Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nike business analysis
Nike business analysis
Chapter 4 analysis of financial statement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nike business analysis
Executive Summary
Introduction
Kimi Ford, a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group, a mutual-fund management firm, was considering buying share for the fund she managed, the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund, with an emphasis on value investing.
Ford held an analysts’ meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results and most importantly, to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Nike had maintained revenue of about 9 billion since 1997. However, its net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million. Moreover, Nike’s market share in U.S. athletic shoes had fallen from 48% since 1997 to 42% in 2000.
In order to boost revenue, management decided to develop more athletic-shoe products in the midpriced segment which are sold for $70-$90 a pair. As for the cost side to be considered, Nike planned to exert more effort on expense control. The company executives forecasted that their long-term revenue-growth targets of 8% to 10% and earnings-growth targets of above 15%.
In order to decide on an investment decision regarding the mutual fund she managed, Ford decided to develop her own discounted cash flow forecast.
Since Ford was not sure whether to buy stocks, she asked Cohen to estimate Nike’s weighted average cost of capital.
Obviously, this case aims to evaluate Joanna’s analysis. Throughout the analysis, we will estimate the cost of debt, cost of equity, and cost of capital through different financial analysis models.
WACC Approach
WACC is the weighted average return on capital that includes both cost of debt and equity, whereby we discount total cash flows by the appropriate discount rates
By using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), Cohen calculated a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 8.4%.
...
... middle of paper ...
...is model wouldn’t fit into this case simply because it does not take the growth factor into consideration and therefore, it is considered inconsistent here and should be not used in computing the cost of capital.
The final model used to compute the cost of capital was the earning capitalization model. The problem with this model is that it does not take into consideration the growth of the company. Therefore we chose to reject this calculation. The earnings capitalization model calculations were found this way:
ECM
ECM = E1/Po
216/42.09
5.31%
Recommendation
The sensitivity analysis revealed that Nike was undervalued at a discount rates below 11.17%, when we calculated the WACC our solution was 9.87%. Any estimate below the prescribed discount rate means the stock is undervalued, therefore, it is undervalued and this implies that Nike is a buy stock.
The WACC is basically computed by the sum of multiplying the costs per component to its respective proportional weight (how much that company uses a certain cost of capital) [See Appendix 1]. As financial management is focused on the maximization of the stock price, an optimal structure of costs based on these three factors is needed.
In order to do this the WACC approach will be used based on the assumption that leverage will stay constant after 2012. Industry average of debt/value is 28.1 percent and debt/equity 71.9 percent. These figures will be used as an estimate for long-term leverage because it is expected that AirThread will maintain a leverage ratio that is constant with the industry. From this the relevered equity beta is found to be 0.9847 which will give an equity rate of return of 9.42 percent. The rate of return on debt will be 5.5 percent. This is the percentage of debt because it is the interest rate of the 10 year U.S. Treasury bond. The WACC is now found to be 7.80 percent. Next, the long-term growth rate of 2.9 percent will be assumed to stay constant. In order to determine the FCF 2013 FCF 2012 of $315.60 will be multiplied by the growth rate. This will give a FCF 2013 of $323.48. The FCF 2013 will then be divided by the WACC minus growth rate. By doing this the PV of terminal value is found to be approximately $4.6 billion. To see the calculations for this step refer to Exhibit 3 in the
Star Appliance is looking to expand their product line and is considering three different projects: dishwashers, garbage disposals, and trash compactors. We want to determine which project would be worth doing by determining if they will add value to Star. Thus, the project(s) that will add the most value to Star Appliance will be worth pursuing. The current hurdle rate of 10% should be re-evaluated by finding the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Then by forecasting the cash flows of each project and discounting them by the WACC to find the net present value, or by solving for the internal rate of return, we should be able to see which projects Star should undertake.
The estimates of cost of capital for equity 6.14% are making by using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) to generate forecast of DDM and RIM. This method is defined by the sum of risk free rate plus beta that multiplied with a risk premium. Particularly, the beta, which is a quantitative measure of the volatility of company stock relative to the unstable of the overall market, found in JB HI-FI case at 0.56 (JB HI-FI financial statement 2016). It
...d the cost of equity I made a sensitivity analysis chart for Cisco through which I came up with the target price of $32.50. This chart shows the different price ranges of the stock which could be possible if the Terminal Value Perpetuity Growth Rate went higher or lower compared to the Cost of Equity.
First of all an analysis of the packaging machine investment’s hurdle rate is required. I will use comparable firm parameters approach to figure out the hurdle rate (WACC) of the firm using the information provided in Exhibit 5. The cost of debt should be calculated using the bond information given in footnote 2 of case under Exhibit 2. The cost of equity should be calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model.
There are many valuation methods that could be used to evaluate this company. Finding a method that valuates the stand-alone value is difficult. The stand-alone value should be dependent upon the firm’s own assets and projected future income. We decided to evaluate this company based upon two methods: The Discounted Cash Flow Method and the Comparable Companies Method.
The corporation should invest more money in research and innovation since this is what has helped them to make a product that rivals their competitors. At the same time, it is imperative for them to improve their machinery for cheap labor costs which will help the company increase its production allowing it to meet the demand in the market. By improving production leading to lower costs of making shoes, apparel, and equipment, Nike will achieve higher demand assuming a quality product is maintained in that process. They will stand a better chance of competing in the industry (Hill, 2009). The organization is already in a better position for meeting the demand, customer taste, and needs. The company should improve quality by focusing on developing lightweight products that are more durable compared to those offered by the competitors. Also, Nike can keep up their success by continuing to reinvent and improve their items and continue to meet the current demand by using new technology. It can also use the Internet to communicate with consumers (Hill, 2009). By developing new technology, Nike will allow the customers to suggest and design their shoes online. To achieve this goal, it is fundamental to enhance areas such as their website to make it more user-friendly. Finally, the company should pay attention to small startup organizations that enter the
Only a week earlier, on June 28, 2001, Nike had held an analysts' meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results.1 The meeting, however, had another purpose: Nike management wanted to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Since 1997, its revenues had plateaued at around $9 billion, while net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million (see Exhibit 1). Nike's market share in U.S. athletic shoes had fallen from 48%, in 1997, to 42% in 2000.2 In addition, recent supply-chain issues and the adverse effect of a strong dollar had negatively affected revenue.
The numerical analysis will not use information that relates to time past the last full accounting period, however the conclusion will attempt to reconcile any share price movement with the analysis. The report will assess three models for their suitability in analysing the capital structure of the RM, (Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the dividend valuation model). The Royal Mail is a FTSE 100 company founded nearly 500 years ago by Henry VIII under the name “The King’s Post” (http://www.royalmailgroup.com/ 2015). The UK Government on 15 October 2013 began the process of transferring ownership of the RM from public hands to private investors. In the first sale, the government sold shares to the value of £1.98 to a mixture of staff and institutional investors.
The following content provided will include information regarding Nikes Inc. cash management strategies, which will include more in depth information from the previous group paper. In addition, working capital recommendations will be provided to senior management base on next year’s in the pro-forma financial statements.
a. 1. What sources of capital should be included when you estimate Harry Davis’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC)?
Nike’s Asian operations had previously continued to soar generating US$300 million in 1994 in revenues to a whopping US$1.2 billion in 1997. However based on the Asian economic crisis, this had adversely affected revenues, while regional layoffs were inevitable. Nike also performed well in the European market generating about US$2 billion in sales and a good growth momentum was expected, however, some parts of Europe were only slowly recovering from an economic downturn. In the Americas (Canada and the U.S.A.), Nike experienced a growth rate for several quarters. The U.S. alone generated approximately US$5 billion in sales. The Latin American market at this point was exposed to economic volatility; however Nike still saw them as a market with “great potential for the future”.
Nevertheless, Nike is an extremely diverse company with outstanding organizational structure, impressive marketing strategy, and innovative products. The organizational structure of the Nike Corporation helped them become a leading innovator for the world with creative apparels and shoes. Their intelligent marketing strategies assist them in advertising their products to motive their customers and sell them. Their innovative product motivates customers with great performance footwear and quality designs to take on any obstacles. The Nike Corporation discovers various ways to improve their organizational structure to inspire the world.