The Pros And Cons Of Communism

1101 Words3 Pages

Communism especially spoke to the lower and working classes, who were negatively affected by the progress that modern technology had made. There was a new demand for mass-produced, cheap products that required the cheap labor of millions of poor citizens. Members of the working class were left with no other options, and, in a way, their society abandoned them, as they were forced to work long hours in laborious and menial jobs for little pay. As Marx and Engels observed: “In proportion therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases.” They were not only stating that menial labor deserved more pay then it was getting, but were also attempting to shed light on what they saw as a broken system where the hardest work got …show more content…

For example, while he seemed to want genuine economic equality for everyone, he was also probably immersed in the politics of his own movement, in the sense that he was probably more dedicated to bringing an end to capitalism than truly helping members of the working class. He not only wanted a fair society, but also a total end to capitalism, which would result in less efficient transportation and communications due to a lack of innovation or promotion of growth. More than telling the poor that the Industrial Revolution had caused them countless hardships, the goal, although it wasn’t necessarily reached, was to let them know that the upper class was, in fact, oppressing them. The Manifesto concludes with a rally cry for revolution to those wronged by the competition of capitalism when it said "The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains… Workers of all countries, unite!" Marx and Engels attempted to invoke the anger and rebelliousness of the working class, so that they could gain support for their movement. While many of their views are unrealistic and based on a narrow interpretation of history, some of Marx’s ideas could have helped the lower …show more content…

Socialist theory is difficult to apply practically, because it relies on the idea that everyone will work together happily if given the chance, and that nobody will commit crimes or be lazy. While socialism tends to assume the best of people, capitalism assumes the worst, saying that only the very best will make it to the top, not accounting for the fact that many will cheat or inherit their money. Capitalism assumes that some people are simply better than others, and that the upper class is living a better life because they worked for it and earned it. Communism assumes the opposite, saying that the members of the lower class are inherently better than those in the upper class, because they have worked harder over the course of their lives. Marx may have said this because he was from Germany, a country that was non-democratic at the time, where the rich generally inherited their wealth rather than earning it. Had he come from a place like the US, he most likely would not have had such a bitter view of the upper

Open Document