Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal testing ethical issue
Benefits of animal testing
Benefits of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Animal testing ethical issue
For the morally driven question should animals be used in medical research, the answer is yes. It has been proven over the course history that animals prove insight to many of the medical questions we ask today. As science began to development so did the testing of animals and humans for medical research. Animals prove many insights to how to cure many illness. Animals should be used for medical research, because many of the animals are links to answers that could save the whole human race. For the entire existence of the human race animal testing has always been a part of it. Animal testing began all the back in 1926, with scientist Arthur Guedel. He “successfully demonstrated the safety of a cuffed tracheal tube in 1926 on his dog that …show more content…
As the times have changed so has people’s opinions on animal testing. In this quote it highlights an important new development in the ethical matter of animal testing. (2007) Society views towards animal research is an ethical dilemma, the polls show that a high amount of percentages. There was 84% in 1999, 90% in 2002 and 89% in 2005 of people ready to accept the use of animals in medical research if the research is for serious medical purposes.”(pg.27) these people feel strongly against suffering and want it minimized or having alternatives.”(pg. 27) Another view in animals testing is that it has allowed for new developments in medical disease. For many of the sickness that effect everyday humans much of the animals testing have help make a huge steps towards find a cure and more answers that are need. For instance the Embo Reports states an example for a screening of anit cancer drug. (2005) “For example, screening potential anti-cancer drugs uses the so-called hollow-fibre system, in which tumour cells are grown in a tube-like polymer matrix that is implanted into mice. Drugs are then administered, the tubes removed and the number of cells determined. This system has increased the amount of data that can be obtained per animal in some studies and has therefore reduced the number of mice used” (pg. 23). The theory of animals being used to give a glimpse in how to …show more content…
Some believe that sciences has two types; good and bad. Good science is define by Embo Report as (2007) “Good science is define by having a good experimental design that helps reduce the number of animals used in the research. This allow scientists to gather data using the minimum number of animals required” (pg. 50). There are also consequences to good science seen in this quote, (2007)” Good science also means that there is a sufficient number that must be used to enable “precise statistical analysis and to generate significant results to prevent the repetition of experiments and the consequent need to use more animals” (pg. 50). Many of those who are in favor of animal rights believe that animal testing is a cruel act and murder. For some of these testing the animals are left with little time to heal. In addition some animal do not even get a chance to live after the testing. The testing process can be very harsh and brutal. The bioresearches perfectly gives a description on how some of these testing go (2015) “In order to create these models, animals are subjected to invasive procedures, which can include surgeries, traumatic injuries, burns, force-feeding, blood draws, biopsies, food, water, and social
In my opinion, I think that if there is an alternative way in getting the same test results, then animal testing should be avoided. If the use of animals is required in order to obtain more knowledge of medicine then I believe that the welfare of the animals should be a priority of the researchers and if the well-being of the subjects is compromised then measures should be taken to correct these mistakes. I am not an advocate of abusing animals in order to advance research, but I do believe that the use of animals in research studies is extremely beneficial. Without the use of animal testing researchers would not have as many answers and solutions to problems that we have, such as sickness.
Every year, millions of animals are injured or killed in scientific experiments across the world. Those in favor of animal experimentation say they’re taking animals’ lives to save humans. But is it really necessary to subject animals to torturous conditions or painful experiments in the name of science? Is it ethical to destroy an animal’s life while simply testing lipstick or shampoo? Animal experimentation, like many of the issues we face today, is difficult to argue against, and just as hard to support, but it is necessary to continue this experimentation in order to advance human knowledge and to help save human lives.
Every year millions of animals are abused, injured, and hurt. It seems as if humans are not very concerned about animal rights according to these statistics.. Animal rights is the idea that animals should not have to suffer and be able to be in possession of their life. Some people are willing to sacrifice things such as certain brands of makeup or certain kinds of food to improve animal welfare. For many years animals have been experimented on and placed in factory farms. Factory farming is a method of producing food products where the factories value how much they produce and how much they profit over the welfare of the animals. These farms keep animals confined in small spaces and make the animals eat things they were not originally
“The question is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk. But can they suffer?” (Bentham). Each year over a hundred million animals endure a number of experiments in an attempt to make human lives easier. These experiments range from cosmetic testing to medical research, sadly neither of these tests are needed. Many people will accept animal research because they believe that these animals aren’t suffering (“Harm and Suffering”) or they believe that animal testing in beneficial to humans. In reality, these animals suffer for mankind, when the need does not exist. Animal testing creates unnecessary pain and suffering for animals, when in reality most experiments will not benefit human health.
Animals are used as a part of experimentations in order to accomplish new openings. A few individuals think that it is satisfactory, while others contend that it is not moral to sacrifice animals for science. Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Despite the significance of experiments, the quantity of animals and purpose of research are not under any control. Animals testing should be banned under a few circumstances; we can enhance the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society for Applied Ethology.
Animal testing has been in practice since the early 300’s BCE, often used by ancient philosophers to advance the very little knowledge at the time in the field of biomedicine. Some of these philosophers who began animal testing are well known, such as Aristotle and Erasistratus. Another scientist named Ibn Zuhr came up with the idea of using animals to test surgical procedures on animals before beginning them on human patients (Hajar). Rachel Hajar, M.D., states that animal testing began to undergo criticism from animal welfare and protection groups because of the inhumane procedures inflicted on the animals. These groups had laws passed in many countries that gave the animals more protection when being researched upon. Scientists who support animal testing insist that it is necessary to expand our knowledge in the science and medicine world. Claude Bernard, a physiologist, says “Experiments on animals are entirely conclusive for the toxicology and hygiene of man. The effects of these substances are the same on man as on animals, save for differences in degree” (“Animal Testing and Medicine”). Because of the large amount of debate ...
Today, millions of animals are being tested on for the use of human products, causing them to fall ill and die, leaving them no choice but to be experimented on. Animal abuse can be more than what meets the eye. Specifically, animal testing is a form of animal abuse and usually ends in death of a harmless animal. Some might say that there is no other way to test products, but due to the harm that is done and our advancements in science, animal testing should not be tolerated.
Throughout the history of biomedical research, testing on animals has been happening (Animal testing and medicine). This goes back all the way to early Greek physicians such as Aristotle and Erasistratus which was around 350 BC. These two were performing experiments on live animals all the way back then (animal testing and medicine).
Vivisection is the practice of performing procedures on live animals for the purpose of experimentation or scientific research. A popular controversy in today’s society is whether or not animals should be tested for purposes of human-based research. This research can determine the results of new products, test human health and evaluate the safety of consumer and industry products (Humane). These experiments are irrelevant to humans. Animals should not have to suffer for the benefits of mankind. Vivisection is cruel and inhumane, poorly predictive of human outcomes and is not the only method available to discover possible repercussions. Vivisection is barbaric and is inessential for the progression of human life.
“UF also has several dog colonies selectively bred to be predisposed to getting certain diseases for gene therapy research. Sometimes, dogs succumb to the disease and have to be euthanized” (Schweers). Animal Experimentation is done only for Human benefit. Animal experimentation dates all the way back to the ancient Greek and Romans. Today animal experimentation is used in biomedical research. Biomedical Research can fall under many topics. Some of which are genetically modified organisms, gene doping, manipulation of DNA,cloning and raising animals with intentional genetic diseases, and ethical considerations. Scientists should not be allowed to
“Over 1 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in U.S. labs” according to DoSomething.org. And although these animals may be considered protected under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) they are still able to be tortured and mistreated in labs. On top of all this, there is absolutely no guarantee that results and data collected from these procedures are accurate. Our anatomic builds are similar in ways but not at all interchangeable. Even though it has saved lives, animal experimentation should be banned because it is not a guarantee that these procedures are done pain free and humans and animals react differently to the medicines and chemicals used.
Animal testing should be done to create new medical treatments and cures. Since animal testing was discovered, it helped reduce cost and increased better treatment and also cured many diseases that could have been uncurbable without animal testing. The director of the University of Texas M.D Chris Abee, stated that we would not have a vaccine for Hepatitis B without chimpanzees. Animal testing has assisted countless amounts of people that suffered diseases. Some examples include: Hepatitis B, polio, breast cancer, and childhood leukemia. Animals like chimpanzees and mice have been confirmed to have a 97% or higher DNA similarity to the human being. Animal testing is safer than on humans since it helps ensure the safety of drugs, treatments, and cures by letting scientists investigate the safeness of the drugs before it can be used on humans. Animal testing should continue since it has helped plenty of people with diseases get vaccinated and hopefully cure many more.
Our case is that if we don’t test on animals then progress in scientific fields would be halted. As first speaker for the negative I will speak about the benefits of animal testing in general and then I’ll talk in detail about animal testing in medicine. My second speaker will talk about the opinions on testing and the food chain and my third speaker will summarise our points and rebut.
Every year, millions of animals experience painful, suffering and death due to results of scientific research as the effects of drugs, medical procedures, food additives, cosmetics and other chemical products. Basically, animal experimentation has played a dominant role in leading with new findings and human advantages. Animal research has had a main function in many scientific and medical advances in the past decade and is helping in the understanding of several diseases. While most people believe than animal testing is necessary, others are worried about the excessive suffering of this innocent’s creatures. The balance between the rights of animals and their use in medical research is a delicate issue with huge societal assumptions. Nowadays people are trying to understand and take in consideration these social implications based in animals rights. Even though, many people tend to disregard animals that have suffered permanent damage during experimentation time. Many people try to misunderstand the nature of life that animals just have, and are unable to consider the actual laboratory procedures and techniques that these creatures tend to be submitted. Animal experimentation must be excluded because it is an inhumane way of treat animals, it is unethical, and exist safer ways to test products without painful test.
For years animal testing has been a very controversial issue around the globe. Animal testing has been very beneficial to people, but has cause an up stir to animal rights activists and organizations like PETA. “The earliest references to animal ex...