Sylvia Plath Comparison Analysis

764 Words2 Pages

In American society, the common stereotype is that the father has the role of the dominant figure in the household. Sylvia Plath and Sharon Olds may come across as two seemingly different poets, however, they are really quite similar, especially in their driving forces behind their writing styles in poetry. The lives of Plath and Olds are both expressive of the realities of a father-dominated family, in which both of these poets lost their fathers at a young age. This is significant because both poets have faced a similar traumatic event that has had everlasting effects on their adult womanhood, which is reflected in their writings. For both these woman, their accesses to father-daughter relationships were denied based on life circumstances. Ironically, their fathers were their muses for writing and are what made them the women they are today.
In “The Colossus” Plath expresses her personal and emotions struggles she faced resulting from her father’s death. Plath’s father, Otto Plath was nonexistent. “Plath’s relationship with her father has proven to be one of the more troublesome of her recurrent themes in this respect. By all accounts, including her own, Otto Plath was a kind, loving father, if formal and somewhat remote, and there was little outward evidence that their relationship was troubled” (John Rietz 417). Plath yearned for the everlasting love that she never received from her father growing up. It’s almost as if she was constantly trying to force building a relationship that she never had with her father. “Otto Plath was her muse” (417). This notion is best represented in Plath’s poem, “The Colossus” by the speaker’s constant efforts to reconstruct the fallen Colossus of Rhodes representing her relationship with her...

... middle of paper ...

...ugh she knows that she won’t be successful. Plath, through the poem’s speaker, is trying to rebuild the disintegrated Colossus of her father, “dredg[ing] the silt from [his] throat” to comprehend “the god” (father) that she has never got a chance to know (9). The speaker’s restoration of the Colossus was the closest Plath could ever come to achieving the relationship with her father that she desired during his life alive.A girl’s relationship with her father is critical to childhood development. Crain writes “Certain findings uphold the notion that the father’s presence is more important for a boy than for a girl... this is also important for the girl’s identification” (344). The Colossus not only represents Plath’s father, but it also depicts the portrayal psychological effects of father- daughter relationship, in which this case the father is absent. Rietz writes:

Open Document