Pharmaceutical Rep Case Study

1966 Words4 Pages

Pharmaceutical Representatives and Physicians: Defining a New Policy of Regulation The ethics surrounding the Pharmaceutical Industry in the United States and around the world have long been debated by not only healthcare professional, but the general public as well. Due to their high revenues rates and constant legal battles with the government and consumers, new regulations are constantly being developed. For example, in 2009, new voluntary regulations were put out by The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America in order to establish guidelines regarding the relationship between physicians and drug representatives in an attempt to improve patient care as a whole. As stated in the new code, “Interactions should be focused …show more content…

In order to do this, drug reps simply don’t explain the benefits of the drug, but instead often resort to other means of influencing physicians’ decision. For example, things like food deliveries, free samples, expensive dinners for the whole staff, and tickets to a wealth of sporting events are not uncommon. It is quite plain to see that such gifts and benefits that doctors receive could comprise their ability to make a purely objective decision when deciding which drug to use. For example, “Patients with hypertension that are treated with ‘free’ drug samples are less likely to have their hypertension controlled than are patients whose hypertension is treated by the physicians’ free choice of drugs.” Why is that? The causality here is not clear. Are the drugs less effective? Drug companies believe these gifts and other perks like samples work so well that they devoted $13 billion in the year of 2006 to this practice. Even when pharmaceutical representatives finally do gain access to physicians and are given time to educate them on the benefits of a certain drugs; the information disseminated was often very questionable. “One study found that materials distributed during visits usually made assertions without providing evidence to support them, and sometimes promoted non-approved

Open Document