The article entitled “The Mystery of Bosnia’s Ancient Pyramids is written by Colin Woodward, a freelance writer living in Maine. The article is based on how researches from particular field can oppress experts who are dubious about new findings of an amateur archeologist. The article discusses how Sam Osmanagich, an amateur archeologist, made some discoveries about the world’s oldest pyramids in the Balkans. Throughout his profound researches, accompanied by some professional archeologists, Sam Osmanagich claims that these pyramids are not works from the Mother Nature. After analyzing some core samples from other mountains in the area, he says the results correspond to the same composition found in these pyramids. The amateur archeologist …show more content…
He gives thorough information about Bosnia’s history and its past wars. He wrote this article to inform readers about these ancient pyramids and how different people perceive this matter. Colin Woodard’s information is based on people’s feelings towards Sam Osmanagich’s discoveries and is also based on a scientific process involving projects, and analysis of core samples from the pyramids. Colin’s attitude towards this discovery of these pyramids is neutral. He is neither with, nor against people who refute Sam’s projects. The choices of his words depend on his descriptions of a particular case. For example, when Colin talks about Bosnia’s war, he uses depressing, hateful words. However, when he introduces the media’s positive remarks about Sam’s project, he uses happy, joyful words. The article is not based on one particular word choice. The author is not sarcastic because throughout the article, he didn’t intent upon “tearing apart” Osmanagich’s discussion. He didn’t mock nor deride any of the amateur’s discoveries. Throughout the article, Colin wasn’t trying to be humorous, although he mentioned humorous quotes from other archeologists who thought that Sam’s discoveries are a terrible joke. The dominant tone words used in the article are formal, objective, and
To identify the specific type, functions and time period of the artifacts, various archaeology books, reports, and journal were referred. The interpretation was then conducted by dividing the artifacts into different area on the map and investigating their relationships.
Harding, Anthony (2007) The Great Bosnian Pyramid Scheme. British Archaeology 92, January/February. Web published at: http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba92/feat3.shtml
Çatalhöyük is an archaeological site in Anatolia whose settlement last from approximately 6500 BC to 5720 BC by James Mellaart’s dating. Although the dates given by the current excavating team are from 7300 BC to 6100 BC. Çatalhöyük is most active during the VII to the V levels occurring between 6600 BC to 6300 BC. This can be proven by looking at what makes Çatalhöyük change. Çatalhöyük is a display of amazing continuity over centuries, contrasted strongly by what changes do occur- often in the VII to V levels- in the food related production, the production and use of tools, the changes in house construction, and the tradition that occur inside the home.
The BBC, n.d. Web. The Web. The Web. 21 Apr. 2014 Clark, G. T. "The Archaeological Journal." The Archaeological Journal.
The validity of the conclusion could be better with more evidence from different cemeteries around the country. Therefore due to the limitation of evidence it is possible to lead to inaccurate results. It was also difficult to decipher what some of the inscriptions were as the gravestones have been eroded by the weather (figure 5-5.4).
Weschler, Lawrence. “Vermeer in Bosnia”. Occasions for Writing: Evidence, Idea, Essay. Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle, 2008. 778-785. Print.
Silberman, Neil Asher. “Dead Sea Scrolls.” The Oxford Companion to Archaeology. Ed. Brian M. Fagan, et al. New York: Oxford UP, 1996. 169-71. Print.
The Pyramids of Giza are famous because they needed so many people and so much effort to construct them. There have been many incorrect myths or ideas around who actually built the pyramids, and there are conflicting views. Recent studies say they were built by 10,000 workers, not 100,000, and the workers were not actually slaves of the Pharaoh, but paid and skilled workers, mainly Egyptian’s. It has long believed that this was slave work, but after much investigation, new conclusions have been reached, and it is not viewed as possible to be the work of slaves. They all lived nearby the construction site, in a temporary village made primarily for the workers, where they could stay and access the Pyramids easily. This village was a very organized community, and almost like it a real village, with businesses and houses. It would have been a comfortable residence for all of the workers, but they had a life of constant toil. It is likely that many of the communities across Upper and Lower Egypt would have donated the work...
The Truth Behind: Atlantis Documentary focuses on both supporting and debunking the existence of Atlantis at either the Bahamas, Crete, Knossos, or Thera/Santorini. Throughout this paper I will be deliberating how archeology works at these stated sites, how archeology impacts society as a whole in the context of Atlantis in regards to the modern day fascination and obsession with this seeming mystery, and how archaeological knowledge is acquired and conveyed at the site in order to substantiate certain theories about the past location or Atlantis. Analyzing all of these facets will allow me to think critically about archeology and evidently the archaeological concepts we’ve discussed throughout the course. Atlantis, within this movie, demonstrates
Never before in history did any monument receive such wide attention from the public and media like the Great Sphinx of Giza. The 73.5m long and 20m high (Dieter Arnold) stone carved statue not only fascinates people from all around the world, but also created countless movie ideas, novels, video games and raises questions to those who are interested. Undoubtedly, Sphinx has become one of the most notable figures of ancient Egyptian culture just beside the pyramids in the eyes of westerners. However, many questions remained in mysteries for almost decades until the excavation of 1925 by Emile Baraize revealed the Sphinx’s exotic design to the world's view. Why did the ancient Egyptians build this massive structure? For what purpose would they want to invest such resources and labors to initiate such complex project? How was it built and how did the Egyptians overcome the enormous difficulties with past technologies? The purpose of this paper would be discussing the possible identity of whom the Sphinx might be and compare and analyze the evidence from a material culture point of view. The paper would be lay out to four different sections. First part would briefly describe the purpose of this study as well as giving a brief modern history of the Sphinx. Second part would be discussing the style/meaning and its association and context with the pyramids of the Giza and how the Sphinx was built. The third part would be discussing kings who possibly commissioned the Sphinx to be built and analyze the style of the Pyramid to the style of those kings. Two kings that could be the owner of the Sphinx are Khafra and Khufu, which would be my main focus here and I would be discussing the pros and cons of the scholars’ different ideas. Last p...
This periodical discusses the physical appearance of The Pyramids Of Giza as built by each pharaoh, and also the function of the pyramid as a mortuary temple (Salima Ikram, Janice Kamrin 2012). It also discusses the Pyramids of Giza as great structures of the ancient world (Salima Ikram, Janice Kamrin 2012). This periodical was very important to my understanding as it showcased why Pyramids were so important to the burial process, showing the connection between burial and architecture. The authors of this periodical remain non bias throughout, providing factual information about the Pyramids Of
The Oriental Institute featured an exhibit focused on the development of ancient Middle East Pioneers to the Past: American Archaeologists in the Middle East 1919–20 January 12 - August 29, 2010. And this was the exhibit I found most intriguing and most i...
The construction of the Great Pyramid is still a mystery and marvel to this day, there are seven major feats that archeologists still don’t understand.
According to The Society for American Archaeology, the definition of Archaeology is, “to obtain a chronology of the past, a sequence of events and dates that, in a sense, is a backward extension of history.” The study of ancient civilizations and archaeology is rather ambiguous due to the primitive nature of the time period. With little imagery and even less textual evidence, professionals in the field must work diligently when studying their subjects. Naturally, archaeologists cannot see or communicate with those whom they are studying, so they must be extraordinarily meticulous when analyzing past cultures. This relates to all aspects of the ancient world including; foods, raw materials, artifacts, agriculture, art work and pottery. All of these elements can collectively provide new and innovative information to curious archaeologists who may wish to gain a better understanding of those who came before us. This information is equally beneficial for both historians and archaeologists who plan to compare the histories of societies from all around the world. In the world of archaeology, archaeologists strive to better explain human behavior by analyzing our past. Therefore, the study of archaeology is a key element in understanding a time before our own.
The Great pyramids of Egypt are undoubtedly one of the most recognized and admired landmarks in the world. Built to pay tribute to gods and pharaohs, the pyramids were of great importance to the Egyptians, and the mystery of their construction continues to amaze us today. Many theories pertaining to how the pyramids were built have been suggested, however, none are as well supported or intelligible as the heave-ho method of quarrying and cutting limestone. Joseph Davidovits’ theory disproving this, in which states the pyramids were moulded, is not plausible. Substantial physical evidence which is consistent with the Egyptologists’ portrayal of the heave-ho method has been found. The entire process of building a pyramid with this method is possible, as demonstrated by thorough experiments and analysis of the Egyptian culture. Indisputably, the Great Pyramids of Giza were constructed by quarrying limestone, and the use of ramps, sleds, and cutting tools, owing to the ingenuity and strength of highly organized Egyptian workers.