welcome NATO as a weapon for America’s affairs, not of the world’s. In his final words, it is suggested that either Europe should invite USA to leave NATO or Europe should expel America from it.
The Cold War subsisted as a forty year, or in light of alternate perspectives- perpetuating, conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. Following the conclusion of World War II, the capitali...
In 1945 the United States saw the Soviet Union as its principal ally. By 1947, it saw the Soviet Union as its principal opponent. The United States misunderstood the Soviet regime. .Despite much pretence, national security had not been a major concern of US planners and elected officials. historical records reveal this clearly. Few serious analysts took issue with George Kennan's position that "it is not Russian military power which is threatening us, it is Russian political power" ; or with President Eisenhower's consistent view that the Russians intended no military conquest of Western Europe and that the major role of NATO was to "convey a feeling of confidence to exposed populations, which was suposed to make them sturdier, politically, in their opposition to Communist inroads."
The NATO and Warsaw Pact were formed. This war inevitably led to destructive conflicts like the Vietnam War and Korean War. The Soviet Union collapsed due to its economic weakness. Berlin was destroyed and the two German nations were unified. The Baltic States and some former Soviet Republics gained independence.