Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note on risk assessment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction to Risk assessment
Definition:
Risk assessment is a method used to recognize the hazardeous features of known infectious agents or materials. To identify those agents and materials which are responsible for laboratory associated infections. To select the appropriate precautions, evaluate the proficiencies of workers conerning safe practices and safety equipments.
Importance of Risk assessment
Risk assessment gives us information to select the biosafety levels, in which we can classify them on the basis of risk group classification of agents. Containment includes standard microbiological practices, safety equipments, facility safeguards and design. Thus containment is the basic objective for biosafety levels. [1]
Risk assessment gives us information to recongnize the interventions that leads to the improvement of health and safety to the workers, public and to the environment. Risk assessment also can be used to identify data gaps and objective research that should have the greatest value in terms of public health impact. [2]
Risk assessment provides wide information to develop a standard microbiological and clinical laboratory. Have a great importance in medical field.
Microbiological risk assessments have an important role in the safety management of food in food industries, and in pharmaceutical industries. [3]
Types of Risk assessment
Quantitative Risk assessment
Quantitative risk assessment is used for particular purposes. This menthod provides numerical evaluation of risks.
Qualitative Risk assessment
This is the simplest method to evaluate the risks. By this method we can assess the physical, chemical, and biological hazards qualitatively. We...
... middle of paper ...
...This procedure apply for equivalent procedure report for BSL-3 requirements, this course of action is applies to Agent which are certified by NIH, who provides the certification facility services. Only NIH accridited certifying Agents are allowed to apply for equivalency request procedure. [18]
Conclusion
It has been concluded that Risk assessment for BSL-3 is the basic method which evaluates the hazards associated with those microbial agents which are assigned to BSL-3 by knowing their routes of transmission, and their ability to cause diseases. To identify the hazards associated with the laboratory procedures. To select the special practices, precautions and equipments specified for BSL-3, to evaluate the proficiencies of workers concerning safe practices and safety equipments. Risk assessment provides the basic structure to construct a standard BSL-3 laboratory.
Throughout the risk assessment process, ideas for action were identified and documented. The documentation of these ideas led to the development of potential action item worksheets which were then selected, prioritized, and refined. Detailed risk assessment information for each hazard is included and located through this document.
There are three risk levels (low, medium and high) associated with sterile compounding. CSPs are assigned a risk level based on the probability of contaminating the preparation during compounding with microbial contaminants e.g. spores or endotoxins and chemical and physical contaminants e.g. skin particles from staff or broken glass. Once a CSP is classified, a licensed healthcare professional overseeing the sterile compounding can then decide upon the most suitable procedure and environmental quality of the facility which are necessary for preparing the CSP. The risk levels apply to the quality of the CSP d...
Department of health (2007) say that there are 3 types of risk assessment:the unstructured clinical approach, the actuarial approach and the structured clinical approach (DOH 2007). Many Mental health Professionals over the past years have used the unstructured clinical approach to risk assess. This is based on your experience and judgement to assess the risk. However this way has been criticized for not being structured and this then leads to inconsistency and to be unreliable (Turner and Tummy 2008). This approach would not be useful for the case with Julie as she is not known to services and every person is different as you may not have seen her symptoms before if you base the risk assessment on experience.
From the ancient times civilization kept evaluating, by discovering and exploring something new and, as a result, facing new hazards. Within the last few decades traditional society has moved to modern one. Within that period, huge progress towards modernity has been made and lots of innovations have been introduced to society, what have resulted in new dangers and risks. Nowadays, accurate calculation and consideration of risk-acceptance, risk-assessment and control cannot be fully complete because at any time there are unpredicted and undesired aspects of risk environments. It can be seen more clearly at the level of global dangers, such as chemical, nuclear, technological, ecological, industrial and genetic engineering hazards, which cannot
Biological monitoring is basically evaluating a sterilization process by rendering highly resistant bacterial spores biologically inert. The highly resistant bacterial spores used varies depending on what kind of sterilizer was used. For example Bacillus stearothermophilus spores for steam and chemical vapor sterilizers, Bacillus subtilis spores for dry heat and ethylene oxide sterilizers. These specific Bacillus spores are used because they are more resistant, and present in greater numbers than are the common microbial contaminants found on patient care equipment. If it is proven that these spores have been killed, it is strongly implied that other potential pathogens in the load have also been killed.
A health appraisal or health risk assessment is a method of gathering and analyzing an individual's physical health. By comparing one's result to that of a standard age group, health care providers are able to predict future health problems as well as informing the patient of alternative and healthier lifestyles. It is important for an individual to know their health status compared to those around them. That way, one is able to participate in physical activities that will improve their overall well-being.
Safe working practices in a laboratory are regulated to ensure a safe and manageable environment within a laboratory in order to make practises efficient and safe. In a laboratory all staff and employees should know the types of hazard they are dealing with when it comes to chemicals and substances, they should also be aware of events that they may have never come across before and they also need to be aware of the personal protective equipment and facilities that reduce the risks which include showers and eye wash stations and in order for these facilities to be useful and effective then lab workers must know where these are located and how to operate them to ensure safety when using such equipment. Furthermore safe working practices are
...e of bacterial contamination of raw materials subject to environmental pollution, sterilization is not complete, improper storage methods and unsanitary operations.
A lab can be a hazardous place to work. There are inflammable solvents, poisonous and corrosive chemicals, electrical tools, delicate glassware, and more (Coen.boisestate, 2015). The possible for injury from these dangers can be decreased if people are aware of and follow appropriate safety procedures (Coen.boisestate, 2015). The most important safety precaution which can take is to come to lab totally prepared, and to think about what you doing every step of the way (Coen.boisestate, 2015). The most dangerous thing in a lab is an unprepared student trying to carry out a technique he or she does not understand (Coen.boisestate, 2015).
Food safety is a quite hot topic and important public health issue all over the world. Food-borne disease can cause serious harm. Millions of people suffered from diseases and even died because of having unsafe food.
A SWOT analysis of the food control system in Bahrain revealed that certain strengths and weaknesses are inherent in the system. In addition to the weaknesses and the strengths, there are threats that would negatively affect the system if not prevented or brought under control. Nevertheless, the there are opportunities available for responding to the threats, making the Bahrain food control systems more efficient and effective. It is therefore important that some or all of these strengths, opportunities, threats, and weaknesses are reviewed. Conspicuous among the weaknesses is the fact that limited resources are available for the agencies and the personnel employed in the Bahrain food control system. Related to lack of resources is the lack of skills and competencies in applying modern techniques, more so in microbiological and chemical analysis. The second weakness of the Bahrain food control system is that most of the laws and regulations on food safety and control are not based on risk- or science-based analysis. In other words, the laws could be outdated and irrelevant in comparison with the latest mechanisms by which pathogens and other contaminants affect foodstuffs (Nestle, 2007). Furthermore, Bahrain lacks the technical expertise or competent enough personnel who could assess the effectiveness and the applicability of their food control laws.
Food safety is an increasingly important public health issue. Governments all over the world are intensifying their efforts to improve food safety. Food borne illnesses are diseases, usually either infectious or toxic in nature, caused by agents that enter the body through the ingestion of food. “In industrialized countries, the percentage of people suffering from food borne diseases each year has been reported to be up to 30%. In the United States of America, for example, around 76 million cases of food borne diseases, resulting in 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths, are estimated to occur each year.” (Geneva 2)
The biosafety program ensures the competency of the laboratory staff in safely performing their job through training and documentation of technical expertise. The laboratory staff must manifest professional responsibility for management of research materials complying with appropriate materials management procedures. A hallmark of biosafety practices requires laboratory access to be limited to essential personnel only when work with biological agents is in progress. Biosecurity practices on the other hand ensure that access to the laboratory facility and biological materials are limited and controlled. An inventory system must also be in place so as to control and track biological stocks or other potentially hazardous biological agents in both biosafety and biosecurity programs. For biosafety, the transfer and shipping of infectious biological materials must comply with safe packaging, containment and appropriate transport procedures, while biosecurity ensures that transfers are controlled, tracked and documented relative to the potential risks of the materials being transferred. Both programs must involve the laboratory staff in the development of practices and procedures that fulfills the requirements of biosafety and biosecurity initiatives without hindering research or clinical/diagnostic activities. The success of both of these programs is anchored on a laboratory culture
A hazard is defined as an activity or object that has the potential to cause harm if contact is made with the person, object or activity (MHS, 1996; Harmse, 2007; HSE, 2006). These hazards in a work place need to be identified and dealt with accordingly to prevent any harm to employees or any individual acquainted to a certain activity or establishment. The key roles and principles of occupational hygiene are Anticipation, Identification, Evaluation and Control (Schoeman and van den Heever, 2014; Harmse, 2008; SAMTRAC, 2012). To practise in accordance to the above principle; a hazard identification and risk assessment needs to be conducted. Anticipation is the foreseeing of the activity
Identification of the risk can simply be done by doing brainstorming with the team members. As Dr. McCarville said, there is no right or wrong answers. Every input is important and can really affect the process. Other beneficial tool is Fishbone Diagram.