Rhetorical Analysis Of Lincoln's House Divided By Abraham Lincoln

992 Words2 Pages

House Divided
Lincoln was a very smart lawyer and politician. During his “House Divided” speech he asked the question, “Can we, as a nation, continue together permanently, forever, half slave, and half free?" When he first asked this question, America was slowly gaining the knowledge and realizing that as a nation, it could not possibly exist as half-slave and half-free. It was either one way or the other. “Slavery was unconstitutional and immoral, but not simply on a practical level.” (Greenfield, 2009) Slave states and free states had significantly different and incompatible interests. In 1858, when Lincoln made his “House Divided” speech, he made people think about this question with views if what the end result in America must be.
"A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect …show more content…

It would be either all free as the result of abolishing slavery, or it would be all slave because slavery had spread to every state in the union. Even today we are facing the same situation. To get a better understanding of Lincoln;s words, it can be stated as “American cannot continue as a nation, half-socialist and half-free. Either one will fall or the other. Either all the states and every state and city, town and village will become socialist. Or all will become free." A Slaveholding economy or a Socialist economy cannot co-exist for long with a free system. They must naturally consume and expand to survive. And Socialism, the modern day slavery, is quickly expanding across America. And we cannot long survive as a mix of free states and slave states. We can either have a nation of free men, or a slaveholding nanny state. We cannot have both. “The time when we could choose is quickly passing, and the chains and collars are nearing our throats.”(Greenfield,

Open Document