Pros And Cons Of The Civil Rights Movement

551 Words2 Pages

Civil Disobedince is a historical issue that is the refusal to follow goverment commands, and pay taxes in order to change something. The Civil Rights Movement and recent events is an exellent example because it deals with protesting, boycotting and nonpayment of taxes. Many Scholars have argued that Civil Disobedince has pros and cons. This essay will examine the postive outcomes that many scholars, and I have regonized, and the lack of posivity in another. Scholars believe the time peiod of the Civil Rights Movement encouaged African Americans to stand up for their rights and equility. For example, Historian Diedre B Flowers, has suggested that the leaders during the 1950’s and 1960’s have made a huge impact in society. Flowers states that the role of black woman in Bennett College have influenced the protest strategy of sit-ins. Which, was launching all throughout the United States. This helped the community have encourment and moral stamina to rise up for their equal rights. Another historian known as Chris Taylor wrote “ It Taught Boycotts, Now it Faces One.” and uses Civil …show more content…

They believed some unrecognized leaders have significance to Civil Disobedince. In the article written by Herb Boyd, the historian talks about Rosa Park’s teacher, Septima Clark. Clark taught her students to protest with non-violent methods and strategies. Her legency of her classes pursaded Rosa Park to have courage for the community. Therefore, making Rosa Parks the mother of the Civil Right Movement, and teaching to be respectful even when others push you down. As noted earlier, Lousie Hamon also has similiarites. In his article, Scholar Hamon used a Stand-up comedian known as Lenny Bruce, as a civilly disobedient person. Although Lenny Bruce is an outlaw, he was willing to stand-up for what he thought was right. In effect, that Lousie belived he was a leader and heartbroken that college students didnt know

Open Document