Sutherland's Differential Association: Why People Commit Crimes

720 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Causes of criminal behaviour in the society

Sutherland would respond to my friend’s comment by saying that differential association is the reason how and why people commit crime. Differential Association is where a person learns criminal behavior through interaction among relationships (family and friends). As people grow and continue to interact with the people around them they learn what is and what is not acceptable in society (“definitions”) (Text, Part IV). Sutherland’s differential association theory has nine key components that explain criminal offending. These nine components are : criminal behavior is learned, it is learned interactions and communication between others, usually learned within well-known groups, when crime is learned techniques and motives are decided, it is learned from legal definitions, excess of incentives will increase the likelihood of criminal behavior, differential associations will fluctuate, there is a process just like with anything else being learned, and finally needs and wants of an individual’s influences a person’s motives/criminal behavior (Lecture and text, CH10). Akers …show more content…

As children we learn what is right and wrong from our parents and what they see as right and wrong. We learn to talk, walk, and eat from the imitations of observed behavior of our parents. As we continue to grow we build relationships among our peers and we learn positive and negative behaviors from our friends and from watching others. If a person is taught negative behavior through friends and family negative behavior and actions will be the outcome. Building on Akers findings of imitation and reinforcement a person learning from past mistake will less likely maybe to commit criminal behavior (text, CH11). Positive and negative reinforcement will play a large role in deterrence of behavior for an individual. Along with learning processes there could be internal and external factors that influence criminal behavior in an

Show More
Related

  • Nature versus Nurture: Criminal Behavior

    2165 Words  | 5 Pages

    Within the past decade there has been a wide range of research and evidence available based on both sides of the nature or nurture debate. Along with further research that identifies a number of determinants that have some form of influence towards criminal behavior and activity. This researc...

    Read More

  • Columbine Shooting Essay

    2357 Words  | 5 Pages

    Secondly, differential association varies based on the intensity, duration, frequency, priority, and timing of one’s process of learning. Through this notion, the individual’s self is disregarded and more emphasis is placed on the extrinsic factors. Furthermore, “it is an individual’s experiences and the ways in which the individual defines those experiences which constitute to the learning of criminality”. (Gongenvare & Dotter, 2007,

    Read More

  • Edwin Sutherland's Differential Association Theory Of Criminal Behavior

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    Edwin Sutherland’s differential association theory can help us address these issues (the theory was meant to explicate how criminals came to

    Read More

  • Social Control and Bond Theories

    1715 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to Hirschi (1969) control theories assumes that all humans as a part of their nature are naturally prone to break the law. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) control and bond theories state that humans are free to commit crimes if their social ties are weak or broken. Hirschi (1969) stated an interesting premise about human nature when he stated that all human beings are innately selfish and will pursue crime as a means to secure self gratification. According to Hirschi (1969) control theories created a new chapter in criminology, and began to ask “why do some people not commit crime?,” instead of continuing to ask “why do they commit crime?”. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) Travis Hirschi control theory differed from previous theories such as differential association theory and strain theory. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) differential association theory focused on the role that peers and social groups played on the development of delinquent behaviors. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) the differential association theory as like other learning theories believed that the motivation to commit crime was the result of social interaction with deviant sub groups in which an individual learned to positively value committing criminal behavior. Furthermore, Cullen and Agnew (2011) stated that strain theory placed an individual’s motivation to commit crime with an individuals strained relationship, and experience with society that led people to commit crime in order to relieve the strain. According to Gottredson and Hirschi (1990) people develop strain which eventually lead to crime causing frustration based on lack of means to satisfy their human needs, and desires which leads to crime.

    Read More

  • Robert Merton's Strain Theory

    594 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this case, differential association may be useful in identifying sources of strain not limited to economics, as Sutherland and Cressey argue that associations, and consequently motives for committing crimes, are context-dependent. Moreover, differential association can further explain why people who lack legitimate means to success resort to criminal behavior rather than conformity. Consider an individual who, like many others, has celebrated goals, although this person’s legitimate means to this goal are blocked. Differential association theory states that if criminal behaviors, including techniques of committing the crime, are learned, this person is more likely to pursue illegitimate means to success rather than conforming to the overarching social structure. Conversely, if this person is not engaged with others who exhibit delinquent patterns, they are more likely to not become delinquent in times of strain. Ultimately, strain theory offers a substantial explanation of how criminal behavior is shaped by social structure, and differential association theory provides micro-level explanations that serve to complement the limitations of the broader structural

    Read More

  • Criminological Theories Explaining Behaviors of The Cocaine Kids

    1362 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first criminological theory, that explains behavior of the drug sellers, is the theory of Differential Association. Differential Association, termed by Edwin Sutherland, argued that persons engage in delinquent behavior because they learn it from society and they engage in it when it benefits them. By this, he is saying that an individual will be a criminal if they experience an excess of criminal definitions over conventional definitions. Sutherland discovered that Differential Association is developed through various stages and he explains such development with the use of nine propositions. (Lily et al. 2011, 48) Such propositions are as follows: (1) criminal behavior is learned, (2) it...

    Read More

  • The Differential Association Theory

    1320 Words  | 3 Pages

    This theory is based on the work of Sociologist Edwin Sutherland. Differential association theory states that people learn criminal behavior through the social groups with which they associate. If a person associates with a group that defines criminal behavior as acceptable, the person will probably engage in criminal behavior due to their influence. The theory stresses the impact that others have on one’s view of deviant behavior (Kendall,

    Read More

  • Joe Smith Case Study Essay

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Once a criminal, always a criminal.” This is a common saying and turn out to be true most of the times. Usually, the criminal attitude gets developed at early ages because of unfavourable social situations to which a youth gets exposed to, either intentionally or unintentionally. Later on negligence of law becomes personality attribute that leads to delinquent behaviours.

    Read More

  • Crime Theory Essay

    1049 Words  | 3 Pages

    The learning theory was described by Tarde as “something learned by normal people as they adapted to other people and the conditions of their environment” (Bohm & Haley, 73) this was set to be called imitation. But, further studies of this theory by Sutherland developed that “persons become criminal do so because of contacts with criminal definitions and isolation from anti-criminal definitions” (Bohm & Haley, 73). In other words, crimes varied in how the community was structured. Advancements to the theory followed and divided the learning theory into four sections positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, extinction and punishment. The idea of positive reinforcement meant that people did something for the reward such as stealing. The negative reinforcement is something that takes away and increases response, such as drug addicts to relieve pain. Further research of the theory led to criminals can experience extinction which is “behavior that previously was positively reinforced is no longer reinforced” and punishment which is “aversive stimulus to reduce a response”. These ideas emerged and advanced the learning theory. The learning theory was then seen as a theory to punish criminals for their actions, in order to cause extinction. Since Tarde’s explanation to now the learning theory has drastically advanced and provided many answers as to find ways to why one commits crimes and why

    Read More

  • Differential Association-Reinforcement

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1947 Sociologist Edwin Sutherland (and later Melvin DeFleur, Richard Quinney, Robert Burgess, and Ronald Akers; as seen in Burgess & Akers, 1966) posited that criminal behavior is at least partially learned and that our social networks play a vital role in this process. Later research provided empirical support to this (Akers, Krohn, & Lanza-Kaduce, 1979). In this view, criminal behavior is learned both socially and non-socially though operant conditioning. The individual’s social networks (e.x. family and friends) are the primary source for reinforcement of these behaviors (Burgess & Akers, 1966). In essence our social networks teach us both specific behaviors as well as the social norms of our (sub) culture. When we behave a certain way, our behavior is reinforced or punished. Behavior that is reinforced is more likely to continue.

    Read More

  • Determinism And Criminal Behaviour

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    It suggests that criminal behaviour develops due to what children observe at home during early childhood and they then demonstrate these behaviours when they are older. One study illustrated the effects of modelling and how it can influence anti-social behaviours in children. Bandura (1965), showed a video clip to children of an adult attacking a bobo doll violently, for example kicking and punching. The results showed that children who observed this were more aggressive towards the bobo doll than the control group. This suggests that behaviour is a result of modelling and that children are easily influenced and will imitate what they observed. Therefore, arguing that criminal behaviour is a result of behaviour we learned during early childhood. (Christi Bergin & David Bergin,

    Read More

  • The Myth Of Criminal Behavior

    698 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this Paper, I will be exploring the myth that criminal behavior is caused by the environment in which a person grows up in. This paper will basically discuss the long-time argument of nature vs nurture. The nature theorists believe that criminal behavior is biological and inherited in genetics, while the nurture theorists believe that everyone is born the same way and the way they are raised plus the environment around them influence criminal behavior. This is relevant because it’s a very big topic not only in criminal justice, but also in psychology as it involves the way people interact within society and the development of criminal behavior. I also have always been intrigued with the nature vs nurture debate and would like to know more

    Read More

  • The Development of a Criminal Mind

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    In today’s society, one will find that there are many different factors that go into the development of a criminal mind, and it is impossible to single out one particular cause of criminal behavior. Criminal behavior often stems from both biological and environmental factors. In many cases criminals share similar physical traits which the general population do not usually have. For example criminals have smaller brains than properly adjusted individuals. However biological reasons cannot solely be the cause of criminal behavior. Therefore, one must look to other sources as to how a criminal mind is developed. Social and environmental factors also are at fault for developing a person to the point at which they are lead to committing a criminal act. Often, someone who has committed a violent crime shows evidence of a poorly developed childhood, or the unsuitable current conditions in which the subject lives. In addition if one studies victimology which is the role that the victim plays in the crime, it is apparent that there are many different causes for criminal behavior. Through the examination of biological factors, in addition to the social and environmental factors which make up a criminal mind, one can conclude that a criminal often is born with traits common to those of criminals, it is the environment that exist around them that brings out the criminal within them to commit indecent acts of crime.

    Read More

  • Social Learning and Social Process Theory

    769 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some people argue that people don't learn criminal behavior before they act on them. Siegel's say's (2011) "little evidence exists that people learn the techniques that enable them to become criminals before they actually commit criminal acts." (p.179). Learning theories do have a role in the study of delinquency and criminal behavior. Siegel says (2011) "they help explain the role that peers, family, and education play in shaping criminal and conventional behavior." (p.179).

    Read More

  • The Causes of Criminal Behavior

    776 Words  | 2 Pages

    Different schools of thought propose varying theoretical models of criminality. It is agreeable that criminal behaviour is deep rooted in societies and screams for attention. Biological, Social ecological and psychological model theories are key to helping researchers gain deeper comprehension of criminal behaviour and ways to avert them before they become a menace to society. All these theories put forward a multitude of factors on the outlooks on crime. All these theories have valid relevancy to continuous research on criminal behaviour.

    Read More

More about Sutherland's Differential Association: Why People Commit Crimes

Open Document