The Hungry Tide Analysis

787 Words2 Pages

Another significant opposition between the city and country is the type of education or knowledge that is provided for the children. Within the city, it is of high importance to receive a school based education that teaches a child about language, math, science, and much more. However, in the country, this type of education is unnecessary. Instead, children in the country learn about fishing, farming, and other skills needed for survival. In the novel The Hungry Tide, the main character Kanai is taught many lessons on what type of knowledge is of greater value. Kanai grew up in the large city of Calcutta, and then moved to New Delhi as an adult. His first time out of the city is when he visits his aunt and uncle in Lusibari. Growing up in the …show more content…

After his reaction Nimilma states, “Don’t act like you know everything. You’re not in Calcutta now” (Ghosh, 25). Nilima’s response is the first time Kanai has ever been accused of not knowing something. Later on when Kanai returns to Lusibari, he again is shown that all of his knowledge cannot compare to the local knowledge that Fokir has. During the story, Piya is praising Fokir for his ability to track dolphins. Kanai grows frustrated at her admiration and states, “ADD QUOTE” Throughout his stay, he begins to accept the idea that he his top notch education did not teach him everything, and that the people of Lusibari may be more intelligent that he will ever be. The knowledge provided from spending time in the country is one facet that makes people feel connected to the location.
The values and work ethic provided by the country help create a connection and sense of place for its inhabitants that they cannot receive within the confines of the city. In the story The Hungry Tide, the reader is introduced to Kusum. The story shares her experiences in the city, and why she ultimately returns to the tide country. After the loss of her father,

Open Document