Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Features of social conflicts
Features of social conflicts
Causes Of ethnic conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Features of social conflicts
Social conflict is as old as human history (Ho-Won Jeong, 2008), it’s dynamics, process and solution has been a subject of inquiry among early thinkers—Machiavelli, Hobbes, Hume, Rousseau etc. Concived by Coser (1968) as “struggle over values or claims to status, power, and scarce resources, in which the aim of the conflicting parties are not only to gain the desired values, but also to neutralize, injure, or eliminate their rivals” (cited in Onyia 2005, p. 17). Efforts at understanding causes and dynamics of social conflict have yielded various typologies. While some of which—corelate of war (COW)—focused on inter-state related wars, thus defined conflict as “involving at least one member of intersate system on each side of the war, resulting …show more content…
Leading this pack is Paul Collier, a mainstream economist. In an inquiry designed to explain ‘why civil wars’ occur in relation to determinant economic variables, Collier and Hoeffler (1996) concluded that ‘income per capita, natural resource endowment, inequality, and ethno-linguistic fragmentation’ are the major risk factors to civil war occurrence (cited in Cramer, 2003, p. 399). They concluded that, rather than cause civil wars, (greater) inequality “significantly reduces the risk and duration of war” (se Cramer, 2003, pp. 399). From their regression analysis which showed an inverse relationship between inequality and conflict, they argue that, a high degree of inequality in a state is indicative of the existence of dominant elite who for the sake of their attachment to the status quo, and desire to protect it, would permit the government to temporarily tax them in other to raise funds to execute war. Knowing this fact would deter potential rebels in that, they [potential rebels] would figure out that the government would have greater capacity to quell any aggression from any quarter. Thus, inequality is not good for conflict (Cramer 2003). Applying the same framework in his later study, Collier (2000a) concluded that, greed not grievance is at the root of civil wars. According to him, “it is the feasibility of predation which determines the risk of conflict. … rebellion is motivated by greed, so that it occurs when rebels can do well out of war” Collier 2000a, cited in Goodhand 2001,
The purpose of this essay is to inform on the similarities and differences between systemic and domestic causes of war. According to World Politics by Jeffry Frieden, David Lake, and Kenneth Schultz, systemic causes deal with states that are unitary actors and their interactions with one another. It can deal with a state’s position within international organizations and also their relationships with other states. In contract, domestic causes of war pertain specifically to what goes on internally and factors within a state that may lead to war. Wars that occur between two or more states due to systemic and domestic causes are referred to as interstate wars.
Rethinking Violence: States and Non-state Actors in Conflict. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2010. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed April 22, 2014).
Walmart can be studied using structure functional theory and social conflict theories. Social functional theory is the relationships among parts of society and how these parts are functional(have beneficial consequences) or dysfunctional (have negative consequences. Most Americans today love to shop at Walmart because they continue to give consumers the best prices on over 120,000 products and are one stop shopping.
...to be achieved, years, decades, lifetimes, conflict is intended to fulfill this need. Ultimately, conflict theory is about the struggles, ideologies, representations, and power that the haves possess and the have-nots want to exert. These concepts come into play causing conflict between the groups which ends in social change.
Did you know that in 2014, shoplifting and worker’s theft cost the retail industry a loss of thirty-two billion dollars (Wahba, 2015)? According Wahba “a common misperception about shoplifting is that retailers can ‘afford’ the loss of a candy bar or a pair of jeans” (2015). This type of reasoning certainly does make more sense when explained through the context of a criminological theory. For example according to the Rational Choice theory individuals weigh the costs and benefits associated with a criminal and or deviant act and then make a conscious choice. Other criminological theories explain criminal and deviant behavior using a biological, psychological, social, conflict, or multifactor component. Taking that into consideration in this
By definition, conflict theory basically sees the society as a pitch in which inequality thrives in order to generate conflict and change. For instance, this theory emphasizes on the purpose of coercion in generating a social order that’s often ch...
“In sociology, a theory is the framework for analysis that outlines what to focus on and provides predictions about logical outcomes within the framework.” (Durkin & Carrothers, 2015, Ch. 1.3, para 1) Sociologists have been trying to create a single theory to give explanations and understandings towards social and human behavior. However, this has only caused more theoretical perspectives to sprout and has led to the creation of three main theoretical perspectives within sociology. These perspectives are used to explain the social behavior and phenomena that are experienced and shown by humans. The perspectives are functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interaction. This paper will focus on conflict theory and the influence that Karl
“We all fight on two fronts, the one facing the enemy, the other facing what we do to the enemy” (Boyden 199).
Pruitt, Dean G, and Sung Hee Kim. Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. 3rd ed. 2004. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2004.
The significance of the third article is that Weidmann finds the same results that Collier, Hoeffler, and Rohner do in their article “Beyond Greed and Grievance: Feasibility and Civil War." Weidmann finds that motivation is not a cause of civil war on the territorial domain and that opportunity instead is a cause of civil war. This finding supports Collier, Hoeffler, and Rohner’s argument discussed in their article who also find that motivation does not relate to civil war onset.
There are three main theories of sociology; functionalism, conflict theory and symbolic interactionism. This paper will focus on two of those theories, functionalism and conflict theory. The objective is to delineate the assumptions of two out of the three theoretical perspectives and apply these assumptions to an analysis of social stratification. How this will be accomplished will be by comparing and contrasting their assumptions and by analyzing the two theories affect on social stratification. Then I will state my opinion on which of the two better fits my personal sociological views. Functionalism is many people's way to view the world sociologically. It states clearly that the objectivity of the researcher is necessary and can be accomplished. There are three main points, which make up a functionalist theory on sociological expression. The first point is that culture is made up of interacting, interdependent parts. Each of these parts has a function in maintaining the society as a system on the whole. The second point states that shared values and expectations(or beliefs) among the members of the society help hold the society together. The third point states that these systems have a need for stability and a need to try to keep all the parts working together congruously in a sort of system. Social change in this system is uncommon, and when it does happen, it is a very gradual change. Conflict theory is centered on the tension, or struggle that goes on in everyday life. There are many different parts, which make up the conflict theorist's view on the sociological perspective. The first main part is that society promotes general differences in wealth, power, and prestige. Wealth...
Sociologists analyze human society and interaction using varied ideas and trends. There are three main thought processes used when deciphering social interactions. Structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism are used to understand how society works. There are strengths and weaknesses that are attributed to each of the theories.
The perspective I have chosen is the social-conflict theory. The social-conflict paradigm is a framework for building theory that envisions society as an arena of inequality generating conflict and social change. This type of analysis focuses on the inequalities within our society and the conflict that they cause between the advantaged and the disadvantaged.
From this perspective, the question as to whether politics can or cannot adequately resolve conflict takes a new form, whereby the question becomes whether the conflicts that are essential to politics simply become so debilitating that political organizations such as governments can no longer function. If conflict is essential to politics, therefore, then we cannot expect politics to resolve all conflict: it rather, instead, must be expected to continually re-define where irresolvable conflict lies in the social organization. This is not a critique of the effectiveness of politics itself, but rather a critique of what we expect from politics: it becomes a naïve position to think that politics can resolve all our conflicts if it is in fact founded in forms of conflict.
At some point in time we will all experience interpersonal conflicts at home, among friends, in church, and with co-workers. Although we cannot avoid all interpersonal conflicts we can allow the New Testament to guide our management and response to interpersonal conflicts. Recently I have experienced an interpersonal conflict in my personal life with my significant other. After sharing twenty-one years together, bringing two children into this world, and building a comfortable life with one another everything changed when I became aware that he was involved with another woman for an extended period of time. This has been one of the most difficult times that I have experienced and a time that I relied heavily on God to provide me strength and