More handpicked essays just for you.
Medical advances using animal testing
Alternative methods for animal testing
Positive effects of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Certain countries are considering a ban on animal testing and experimentation. I disagree with this ban on animal testing. While it may seem that animal testing is cruel and unethical, it has helped both humans and animals in many ways. For example, many horrible diseases that have been cured have, at some point used animal testing. This and many other reasons is why there should not be a ban on animal testing. Firstly, animal testing helps scientists learn how the human body works without actually experimenting on humans. The animals most commonly used in experiments are mice and rats. The California Biometrical Research Association says rats and mice are effective for experiments concerning humans due to the fact that, “mice share more than 98% DNA with humans…” This means that humans and mice share many similar problems and disabilities, making them a good organism to test. Many scientists do these tests to cure illnesses and to find answers that they could not determine in computer or cell and tissue tests. Another reason why I disagree with this ban on animal testing is because computer tests and bacterial research cannot explain everything. As DR. Bella Williams of Understand …show more content…
This is partially true, if something of this caliber were to be done to humans it would be worse than death. On the contrary, animal research has provided humans with revolutionary results, and the California Biometrical Research Association states, “... after many years of research using rats, mice, and monkeys, polio vaccines were developed and used to to treat this disease.” This, along with breakthroughs in cancer, HIV/AIDS, asthma, antibiotics, organ transplants, and high blood pressure research, have all been done with the help of animal testing and experimentation. Also, other types of research is used, as few as possible animals are consumed, and technology has been refined to reduce
Is animal testing really worth taking away animal’s valuable lives? No, I think it’s wrong, inhumane, and cruel. Animals have feelings like humans do and they should be treated with respect even though they are just animals.When animals are tested over time they live in cruel and harsh conditions. They are tied up and changed to their cages or devices they are being tested on. Almost all tests fail in humans and it is not worth sacrificing an animals life.Think about all the things animals have to go through all the harsh and cruel treatment.They are put in conditions where they are not allowed to eat or drink and move around. Is it really worth killing an animals for eyeliner that will never hit the market or for drugs that all fail in humans. So here are some of the reasons I think we should ban all animal testing.
Without animal research, cures for such diseases as typhoid, diphtheria, and polio might never have existed. Without animal research, the development of antibiotics and insulin would have been delayed. Without animal research, many human beings would now be dead. However, because of animal testing, 200,000 dogs, 50,000 cats, 60,000 primates, 1.5 million hamsters, and uncounted millions of rats and mice are experimented upon and die each year, as living fodder for the great human scientific machine. Some would say that animal research is an integral part of progress; unfortunately, this is often true. On the whole, animal testing is a necessary evil that should be reduced and eliminated whenever possible.
...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation and animal research, is using various nonhuman animals experiments, whether it be a psychological or physical test of the animal, or testing medicines and cosmetics to determine if they are good enough for human use and consumption.This specific kinds of research are often conducted at various medical institutes, universities, pharmaceutical companies, and commercial facilities that does the task of testing the products on the animals. Each year, more than 100 million animals are used and die in the name of scientific research. Those animals include rats (12%), frogs (1%), cats (0.8%), dog (0.6%), mice (69%), monkeys (0.1%), guinea pigs (1%), rabbits (1%), fish (10%), and birds (4%). (BBC) Just like anything else, animal research has its pros and cons, but in this case, the cons severely outweigh the pros.
According to the California Biomedical Research Association, almost every medical advancement in the last 100 years is a direct result of animal testing and research. The use of animals has become standard procedure in a wide range of testing and experimentation, including product toxicity testing, biomedical and veterinary experiments, drug development and testing, and education. Major advancements in treating and understanding chronic conditions such as cancer, cystic fibrosis, malaria, and tuberculosis, have been achieved due to animal research. Also, the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics are also direct results of the testing and observation of animals. On the other hand, many people believe that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. In many laboratories animals are subjected to force feeding, food and water deprivation, physical restraints, and infliction of pain. Because the animals cannot protect themselves, many people argue that exploiting animals to better the lives of humans is wrong and should not be permitted.
One word comes to mind when I think of animal testing: cruel. Animal testing has been a subject of debate for many years. While most people think that using animals to test products is a reasonable approach, in reality the outcome does not always show how the products will react on humans, and the animals suffer unnecessarily. The United States needs to ban all animal testing like the European Union did because testing on animals is cruel and animals should not be dying from it.
Animal testing should not be allowed because it abuses animals who cannot defend themselves. It is clear that there are other ways to test medicines, vaccines, and procedures but the government still allows people to test on animals. It is unfair to abuse an animal that cannot defend itself when 7 billion people are on the earth who would give more accurate feedback. The number of people is overwhelming that could instead of abusing animals, we could test on inmates and volunteers who can consent to the possible issues that may come with the tests. Animal testing should not be allowed because it leads to animal cruelty and does not allow us to exercise other methods of
In conclusion, animals should not have to go through the harmful and painful practices of animal testing because it’s humane, it violates the rights of animals and there are safer and more reliable alternatives. There are so many different reasons to stop animal testing, all of these things are done to animals in laboratories but if they were to be done outside of these places they would all be considered as crimes, so why should it be legal in laboratories? Animal testing is not only inherently wrong, but promotes unsafe and inhumane business practices that affects the animal’s life. Animal testing should be stopped immediately.
...Wright). Many people will deny that animal testing is wrong because it produces valuable drugs and medical research that can be used to save or benefit human life. These people who defend animal testing and believe that it is an acceptable practice never bring up the fact that the experiments take place behind closed doors. If animal testing is the legal and wonderful method for curing disease, developing surgical practices, and testing the safety of various products that it is perceived to be by its supporters then it should be out in the open. Animal testing always has been and likely always will be kept hidden away from the public’s view because the companies and labs that perform the experiments realize that if their projects are allowed to see the light of day, there will be a backlash of indescribable proportions by the public for their crimes against nature.
According to the article” Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing,” animals’ rights are violated when the sciences are doing the research and there are many similar ways between humans and animals, such as how they feel and behave. Even though animals cannot express their opinions, they still feel, think, and experience pain. When the sciences use animals to do the research, humans still need to respect them because of animals’ rights. Animals have their opinions they cannot explain and humans have a duty to protect animals’ rights. Animal testing should be banned because humans need to respect their minds.
This alone made all the testing and suffering that the animals went through to waste. In conclusion I believe animal testing should be banned because it’s not necessary and there's enough evidence support my
Animals have been used in testing since around 322 BC, and no one has done anything to stop this (Hajar). Medical breakthroughs and safety procedure would have been easily accomplished without the torture of these animals. To ensure the safety of a product tests are conducted and due to these tests 115 million animals are killed worldwide. (About Animal Testing). Animal Testing should be banned because animals are put under harsh conditions and their lives should not be at risk for our selfish needs.
The people claim that, animal testing infringes animal’s rights, makes animal suffering in the experiments, and some of animal experiments may never be useful to human beings. This is true, but we cannot stop animal testing. According to the article “Facts about Animal Research” by Cook (2006), the smallpox has disappeared from the earth because scientists get vaccines from cows. Also, the scientists got insulin, which is the only drug, which can control diabetes, from dogs and fish. Many medicines are related to medical animal experiments, we cannot give up medical animal experiments.
First of all, animal testing should be banned in order to protect the rights of animals. In other words, animals’ rights are infringed by experimenting on them. Animals and humans are similar in many ways. To begin with, they have similar levels of biological complexity. They both are aware that they exist and they both make conscious choices. Philosophy professor at North Carolina State University Tom Regan points out "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment." (F. B. Orlans) Experimentation on an animal ...
In conclusion, there are many reasons to stop experimenting on animals. As mentioned above If the animals are tested out of the laboratories it is considered as crime. Moreover it is very expensive to test on animals. It clearly exhibits that negative effects are more domination than positive effects. In my opinion scientists must be banned to test on animals.