Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

1783 Words4 Pages

The dictionary defines animal testing as the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, esp. for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs. Today there are millions of mice, rabbits, cats, dogs, and other animals being locked inside barren enclosures in research facilities across the country. Like us, they can feel pain and fear, but also excitement and satisfaction. Close contact with animals shows that they look forward to some extents. They can get a lot of enjoyment from their lives, be it from basking in the sun, exercising, eating their favorite food, or interacting with one another. Certainly some animals don’t have the same abilities humans do. Regardless of their intelligence, their life still has value. We as humans have put our wants and needs before theirs and have used them as test subjects for our personal gain. They suffer through pain, extreme frustration, loneliness, and an aching to be free. Examples of animal tests include forcing them to inhale toxic fumes, force-feeding dogs pesticides, and rubbing chemicals into shaved or abraded skin. They endure these tests with …show more content…

Research animals are cared for by veterinarians, husbandry specialists, and animal health technicians to protect their wellbeing. (real testing conditons) But it is a proven fact that most experiments are flawed, wasting the lives of the animal subjects. A 2009 peer-reviewed study found serious flaws in the majority of publicly funded United States animal studies using rodents and primates. Several of the studies failed to randomize the selection of animals. Also, "Only 59% of the studies stated the hypothesis or objective of the study and the number and characteristics of the animals used" (Sibal). Since the majority of animals used in biomedical research are killed during or after the experiments, the lives of animals are routinely sacrificed for poor

Open Document