Rhetorical Analysis Of What Corporate America Can T Build A Sentence

1403 Words3 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis of “What Corporate America Can’t Build: A Sentence”
“What Corporate America Can’t Build: A Sentence”, a newspaper article written by Sam Dillon, addresses corporate America and those in the education system coming into corporate America. The message Dillon conveys to his audience is that there is a problem with the clarity and effectiveness in communication as the work force progresses towards written communication, highlighted by how common emails have become. Dillon’s article strongly influences people in the education system that will soon be entering corporate America, along with those who are already in the workforce. The New York Times author manages to achieved this through his use of statistics that show how harmful …show more content…

In the article there are many highly respectable people, from corporate America and educational writing places, that are referenced to make Dillon appear more knowledgeable to his audience and make his argument more persuasive. To make sure all of the audience are included quotes that apply to both groups are used to provide credibility to Dillons name beyonds what he has. For examples “"It 's not that companies want to hire Tolstoy," said Susan Traiman, a director at the Business Roundtable, an association of leading chief executives whose corporations were surveyed in the study.” (Dillon 416). That quote references Susan Traiman someone who deals with the companies, of which students hope to get a job from in corporate America. That quote also lends credibility from the status Susan has in the corporate world make the article seem trustworthy to those who already are in corporate America. Taking quotes from someone high up in corporate America helps show the audience that they should trust the statistics and examples that were previously explained. Interviewing only people in corporate America would leave the argument incomplete so there are many other people from the education side quoted as well. “Kaitlin Duck Sherwood, author of a popular how-to manual on effective email” Is one of the many people from the education, which are referenced in the article to make Dillon sound knowledgeable about solutions to the problem that the people interviewed in corporate America talked about (Dillon 417). Sherwood helps pass on the thought that the agenda Dillon is trying to push is well thought out. While Sherwood might not directly say Dillons plan is well thought out. The audience will put together the thoughts that corporate and education world are both trying to fix this problem. The Rhetoric is thought out and appeals to people

Open Document