Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Example of prison rehabilitation programs
Example of prison rehabilitation programs
Religious freedom religion aspect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Example of prison rehabilitation programs
Due to the fact that I currently work in the jail, I have an understanding why it is important to grant inmates the rights to religious freedoms. Not only it is a person’s right to practice any religion of their choice, but I have find during my time as a Detention Deputy that inmates use religion to cope with the charges that they are facing and to get through their sentencing.
Inmates should be granted the use of exercise my material within reason. For instance, they should be allowed to have bibles, facial hair, and any specific meals that their respective religion requires them to intake. I also believe that outside of going to religious services, inmates should be allowed to conduct personal prayers in their living area as long as
they are not doing it in a manner that disturbs other inmates. “They report a change in their sense of personal power, and they say it enables them to cope with the pressures of being in prison” (Dammer, 61). This evidence proves that religion helps inmates get through the issues that they deal with during incarceration. “If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you” (John 15:7). Regardless of the charges that inmates are facing, they steal deserve to consult with God, ask for forgiveness, and pray that He answers their prayers. “Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation, the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak” (Matthew 26:41). Allowing inmates the right to pray and do all of the rituals that come along with their religion could possibly prevent them from getting into more trouble while incarcerated. This could prevent fights in the jail, suicide attempts amongst other things. I personally believe that when religious freedoms are monitored in a jail setting, inmates are not able to abuse their religious freedom. For example, when the Chapel sits down with an inmate and confirms their religion before granting them special trays, inmates no that they can’t simply claim a religion just to get special privileges. In conclusion, God wants all of His children to seek His guidance, inmates are still God’s children and should be able to lean in His guidance.
Petioner Nazari as will be call here in-after, asserts that while in Prison, inmates retain their right to exercise their rel'igious beliefs. Petitioner contends that Bureau of Prisons denies the basic rights of conscience to Rastafarian. Puisuant to Equal Protection Under the Law, requires that all persons similarly situated be treated alike. Within the Bureau of Prisons, religious diets are recognized for Jews, Muslims and so forth. But the Rastafarian Dietary Tenets are challenged at every door.
Throughout his novel, Texas Tough: The Rise of America’s Prison Empire, author and professor Robert Perkinson outlines the three current dominant purposes of prison. The first, punishment, is the act of disciplining offenders in an effort to prevent them from recommitting a particular crime. Harsh punishment encourages prisoners to behave because many will not want to face the consequences of further incarceration. While the purpose of punishment is often denounced, many do agree that prison should continue to be used as a means of protecting law-abiding citizens from violent offenders. The isolation of inmates, prison’s second purpose, exists to protect the public. Rehabilitation is currently the third purpose of prison. Rehabilitation is considered successful when a prisoner does n...
Harvey Leroy Sossamon III was denied the ability to use the prison chapels, in the state prison in which he was being held (Oyez.org). Sossamon had been in the Robertson Unit of the Correctional Institutions Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice since 2002 (Fasoro). His claims for use were that of religious purposes, the state prison warden in fact denied all inmates that were cell restricted access to such activities. Sossamon was entitled to the use the chapel, in fact it was in his rights. However the prison inmates were provided with different ways and places to practice their religion. Regardless Sossamon explained that the alternatives were absent of Christian symbol. In fact Sossamon witnessed Muslim inmates receive better treatment (Findlaw.com). This came in the forms of treatment, meals and other necessities. Sossamon also added that the alternatives were noisy from the exterior and unfit for religious worship due in part to bad conditions (Fasoro). Sossamon also confirmed if the inmates did not cease prayer when ordered by the guards they were subjected to retaliation or other physical mistreatment (Findlaw.com).Sossamon to advantage of his Secular activity time and began to study the law. Finally when the inmates were on lockdown, could not participate in religious activities but could still participate in schedule secular activities (Fasoro).
... their religious influence and instead became areas of secular interest. When the jails were small and easier to control, so were the religious motives behind the institutions. However, as time, number of criminals, and recognition by the outside community grew, the jails needed to adapt. They had to abandon their religious motivation and instead focus their attention on more worldly issues, such as financing jails that were underfunded to begin with, and now had even more prisoners, each occupying more and more of the valuable resources. While ideological thinking went into the original designs, such as solitary confinement, this soon had to be abandoned out of lack of space. Religion was trumped by secular interest, which dominated, and continues to dominate the prison reform movements that occurred both in the mid 19th century, and those that continue to this day.
Inmates should be allowed to sue if they are deprived of certain programs, services, or amenities. I believe that inmates are in prison to be rehabilitated and punished. Therefore, inmates should have access to drug or alcohol treatment programs. This is not only extremely beneficial to inmates wanting to get clean, but it is a great opportunity to help inmates make crucial behavioral changes. If inmates are denied of this right, they should be able to sue, because it is one of the essential steps in their rehabilitation. Many individuals that are in prison have a drug or alcohol problem; therefore, they deserve to have the resources to get better otherwise they are only going to continue to do what they have been doing. Prisoners need to be rehabilitated, because punishing them is not going to fix all of their behavioral
... middle of paper ... ... Anything that would ultimately contribute to an inmate's success is needed. Whether it be mandatory employment and training or curfew and other factors that benefit them.
...t. An inmate should not be put in solitary confinement without a court order. They can be kept in their cell, but should be able to exercise at least two hours each day and shower for at least thirty minutes a day. Inmates also should have thirty minutes of counseling and therapy every day. The focus of solitary confinement should be protection and rehabilitation. Inmates in solitary confinement should be given books and educational supplies to help them develop the skills needed to remain out of prison when they have finished their sentence. Also they should be given access to programs that are specifically designed for them to get out of solitary confinement. Every inmate in solitary confinement should have psychiatric testing done at least every month. If an inmate does not pass this test, then they should be removed from solitary confinement and put in therapy.
To a certain extent religious freedom should be given however if it a religion or practice that calls harm or danger to someone or someones’ then no because no prisoner who is set to be sentenced for a long period of time isn’t going to add more time to their sentencing because whoever they believe in higher power calls for actions of violence. Founded by Thomas Jefferson and other founder’s religious freedom is inalienable right that can’t be taken away by the government. Four foundations that support legal rights of prisoner rights. 1. Constitutions: list the basic rights of individuals and individuals do not lose these rights when they are incarcerated. However, government interests make it impossible for individuals to keep all their rights due to safety, security, rehabilitation, etc. 2. Statutes: laws passed by elected officials and may provide inmates with specific rights beyond those addressed in the
Life in prison can be a difficult experience to properly comprehend as an individual who has never been behind bars or somebody who has not been subjected under criminal law and incarcerated. Researcher Muzammil Quraishi, a British Muslim has undergone a year of research from July 2001 to July 2002 investigating Muslim prisoners in the United Kingdom. Muzammil goes through numerous challenged in his year worth of research investigating a sum of three anonymous prisons. Doing such Muzammil had gone through numerous obstacles, generic research validity, to the side effects of the field research. This paper will separate three columns of obstacles Muzammil had to go through, Technical issues, which would outline the challenges, he as a researched had to adapt to due to the setting he was investigating. The second is Political issues, which mostly stem from outside interferences; most notable would be the incident on September 11, 2001. Finally, the third is administration issues, which has the spotlight on regulations Muzammil had to abide by to get on with his research in a legitimate manner.
Solitary confinement is based on a Quaker belief that inmates isolated in cells with only a Bible would use the time to pray for forgiveness and find their place and meaning in life (Sullivan; 2006). While solitary confinement in the twenty-first century isn not based on the founding Quaker belief, the basic principals still apply. Hoskins, a researcher, says “In one sense, solitary might seem especially conductive to the sort of moral reflect that might lead to reform. The extreme isolation of such units, after all, offers prisoners plenty of time (in fact, little else) during which they might choose to contemplate the wrongness of their acts” (Hoskins; 2013). Researcher, Suedfeld, argues that in conjunction with a “rehabilitative system”, convict isolation can lead to the development of “non-criminal lifestyles”. It has also been argued that by separating women from other women, who may help us confirm or deny our identities, time in isolation can help women, and men, to discover who they really are and what they can give back to our society (Long;
The ethical theory of utilitarianism and the perspective on relativism, of prison labor along with the relativism on criminal behavior of individuals incarcerated are two issues that need to be addressed. Does the utilitarianism of prisoner’s right laws actually protect them? Or are the unethical actions of the international and states right laws exploiting the prison labor? Unethical procedures that impact incarcerated individuals and correctional staff, the relativism of respect as people and not just prisoner’s; the safety of all inmates and correctional staff, are all issues worth continuous reflection.
Religious discrimination in prison is a major problem. In 2011, Holt v. Hobbs was brought before the Supreme Court. Gregory Holt was a Muslim inmate who was denied to grow his beard for religious purposes by the Arkansas Department of Correction (Vallely). Some prisons around the U.S are ignoring prisoner’s religious rights and making them suffer by forcing them to stop their religious activities. Inmates are being tormented because of their beliefs and prisons are doing little or nothing to protect them. It should not matter what religion one follows when spending time in prison, and it should not change the way people treat them. Many prisoners have been tormented by officials and other prisoners for the religion they follow. It has a long term effect on some because the verbal and physical abuse they get will never be forgotten. The government must monitor the officials in charge to assure they are protecting those being bullied for their
...on are usually focused on keeping the prisoners mentally happy. Religious programs provide inmates with coping mechanisms and spiritual guidance which enable them to deal with prison life. These programs also provide forums for prisoners where they can be able to forgive motivate and reconcile with their fellow inmates within the prison (O’Conner & Pallone, 2003). The efficacy of these programs has also not been determined by criminologists given that most prisoners who practice religion in prison fail to do so once they are released. Religious programs are therefore seen as temporary measures that enable prisoners to find spiritual solace in either Christian religious programs or Qaran readings. The overall effectiveness of these programs will however be determined by the number of prisoners who have not recorded any repeat offenses on being released from prison.
In this essay, I will explain how religion is sometimes used to mobilize against LGBT people, how some people’s religious and personal doctrines conflict regarding LGBT issues, and how religious belief and community can be a positive force for the LGBT community.
Prison inmates should be able work and spend time doing community service to contribute to society to repay for their wrong doing and develop a better character. This practice is available in some prisons and has so far, been proven effective. Labor for inmates should not be mandatory, but should be something the inmates are allowed to consider. By being able to function in the workplace, inmates will overtime develop a better sense of common knowledge in regards to being responsible and doing the right thing, be able to function in the workplace and in society, and get paid after their sentence for all of the work they’ve done.