The Paradigm Of Liberalism: The Paradigm Of Liberalism

The Paradigm of Liberalism

According to Kegley & Wittkopf (2006: 28), liberalism is "a paradigm predicated on the hope that the application of reason and universal ethics to international relations can lead to a more orderly, just, and cooperative world, and that international anarchy [lack of a hierarchy/world government] and war can be policed by institutional reforms that empower international organizations and laws"

IV. Analysis

The role of ILO related to the case of Burma is, they cannot solve the problem clearly because as we know that the US as the superpower country. Chevron is under the US government yet, it is still higher than Myanmar government. This is the main problem in order to solve this kind of problem like the government

In the paradigm of liberalism, making state the existence of an international organization within the scope of dynamic interaction not only interact with other countries, but also with non - actors in the country. International organizations have a specific purpose, and when the country had joined with the organization, then all forms of rights and obligations that exist within international organizations must be met. International organizations addressing global problems. One is the protection of labor. Labor is human beings that contribute to the country's economy. To protect their rights, the state provides a set of rules and laws that protect the rights of labor. Even so, problems of labor protection does not cover all workers in the world, most of them are workers who work in the informal

The result is that the problems of life, especially union workers still not showing positive progress.

From the case of the Burmese people over Chevron Proves that not only the role of international Organizations are a stumbling block that determines the welfare of workers in the country Myanmar, but the important role of the government that the most important. Organizations international institutions such as the ILO is an agency that is not favoring any country, but they act as a mediator for a problem that Occurs between countries. By committing to shared was which makes this international institution formed.

As an international labor organization, the ILO is expected to do more than is done now. But the problem is, the ILO is an institution that does not have the flexibility to do directly to the member states, and tied with a complex bureaucratic system. These conditions were apparently not known to